Marcus Robert F
University of Maryland, Human Development, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Violence Vict. 2012;27(3):299-314. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.27.3.299.
This study examined nonviolent (NV), unilaterally violent (UV), and mutually violent (MV) patterns of perpetrated intimate partner violence in relation to dyadic relationship quality and partner injury. The respondents were 1,294 young adult, Add Health partners (AHP) and their non-Add Health partners (NAHP), in dating, engaged, or in marital relationships, who were participants in Wave III of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health). Using both partner reports of perpetration to classify intimate partner violence (IPV) patterns resulted in 25% of couples with a MV pattern, and 75% of couples with a UV pattern; among those couples (41%) reporting any perpetrated IPV. Results also showed poorer relationship quality and higher partner sensation-seeking scores among MV and UV couples when contrasted with NV couples. Those couples with MV patterns were more likely to contain partner injury than those with UV patterns.
本研究调查了亲密伴侣暴力的非暴力(NV)、单方暴力(UV)和相互暴力(MV)模式与二元关系质量及伴侣伤害之间的关系。研究对象为1294名处于恋爱、订婚或婚姻关系中的年轻成年“青少年健康全国纵向研究”(Add Health)第三轮参与者,即Add Health伴侣(AHP)及其非Add Health伴侣(NAHP)。通过双方对暴力行为的报告来对亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)模式进行分类,结果显示,25%的情侣属于MV模式,75%的情侣属于UV模式;在报告有任何实施过的IPV行为的情侣中(占41%)。结果还表明,与NV情侣相比,MV和UV情侣的关系质量更差,伴侣的寻求刺激得分更高。与UV模式的情侣相比,MV模式的情侣更有可能出现伴侣受伤的情况。