Wearden John H, Jones Luke A
School of Psychology, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(1):179-99. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.704928. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
The article discusses interpretation of between-group differences in performance on timing tasks. First, it is shown that differences in internal clock "pacemaker speed" cannot normally be used as a coherent explanation of obtained effects, even if such differences in pacemaker speed exist. Secondly, it is shown how, in theory, modelling of performance on commonly used timing tasks like bisection and temporal generalization can illuminate between-group effects. Thirdly, the article discusses some examples of such modelling from published work and shows how some between-group differences--for example, between children of different ages, or between patients and controls--have been explained. Finally, some ambiguities in modelling are discussed--for example, the fact that different explanations of differences in performance on timing tasks between groups may be difficult or impossible to distinguish in practice.
本文讨论了计时任务表现中组间差异的解释。首先,研究表明,即使内部时钟“起搏器速度”存在差异,通常也不能将其作为对所获效应的连贯解释。其次,本文展示了在理论上,对常用计时任务(如二分法和时间泛化)表现的建模如何能够阐明组间效应。第三,本文讨论了已发表研究中此类建模的一些示例,并展示了一些组间差异(例如不同年龄儿童之间,或患者与对照组之间的差异)是如何得到解释的。最后,本文讨论了建模中的一些模糊之处,例如,在实践中可能难以或无法区分对组间计时任务表现差异的不同解释这一事实。