• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

追踪非饲料喂养牛所生产的碎牛肉中沙门氏菌的来源。

Tracking the sources of salmonella in ground beef produced from nonfed cattle.

机构信息

IEH Laboratories and Consulting Group, 15300 Bothell Way N.E., Lake Forest Park, WA 98155, USA.

出版信息

J Food Prot. 2012 Aug;75(8):1464-8. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-540.

DOI:10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-540
PMID:22856570
Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the source(s) of Salmonella contamination in ground beef. One hundred dairy cows were harvested in a U.S. commercial beef processing plant. Samples of hides, carcasses after hide removal and before exposure to antimicrobial intervention, carcasses after all antimicrobial interventions, superficial cervical lymph nodes from the chuck, trim, ground beef, and air were obtained. Ninety-six percent of the hide samples, 47% of the carcasses before intervention, 18% of the lymph nodes, 7.14% of the trim, and 1.67% of the ground beef samples were positive for Salmonella. None of the samples obtained from the carcasses after the full complement of interventions and none of the air samples were positive for Salmonella. All Salmonella-positive samples were subjected to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and eight DNA Xba I restriction patterns were identified. The majority of isolates had one of two restriction digest patterns. The strain isolated from ground beef had the same pattern as the strains isolated from hides and from carcasses immediately after hide removal. The Salmonella isolates from trim samples and lymph nodes also had the same restriction digest pattern. These results indicate that hide and lymph nodes are the most likely sources of Salmonella in ground beef. Dressing practices that effectively reduce or eliminate the transfer of bacteria from hide to carcass and elimination of lymph nodes as a component of raw ground beef should be considered as measures to reduce Salmonella contamination of ground beef. Because total elimination of lymph nodes from ground beef is not possible, other approaches should be explored. Easily accessible lymph nodes could be screened for Salmonella very early in the slaughter process. When the results are positive for Salmonella, the corresponding carcasses should be fabricated separately at the end of the production run, and the trim from these carcasses should be subjected to a treatment that destroys Salmonella.

摘要

本研究旨在确定碎牛肉中沙门氏菌的污染来源。在美国的一家商业牛肉加工厂,对 100 头奶牛进行了屠宰。采集了牛皮、去皮后的胴体(在进行抗菌干预之前)、所有抗菌干预后的胴体、肩部的浅表颈淋巴结、修整料、碎牛肉和空气样本。96%的牛皮样本、47%的干预前胴体、18%的淋巴结、7.14%的修整料和 1.67%的碎牛肉样本呈沙门氏菌阳性。在进行完所有抗菌干预措施后,从胴体中获得的所有样本以及空气中的样本均未检测到沙门氏菌。所有检测呈阳性的沙门氏菌样本均进行了脉冲场凝胶电泳,共鉴定出 8 种 Xba I 限制酶图谱。多数分离株有两种限制酶图谱之一。从碎牛肉中分离出的菌株与从牛皮和去皮后立即的胴体中分离出的菌株具有相同的图谱。从修整料和淋巴结中分离出的沙门氏菌分离株也具有相同的限制酶图谱。这些结果表明,牛皮和淋巴结是碎牛肉中沙门氏菌的最可能来源。应考虑采取一些措施,如对牛体进行有效处理,降低或消除细菌从牛皮向胴体的转移,以及不将淋巴结作为生碎牛肉的组成部分,以减少碎牛肉中沙门氏菌的污染。由于无法将淋巴结从碎牛肉中完全去除,因此应探索其他方法。可以在屠宰过程的早期非常容易地对易接近的淋巴结进行沙门氏菌筛查。当结果呈沙门氏菌阳性时,应在生产结束时将相应的胴体单独加工,并对这些胴体的修整料进行处理,以消灭沙门氏菌。

