Center for Healthcare Studies, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Center for Health Statistics, Departments of Medicine and Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Transl Behav Med. 2020 Dec 31;10(6):1481-1490. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz101.
Randomized controlled trials have shown that inpatient tobacco cessation interventions are highly efficacious and cost-effective. However, the degree to which smoking interventions implemented in nonrandomized, real-world practice settings are effective, and consequently, cost-effective, remains unclear. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of a nurse-delivered, inpatient smoking cessation intervention, Tobacco Tactics, compared with usual care within the context of an observational, real-world study design. In this quasi-experimental study, five Michigan hospitals (N = 1,370 patients) were assigned to implement either Tobacco Tactics or usual care during October 2011-May 2013. Statistical analysis was conducted during January 2017-February 2018. Controlling for confounding using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weights, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were generated. The per person cost of tobacco cessation services in the intervention group exceeded that of usual care ($175.52 vs. $67.80; p < .001). The intervention group had a higher propensity-adjusted self-reported quit rate compared to the control group (15.7% vs. 7.0%; p < .0001). The propensity-adjusted incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $1,325 per quit (95% confidence interval: $751-$2,462), with 99.9% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness to pay of $5,000 per quit. The Tobacco Tactics intervention was found to be cost-effective and well within the range of incremental cost-per-quit findings from other studies of tobacco cessation interventions, which range from $918 to $23,200, adjusted for inflation.
随机对照试验表明,住院戒烟干预措施非常有效且具有成本效益。然而,在非随机、真实实践环境中实施的吸烟干预措施的有效性,以及因此的成本效益,尚不清楚。本研究评估了一种由护士实施的、针对住院患者的戒烟干预措施——烟草策略(Tobacco Tactics),与常规护理相比,在观察性、真实世界研究设计的背景下,该措施的成本效益。在这项准实验研究中,密歇根州的五家医院(N=1370 名患者)被分配在 2011 年 10 月至 2013 年 5 月期间实施烟草策略或常规护理。统计分析于 2017 年 1 月至 2018 年 2 月进行。通过稳定的逆概率治疗权重控制混杂因素,计算增量成本效益比,并生成成本效益可接受性曲线。干预组的戒烟服务人均成本高于常规护理组(175.52 美元比 67.80 美元;p<0.001)。与对照组相比,干预组有更高的倾向调整后自我报告的戒烟率(15.7%比 7.0%;p<0.0001)。倾向调整后的增量成本效益比为每戒烟一例 1325 美元(95%置信区间:751-2462 美元),在愿意支付每例戒烟 5000 美元的情况下,有 99.9%的可能性是具有成本效益的。烟草策略干预措施被认为是具有成本效益的,并且远低于其他烟草干预措施研究中每例戒烟增量成本的范围,从 918 美元到 23200 美元,经通胀调整。