Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, USA.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Aug;9(8):665-669.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.04.030. Epub 2011 May 13.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a hospital-acquired infection with increasing incidence and severity. The most frequently used test to diagnose CDI is an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for toxins A and B in stool samples. It is common to test 2 or more stool samples, based on the assumption that this detects CDI with greater sensitivity than analysis of 1 sample. We investigated whether repeat stool testing significantly improves the diagnostic yield for CDI.
We performed a retrospective analysis of hospitalized patients who were tested for CDI using EIA. From year 2005 to 2008, 39,402 stool samples from 17,971 patients with 29,373 diarrhea episodes were tested. Transition probabilities were calculated based on results from repeated tests.
A total of 2692 diarrheal episodes (9.17%) were diagnosed with CDI. Based on results of 3 consecutive tests, 2675 (99.36%) were diagnosed with CDI. The first stool sample tested produced positive results for 90.7% of cases. When samples were tested consecutively, for the second and third time, an additional 6.6% and 2% patients had positive test results, respectively. If the first test result was negative, the probability of the second test result being positive was 2.7%. If the first 2 test results were negative, the probability of the third test result being positive was 2.3%.
In patients who had multiple stool samples tested for CDI by EIA, almost 91% were accurately diagnosed based on the results of a single stool sample alone. Subsequent testing yielded a positive result in only 8.6% of patients. We therefore recommend that repeat testing not be done on a routine basis because it does not significantly improve diagnostic yield.
艰难梭菌感染(CDI)是一种医院获得性感染,其发病率和严重程度不断增加。最常用于诊断 CDI 的检测方法是粪便样本中毒素 A 和 B 的酶免疫分析(EIA)。通常会测试 2 个或更多粪便样本,这是基于这样一种假设,即与分析 1 个样本相比,这种方法可以提高 CDI 的检测灵敏度。我们研究了重复粪便检测是否能显著提高 CDI 的诊断率。
我们对使用 EIA 检测 CDI 的住院患者进行了回顾性分析。在 2005 年至 2008 年间,对 17971 名患者的 29373 次腹泻发作的 39402 份粪便样本进行了检测。基于重复检测的结果计算了转移概率。
共有 2692 次腹泻发作(9.17%)被诊断为 CDI。基于连续 3 次检测结果,2675 次(99.36%)被诊断为 CDI。第一次粪便样本检测的阳性率为 90.7%。连续检测第二次和第三次时,分别有 6.6%和 2%的患者检测结果为阳性。如果第一次检测结果为阴性,第二次检测结果为阳性的概率为 2.7%。如果前两次检测结果均为阴性,第三次检测结果为阳性的概率为 2.3%。
在接受 EIA 检测 CDI 的多次粪便样本的患者中,几乎 91%的患者仅根据单次粪便样本的结果即可得到准确诊断。只有 8.6%的患者随后的检测结果呈阳性。因此,我们建议不要常规进行重复检测,因为它不会显著提高诊断率。