• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在六个三一社区医院中实施护士主导的烟草策略干预与常规护理的传播:一项比较效果试验的研究方案。

Dissemination of the nurse-administered Tobacco Tactics intervention versus usual care in six Trinity community hospitals: study protocol for a comparative effectiveness trial.

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5482, USA.

出版信息

Trials. 2012 Aug 1;13:125. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-125.

DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-13-125
PMID:22852834
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3533810/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this smoking cessation study among hospitalized smokers are to: 1) determine provider and patient receptivity, barriers, and facilitators to implementing the nurse-administered, inpatient Tobacco Tactics intervention versus usual care using face-to-face feedback and surveys; 2) compare the effectiveness of the nurse-administered, inpatient Tobacco Tactics intervention versus usual care across hospitals, units, and patient characteristics using thirty-day point prevalence abstinence at thirty days and six months (primary outcome) post-recruitment; and 3) determine the cost-effectiveness of the nurse-administered, inpatient Tobacco Tactics intervention relative to usual care including cost per quitter, cost per life-year saved, and cost per quality-adjusted life-year saved.

METHODS/DESIGN: This effectiveness study will be a quasi-experimental design of six Michigan community hospitals of which three will get the nurse-administered Tobacco Tactics intervention and three will provide their usual care. In both the intervention and usual care sites, research assistants will collect data from patients on their smoking habits and related variables while in the hospital and at thirty days and six months post-recruitment. The intervention will be integrated into the experimental sites by a research nurse who will train Master Trainers at each intervention site. The Master Trainers, in turn, will teach the intervention to all staff nurses. Research nurses will also conduct formative evaluation with nurses to identify barriers and facilitators to dissemination.Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize the results of surveys administered to nurses, nurses' participation rates, smokers' receipt of specific cessation services, and satisfaction with services. General estimating equation analyses will be used to determine differences between intervention groups on satisfaction and quit rates, respectively, with adjustment for the clustering of patients within hospital units. Regression analyses will test the moderation of the effects of the interventions by patient characteristics. Cost-effectiveness will be assessed by constructing three ratios including cost per quitter, cost per life-year saved, and cost per quality-adjusted life-year saved.

DISCUSSION

Given that nurses represent the largest group of front-line providers, this intervention, if proven effective, has the potential for having a wide reach and thus decrease smoking, morbidity and mortality among inpatient smokers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Dissemination of Tobacco Tactics for Hospitalized Smokers NCT01309217.

摘要

背景

本项针对住院吸烟者的戒烟研究旨在:1)通过面对面反馈和调查,确定与常规护理相比,实施护士主导的住院烟草控制策略干预措施在医生和患者中接受程度如何、存在哪些障碍和促进因素;2)通过 30 天和 6 个月(主要结局)的随访评估,比较不同医院、科室和患者特征下,护士主导的住院烟草控制策略干预与常规护理的效果;3)评估护士主导的住院烟草控制策略干预与常规护理的成本效益,包括每个戒烟者的成本、每个挽救生命年的成本和每个挽救质量调整生命年的成本。

方法/设计:本项有效性研究将采用准实验设计,选择密歇根州的六家社区医院,其中三家将提供护士主导的烟草控制策略干预,三家将提供常规护理。在干预和常规护理点,研究助理将在患者住院期间以及随访的 30 天和 6 个月时收集其吸烟习惯和相关变量的数据。在实验点,研究护士将通过培训各干预点的主培训师,将干预措施融入其中。主培训师将进一步向所有护士传授干预措施。研究护士还将与护士进行形成性评估,以确定传播的障碍和促进因素。将使用描述性统计来总结对护士进行的调查结果、护士参与率、吸烟者接受特定戒烟服务的情况以及对服务的满意度。将使用一般估计方程分析来确定干预组在满意度和戒烟率上的差异,分别调整了患者在科室中的聚类。回归分析将检验患者特征对干预效果的调节作用。通过构建三个比值,包括每个戒烟者的成本、每个挽救生命年的成本和每个挽救质量调整生命年的成本,评估成本效益。

讨论

鉴于护士是最大的一线提供者群体,如果这种干预措施被证明有效,它有可能广泛推广,从而降低住院吸烟者的吸烟率、发病率和死亡率。

试验注册

Dissemination of Tobacco Tactics for Hospitalized Smokers NCT01309217。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c483/3533810/488694eb8a38/1745-6215-13-125-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c483/3533810/488694eb8a38/1745-6215-13-125-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c483/3533810/488694eb8a38/1745-6215-13-125-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Dissemination of the nurse-administered Tobacco Tactics intervention versus usual care in six Trinity community hospitals: study protocol for a comparative effectiveness trial.在六个三一社区医院中实施护士主导的烟草策略干预与常规护理的传播:一项比较效果试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2012 Aug 1;13:125. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-125.
2
Implementation of the Tobacco Tactics intervention versus usual care in Trinity Health community hospitals.在三一健康社区医院实施烟草策略干预与常规护理对比研究。
Implement Sci. 2016 Nov 4;11(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0511-6.
3
Effectiveness of the Tobacco Tactics Program in the Trinity Health System.烟草策略项目在三一健康系统中的成效。
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Oct;51(4):551-65. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.03.012.
4
Nicotine patches and quitline counseling to help hospitalized smokers stay quit: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.尼古丁贴片联合戒烟热线咨询对帮助住院吸烟者戒烟的效果:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2012 Aug 1;13:128. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-128.
5
Health and economic effects from linking bedside and outpatient tobacco cessation services for hospitalized smokers in two large hospitals: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.将住院吸烟者的床边和门诊戒烟服务相连接对健康和经济的影响:两项大型医院随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2012 Aug 1;13:129. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-129.
6
Web-based smoking cessation intervention that transitions from inpatient to outpatient: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.基于网络的戒烟干预措施,从住院患者过渡到门诊患者:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2012 Aug 1;13:123. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-123.
7
Comparative effectiveness of post-discharge interventions for hospitalized smokers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.比较出院后干预措施对住院吸烟者的效果:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2012 Aug 1;13:124. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-124.
8
A before-after implementation trial of smoking cessation guidelines in hospitalized veterans.住院退伍军人戒烟指南实施前后的试验。
Implement Sci. 2009 Sep 10;4:58. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-58.
9
Using "warm handoffs" to link hospitalized smokers with tobacco treatment after discharge: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.使用“温暖交接”在出院后将住院吸烟者与烟草治疗联系起来:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2012 Aug 1;13:127. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-127.
10
Cost-effectiveness of a nurse-delivered, inpatient smoking cessation intervention.护士主导的住院患者戒烟干预的成本效益。
Transl Behav Med. 2020 Dec 31;10(6):1481-1490. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz101.

