• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在炎症性肠病患者中,使用酶联免疫吸附试验重复检测艰难梭菌可提高诊断率。

Repeat stool testing for Clostridium difficile using enzyme immunoassay in patients with inflammatory bowel disease increases diagnostic yield.

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland, OH 44106-4984, USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Sep;28(9):1553-60. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.717529. Epub 2012 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1185/03007995.2012.717529
PMID:22852871
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing. CDI is diagnosed by toxin enzyme immunoassay (EIA) or real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) performed on stool samples. An earlier study evaluating EIA in IBD patients with CDI suggested that more than one stool sample be tested to increase diagnostic yield. We investigated whether repeat stool testing improves diagnostic accuracy for CDI in hospitalized IBD patients compared to hospitalized patients with CDI and no IBD.

METHODS

We performed retrospective data analysis from January 2005-May 2011 on 63,086 hospitalized patients who were tested for CDI using EIA or PCR. Of these, 2579 patients had IBD. Transition probabilities were calculated based on results from repeated tests.

RESULTS

Inclusive of all inpatients tested for CDI, 56,583 were tested using toxin EIA and 6503 were tested using PCR. In patients with no IBD, the first stool sample tested was positive in 90% and 94% with EIA and PCR respectively. In IBD patients tested using EIA, 101 were diagnosed with CDI. The first stool sample tested was positive in 81% of patients. Successive second and third stool samples yielded additional 14% and 5% CDI positive IBD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one in five IBD patients with CDI required repeat testing to yield a positive result with EIA. There are minimal diagnostic gains of repeat testing by EIA or PCR in patients without IBD. We recommend repeat stool testing for CDI when using EIA to increase diagnostic yield in IBD patients.

摘要

背景

炎症性肠病(IBD)患者中艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的发病率和严重程度正在增加。CDI 通过对粪便样本进行毒素酶免疫测定(EIA)或实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)来诊断。先前一项评估 CDI 中 IBD 患者 EIA 的研究表明,为了提高诊断率,需要对多个粪便样本进行检测。我们研究了与患有 CDI 且无 IBD 的住院患者相比,重复粪便检测是否可以提高住院 IBD 患者 CDI 的诊断准确性。

方法

我们对 2005 年 1 月至 2011 年 5 月期间使用 EIA 或 PCR 检测 CDI 的 63086 名住院患者进行了回顾性数据分析。其中 2579 名患者患有 IBD。基于重复测试的结果计算了转移概率。

结果

包括所有接受 CDI 检测的住院患者,56583 名患者使用毒素 EIA 检测,6503 名患者使用 PCR 检测。在无 IBD 的患者中,EIA 和 PCR 分别有 90%和 94%的患者第一次粪便样本检测呈阳性。在接受 EIA 检测的 IBD 患者中,有 101 名被诊断为 CDI。第一次粪便样本检测呈阳性的患者占 81%。连续的第二和第三个粪便样本又检出了 14%和 5%的 CDI 阳性 IBD 患者。

结论

大约五分之一的 CDI 合并 IBD 的患者需要重复检测才能使 EIA 结果呈阳性。对于无 IBD 的患者,重复 EIA 或 PCR 检测的诊断收益很小。我们建议在使用 EIA 时对 CDI 进行重复粪便检测,以提高 IBD 患者的诊断率。

相似文献

1
Repeat stool testing for Clostridium difficile using enzyme immunoassay in patients with inflammatory bowel disease increases diagnostic yield.在炎症性肠病患者中,使用酶联免疫吸附试验重复检测艰难梭菌可提高诊断率。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Sep;28(9):1553-60. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.717529. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
2
Repeat stool testing to diagnose Clostridium difficile infection using enzyme immunoassay does not increase diagnostic yield.采用酶免疫分析法重复粪便检测诊断艰难梭菌感染并不能提高诊断率。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Aug;9(8):665-669.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.04.030. Epub 2011 May 13.
3
Diagnostic value of repeated enzyme immunoassays in Clostridium difficile infection.重复酶免疫测定在艰难梭菌感染中的诊断价值
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Aug;104(8):2035-41. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.174. Epub 2009 Apr 14.
4
Impact of the type of diagnostic assay on Clostridium difficile infection and complication rates in a mandatory reporting program.诊断检测类型对强制性报告程序中艰难梭菌感染和并发症发生率的影响。
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Jan;56(1):67-73. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis840. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
5
Comparison of testing approaches for Clostridium difficile infection at a large community hospital.大型社区医院艰难梭菌感染检测方法的比较。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Jan;20(1):65-9. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12198. Epub 2013 Mar 23.
6
Clostridium difficile infection in acute flares of inflammatory bowel disease: A prospective study.炎症性肠病急性发作期艰难梭菌感染:一项前瞻性研究。
Dig Liver Dis. 2017 Jun;49(6):643-646. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.01.162. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
7
An evaluation of repeat stool testing for Clostridium difficile infection by polymerase chain reaction.对聚合酶链反应检测艰难梭菌感染重复粪便检测的评估。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012 Nov-Dec;46(10):846-9. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182432273.
8
Two-step glutamate dehydrogenase antigen real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.两步谷氨酸脱氢酶抗原实时聚合酶链反应检测产毒艰难梭菌。
J Hosp Infect. 2010 Jan;74(1):48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.08.014. Epub 2009 Nov 8.
9
Non-Clostridium difficile Bacterial Infections Are Rare in Patients With Flares of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.非艰难梭菌细菌感染在炎症性肠病发作患者中罕见。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Apr;16(4):528-533. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Oct 14.
10
Low glutamate dehydrogenase levels are associated with colonization in Clostridium difficile PCR-only positive patients with inflammatory bowel disease.谷氨酸脱氢酶水平低与炎症性肠病中仅聚合酶链反应阳性的艰难梭菌定植患者相关。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Sep;32(9):1099-1105. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001762.

引用本文的文献

1
[Treatment of severe flares in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis].[克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎严重发作的治疗]
Inn Med (Heidelb). 2025 Jan;66(1):22-30. doi: 10.1007/s00108-024-01825-w. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
2
Acute severe ulcerative colitis: management advice for internal medicine and emergency physicians.急性重度溃疡性结肠炎:内科和急诊医师的管理建议。
Intern Emerg Med. 2021 Sep;16(6):1433-1442. doi: 10.1007/s11739-021-02704-0. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
3
A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) and Algorithms Including NAATs for the Diagnosis of () in Adults.
一项关于核酸扩增检测(NAATs)和包括 NAATs 在内的算法在诊断成人()中的实验室医学最佳实践系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019 May 29;32(3). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00032-18. Print 2019 Jun 19.
4
Clostridium difficile infection in inflammatory bowel disease: challenges in diagnosis and treatment.炎症性肠病中的艰难梭菌感染:诊断与治疗挑战
Clin J Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr;10(2):112-123. doi: 10.1007/s12328-017-0719-2. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
5
Managing Clostridium difficile in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).炎症性肠病(IBD)中艰难梭菌的管理
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2014;16(7):393. doi: 10.1007/s11894-014-0393-1.
6
[Diagnostic options. Indications and validity].[诊断选项。适应症及有效性]
Internist (Berl). 2014 Aug;55(8):898-905. doi: 10.1007/s00108-013-3441-2.
7
Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: an ongoing conundrum for clinicians and for clinical laboratories.艰难梭菌感染的诊断:临床医生和临床实验室面临的持续难题。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013 Jul;26(3):604-30. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00016-13.