Suppr超能文献

比较出院后干预措施对住院吸烟者的效果:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。

Comparative effectiveness of post-discharge interventions for hospitalized smokers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.

出版信息

Trials. 2012 Aug 1;13:124. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-124.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A hospital admission offers smokers an opportunity to quit. Smoking cessation counseling provided in the hospital is effective, but only if it continues for more than one month after discharge. Providing smoking cessation medication at discharge may add benefit to counseling. A major barrier to translating this research into clinical practice is sustaining treatment during the transition to outpatient care. An evidence-based, practical, cost-effective model that facilitates the continuation of tobacco treatment after discharge is needed. This paper describes the design of a comparative effectiveness trial testing a hospital-initiated intervention against standard care.

METHODS/DESIGN: A two-arm randomized controlled trial compares the effectiveness of standard post-discharge care with a multi-component smoking cessation intervention provided for three months after discharge. Current smokers admitted to Massachusetts General Hospital who receive bedside smoking cessation counseling, intend to quit after discharge and are willing to consider smoking cessation medication are eligible. Study participants are recruited following the hospital counseling visit and randomly assigned to receive Standard Care or Extended Care after hospital discharge. Standard Care includes a recommendation for a smoking cessation medication and information about community resources. Extended Care includes up to three months of free FDA-approved smoking cessation medication and five proactive computerized telephone calls that use interactive voice response technology to provide tailored motivational messages, offer additional live telephone counseling calls from a smoking cessation counselor, and facilitate medication refills. Outcomes are assessed at one, three, and six months after hospital discharge. The primary outcomes are self-reported and validated seven-day point prevalence tobacco abstinence at six months. Other outcomes include short-term and sustained smoking cessation, post-discharge utilization of smoking cessation treatment, hospital readmissions and emergency room visits, and program cost per quit.

DISCUSSION

This study tests a disseminable smoking intervention model for hospitalized smokers. If effective and widely adopted, it could help to reduce population smoking rates and thereby reduce tobacco-related mortality, morbidity, and health care costs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

United States Clinical Trials Registry NCT01177176.

摘要

背景

住院为吸烟者提供了戒烟的机会。在医院提供的戒烟咨询是有效的,但前提是在出院后持续一个月以上。在出院时提供戒烟药物可能会增加咨询的效果。将这一研究转化为临床实践的主要障碍是在过渡到门诊护理期间维持治疗。需要一种基于证据、实用且具有成本效益的模型,以促进出院后继续进行烟草治疗。本文介绍了一项比较两种效果的随机对照试验的设计,该试验测试了一种医院发起的干预措施与标准护理的效果。

方法/设计:这项双臂随机对照试验比较了标准出院后护理与出院后三个月提供的多组分戒烟干预措施的效果。符合条件的研究对象是在马萨诸塞州综合医院住院并接受床边戒烟咨询、打算在出院后戒烟且愿意考虑使用戒烟药物的当前吸烟者。研究参与者在医院咨询访问后被招募,并随机分配在出院后接受标准护理或扩展护理。标准护理包括推荐使用一种戒烟药物和有关社区资源的信息。扩展护理包括最多三个月的免费 FDA 批准的戒烟药物和五次主动的计算机电话,这些电话使用互动语音应答技术提供个性化的动机信息,提供来自戒烟咨询师的额外的现场电话咨询,以及方便药物续配。出院后一个月、三个月和六个月评估结果。主要结果是经过验证的、自我报告的六个月时的 7 天点 prevalence 烟草戒断率。其他结果包括短期和持续的戒烟、出院后戒烟治疗的使用、医院再入院和急诊就诊,以及每个戒烟者的项目成本。

讨论

这项研究测试了一种适用于住院吸烟者的可传播戒烟干预模式。如果有效并被广泛采用,它可以帮助降低人群吸烟率,从而降低与烟草相关的死亡率、发病率和医疗保健成本。

试验注册

美国临床试验注册处 NCT01177176。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d289/3487923/d94a4fe5a9d6/1745-6215-13-124-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验