引用本文的文献

1
Smoking cessation for improving mental health.戒烟以改善心理健康。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;3(3):CD013522. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013522.pub2.
2
Nurse-Driven mHealth Implementation Using the Technology Inpatient Program for Smokers (TIPS): Mixed Methods Study.护士主导的使用 Technology Inpatient Program for Smokers(TIPS)进行移动医疗实施:混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Oct 4;7(10):e14331. doi: 10.2196/14331.
3
Cost-effectiveness of a nurse-delivered, inpatient smoking cessation intervention.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of a hospital-based tobacco treatment service: outcomes and lessons learned.医院烟草治疗服务评估:结果与经验教训。
J Hosp Med. 2011 Apr;6(4):211-8. doi: 10.1002/jhm.835. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
2
An interactive voice response system to continue a hospital-based smoking cessation intervention after discharge.一种交互式语音应答系统,用于在出院后继续进行基于医院的戒烟干预。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2011 Apr;13(4):255-60. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq248. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
3
An evaluation of recent federal spending on comparative effectiveness research: priorities, gaps, and next steps.
护士主导的住院患者戒烟干预的成本效益。
Transl Behav Med. 2020 Dec 31;10(6):1481-1490. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz101.
4
Implementation of the Tobacco Tactics intervention versus usual care in Trinity Health community hospitals.在三一健康社区医院实施烟草策略干预与常规护理对比研究。
Implement Sci. 2016 Nov 4;11(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0511-6.
5
CHARTing a Path to Pragmatic Tobacco Treatment Research.绘制实用烟草治疗研究之路
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Oct;51(4):630-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.025.
6
Smoking-Cessation Interventions for Urban Hospital Patients: A Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial.城市医院患者戒烟干预措施:一项随机对照疗效试验
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Oct;51(4):566-77. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.06.023.
7
Effectiveness of the Tobacco Tactics Program in the Trinity Health System.烟草策略项目在三一健康系统中的成效。
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Oct;51(4):551-65. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.03.012.
8
Combined pharmacotherapy and behavioural interventions for smoking cessation.联合药物疗法与行为干预以戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 24;3(3):CD008286. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008286.pub3.
9
Fidelity monitoring across the seven studies in the Consortium of Hospitals Advancing Research on Tobacco (CHART).烟草研究推进医院联盟(CHART)七项研究中的保真度监测。
Tob Induc Dis. 2015 Sep 3;13(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12971-015-0056-5. eCollection 2015.
10
Health care expenditures attributable to smoking in military veterans.退伍军人吸烟导致的医疗保健支出。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 May;17(5):586-91. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu187. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
评估近期联邦政府在比较有效性研究上的支出:重点、差距和下一步。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Oct;29(10):1768-76. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0687.
4
Implementation of the Tobacco Tactics program in the Department of Veterans Affairs.在退伍军人事务部实施烟草策略计划。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jan;25 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):3-10. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1075-9.
5
Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence vs heavy smoking index in a general population survey.在一项普通人群调查中,尼古丁依赖 Fagerstrom 测试与重度吸烟指数的比较。
BMC Public Health. 2009 Dec 30;9:493. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-493.
6
Increasing smoking cessation care provision in hospitals: a meta-analysis of intervention effect.增加医院戒烟护理服务:干预效果的荟萃分析
Nicotine Tob Res. 2009 Jun;11(6):650-62. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntp056. Epub 2009 May 7.
7
In-hospital smoking cessation programs: what do VA patients and staff want and need?医院内戒烟项目:退伍军人事务部的患者和工作人员想要什么,需要什么?
Appl Nurs Res. 2008 Nov;21(4):199-206. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2006.11.002.
8
Usual care as the control group in clinical trials of nonpharmacologic interventions.在非药物干预临床试验中作为对照组的常规护理。
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2007 Oct 1;4(7):577-82. doi: 10.1513/pats.200706-072JK.
9
Depressive symptoms, smoking, drinking, and quality of life among head and neck cancer patients.头颈癌患者的抑郁症状、吸烟、饮酒及生活质量
Psychosomatics. 2007 Mar-Apr;48(2):142-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.48.2.142.
10
A tailored smoking, alcohol, and depression intervention for head and neck cancer patients.为头颈癌患者量身定制的吸烟、饮酒及抑郁症干预措施。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Nov;15(11):2203-8. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0880.