Suppr超能文献

用于展示患者安全数据的仪表盘:系统评价。

Dashboards for visual display of patient safety data: a systematic review.

机构信息

Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

Purdue School of Engineering and Technology, Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021 Oct;28(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100437.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Methods to visualise patient safety data can support effective monitoring of safety events and discovery of trends. While quality dashboards are common, use and impact of dashboards to visualise patient safety event data remains poorly understood.

OBJECTIVES

To understand development, use and direct or indirect impacts of patient safety dashboards.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL for publications between 1 January 1950 and 30 August 2018 involving use of dashboards to display data related to safety targets defined by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Patient Safety Net. Two reviewers independently reviewed search results for inclusion in analysis and resolved disagreements by consensus. We collected data on development, use and impact via standardised data collection forms and analysed data using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Literature search identified 4624 results which were narrowed to 33 publications after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria and consensus across reviewers. Publications included only time series and case study designs and were inpatient focused and emergency department focused. Information on direct impact of dashboards was limited, and only four studies included informatics or human factors principles in development or postimplementation evaluation.

DISCUSSION

Use of patient-safety dashboards has grown over the past 15 years, but impact remains poorly understood. Dashboard design processes rarely use informatics or human factors principles to ensure that the available content and navigation assists task completion, communication or decision making.

CONCLUSION

Design and usability evaluation of patient safety dashboards should incorporate informatics and human factors principles. Future assessments should also rigorously explore their potential to support patient safety monitoring including direct or indirect impact on patient safety.

摘要

背景

可视化患者安全数据的方法可以支持对安全事件的有效监测和趋势的发现。虽然质量仪表板很常见,但仪表板用于可视化患者安全事件数据的方式及其影响仍知之甚少。

目的

了解患者安全仪表板的开发、使用以及直接或间接的影响。

方法

我们按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行了系统评价。我们在 PubMed、EMBASE 和 CINAHL 中搜索了 1950 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 8 月 30 日期间发表的涉及使用仪表板来显示与医疗保健研究和质量局患者安全网定义的安全目标相关的数据的出版物。两名审查员独立审查了纳入分析的搜索结果,并通过共识解决了分歧。我们通过标准化数据收集表收集了有关开发、使用和影响的数据,并使用描述性统计进行了数据分析。

结果

文献搜索共确定了 4624 项结果,经过纳入和排除标准以及审查员之间的共识筛选后,最终纳入了 33 项出版物。出版物仅包括时间序列和案例研究设计,且侧重于住院患者和急诊科。关于仪表板直接影响的信息有限,只有四项研究在开发或实施后评估中纳入了信息学或人为因素原则。

讨论

过去 15 年来,患者安全仪表板的使用有所增加,但影响仍知之甚少。仪表板设计流程很少使用信息学或人为因素原则来确保可用内容和导航有助于任务完成、沟通或决策制定。

结论

患者安全仪表板的设计和可用性评估应纳入信息学和人为因素原则。未来的评估还应严格探索其支持患者安全监测的潜力,包括对患者安全的直接或间接影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb32/8496385/aa914a65ef29/bmjhci-2021-100437f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验