Suppr超能文献

[成人冠心病监护病房使用肺动脉导管进行无创温度测量检测发热的准确性、精密度和有效性]

[Accuracy, precision, and validity of fever detection using non-invasive temperature measurement in adult coronary care unit patients with pulmonary catheters].

作者信息

Joo Gaeul, Sohng Kyeong-Yae

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Kyungin Women's College, Incheon, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Acad Nurs. 2012 Jun;42(3):424-33. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2012.42.3.424.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the accuracy, precision and validity of fever detection of tympanic membrane (TM), temporal artery (TA) and axillary temperature (AT) compared with pulmonary artery temperature (PA).

METHODS

Repeated-measures design was conducted for one year on 83 adult cardiac care unit patients with pulmonary artery catheters after open heart surgery. Sequential temperature measurements were taken three times at 20-minute intervals. Accuracy, precision, repeatability, and validity of fever detection were analyzed.

RESULTS

Mean pulmonary artery temperature was 37.04°C (SD 0.70°C). The mean (SD) offsets from PA, with the mean reflecting accuracy and SD reflecting precision, were -1.31°C (0.75°C) for TA, -0.20°C (0.24°C) for TM, and -0.97°C (0.64°C) for AT. Percentage of pairs with differences within ±0.5°C was 9.6% for TA, 19.7% for AT, and 91.6% for TM. Repeated measurements with all three methods had mean SD values within 0.04°C. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of tympanic measurements were 0.76, 1.0, and 1.0, and 0.90, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Results show that TM best reflects PA, and is most consistent, accurate, and precise. AT tends to underestimate PA, and TA is least accurate and precise. Therefore tympanic membrane measurement is a reliable alternative to other non-invasive methods of measuring temperatures.

摘要

目的

比较鼓膜温度(TM)、颞动脉温度(TA)和腋温(AT)与肺动脉温度(PA)测量发热的准确性、精密度和有效性。

方法

对83例心脏直视手术后带有肺动脉导管的成人心脏监护病房患者进行了为期一年的重复测量设计。每隔20分钟依次测量三次体温。分析了发热检测的准确性、精密度、可重复性和有效性。

结果

肺动脉平均温度为37.04°C(标准差0.70°C)。与PA的平均(标准差)偏差,均值反映准确性,标准差反映精密度,TA为-1.31°C(0.75°C),TM为-0.20°C(0.24°C),AT为-0.97°C(0.64°C)。差值在±0.5°C以内的配对百分比,TA为9.6%,AT为19.7%,TM为91.6%。三种方法的重复测量标准差均值均在0.04°C以内。鼓膜测量的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为0.76、1.0、1.0和0.90。

结论

结果表明,TM最能反映PA,且最具一致性、准确性和精密度。AT往往低估PA,而TA的准确性和精密度最低。因此,鼓膜测量是其他非侵入性体温测量方法的可靠替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验