相似文献

1
Tracking the sources of salmonella in ground beef produced from nonfed cattle.追踪非饲料喂养牛所生产的碎牛肉中沙门氏菌的来源。
J Food Prot. 2012 Aug;75(8):1464-8. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-540.
2
Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella in bovine lymph nodes potentially destined for use in ground beef.用于制作碎牛肉的牛淋巴结中沙门氏菌的流行情况及特征
J Food Prot. 2008 Aug;71(8):1685-8. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-71.8.1685.
3
Salmonella prevalence in bovine lymph nodes differs among feedyards.牛淋巴结中的沙门氏菌流行率在各饲养场之间存在差异。
J Food Prot. 2012 Jun;75(6):1131-3. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-530.
4
Isolation and characterization of Clostridium difficile associated with beef cattle and commercially produced ground beef.从肉牛和商业化生产的绞碎牛肉中分离和鉴定艰难梭菌。
J Food Prot. 2013 Feb;76(2):256-64. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-261.
5
Effects of a minimal hide wash cabinet on the levels and prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella on the hides of beef cattle at slaughter.一个简易牛皮清洗柜对屠宰肉牛牛皮上大肠杆菌O157:H7和沙门氏菌水平及流行率的影响。
J Food Prot. 2007 May;70(5):1076-9. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-70.5.1076.
6
Microbiological analysis of bovine lymph nodes for the detection of Salmonella enterica.牛淋巴结中沙门氏菌检测的微生物学分析。
J Food Prot. 2012 May;75(5):854-8. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-434.
7
Prevalence and characteristics of Salmonella in the beef chain in the Republic of Ireland.爱尔兰共和国牛肉产业链中沙门氏菌的流行情况及特征
Zoonoses Public Health. 2014 Dec;61(8):534-6. doi: 10.1111/zph.12099. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
8
Effect of chemical dehairing on the prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and the levels of aerobic bacteria and enterobacteriaceae on carcasses in a commercial beef processing plant.化学脱毛对商业牛肉加工厂胴体中大肠杆菌O157:H7的流行率以及需氧菌和肠杆菌科细菌水平的影响。
J Food Prot. 2003 Nov;66(11):2005-9. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-66.11.2005.
9
Source tracking of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella contamination in the lairage environment at commercial U.S. beef processing plants and identification of an effective intervention.美国商业牛肉加工厂牲畜圈环境中大肠杆菌O157:H7和沙门氏菌污染的溯源及有效干预措施的确定
J Food Prot. 2008 Sep;71(9):1752-60. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-71.9.1752.
10
Low Prevalence of Salmonella and Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Lymph Nodes of Australian Beef Cattle.澳大利亚肉牛淋巴结中沙门氏菌和产志贺毒素大肠杆菌的低流行率
J Food Prot. 2017 Dec;80(12):2105-2111. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-17-180.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrated Whole-Genome Sequencing and In Silico Characterization of Cerro and Schwarzengrund from Brazil.巴西塞罗和施瓦岑格鲁德的全基因组测序整合及计算机模拟特征分析
Genes (Basel). 2025 Jul 26;16(8):880. doi: 10.3390/genes16080880.
2
Effects of feeding 10-G direct-fed microbial on feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, and prevalence of in subiliac lymph nodes of feedlot steers.给育肥牛饲喂10-G直接投喂微生物对其育肥性能、胴体特征及髂下淋巴结中[此处原文缺失相关内容]患病率的影响。
Transl Anim Sci. 2025 Apr 14;9:txaf050. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaf050. eCollection 2025.
3
Comparison of peracetic acid and bacteriophage application by vascular rinsing on Salmonella reduction in lymph nodes of goat carcasses.
过氧乙酸和噬菌体通过血管冲洗在降低山羊胴体淋巴结中沙门氏菌数量方面的比较。
J Food Sci. 2025 Apr;90(4):e70203. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.70203.
4
Long-term genomic surveillance reveals the circulation of clinically significant Salmonella in lymph nodes and beef trimmings from slaughter cattle from a Mexican feedlot.长期的基因组监测揭示了来自墨西哥饲养场屠宰牛的淋巴结和牛肉切块中具有临床意义的沙门氏菌的循环。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 18;19(10):e0312275. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312275. eCollection 2024.
5
The effect of a direct-fed microbial (10-G) on live animal performance, carcass characteristics, and prevalence of fed beef heifers.直接投喂微生物(10-G)对育肥牛小母牛活体性能、胴体特征及患病率的影响。
Transl Anim Sci. 2024 May 29;8:txae086. doi: 10.1093/tas/txae086. eCollection 2024.
6
An Experimental Field Trial Investigating the Use of Bacteriophage and Manure Slurry Applications in Beef Cattle Feedlot Pens for Mitigation.一项关于在肉牛饲养场围栏中使用噬菌体和粪肥泥浆以减轻影响的试验性田间试验。
Animals (Basel). 2023 Oct 11;13(20):3170. doi: 10.3390/ani13203170.
7
Efficacy of Common Antimicrobial Interventions at and above Regulatory Allowable Pick-Up Levels on Pathogen Reduction.在及高于监管允许的采集水平下,常见抗菌干预措施对病原体减少的效果。
Foods. 2023 Feb 18;12(4):883. doi: 10.3390/foods12040883.
8
Effect of a direct-fed microbial (10-G Armor) on feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, and prevalence of in fed-beef heifers.直接投喂微生物制剂(10-G Armor)对育肥牛小母牛育肥性能、胴体特征及[此处原文缺失相关内容]患病率的影响。
Transl Anim Sci. 2022 May 26;6(3):txac073. doi: 10.1093/tas/txac073. eCollection 2022 Jul.
9
Metaphylactic antimicrobial effects on occurrences of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. measured longitudinally from feedlot arrival to harvest in high-risk beef cattle.从高风险肉牛到达牛舍到收获的纵向时间范围内,研究了在沙门氏菌、大肠杆菌和肠球菌属中预防性使用抗菌药物对耐药性发生的影响。
J Appl Microbiol. 2022 Sep;133(3):1940-1955. doi: 10.1111/jam.15691. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
10
Kinome Analysis of Cattle Peripheral Lymph Nodes to Elucidate Differential Response to spp.牛外周淋巴结的激酶组分析以阐明对……种的差异反应
Microorganisms. 2022 Jan 7;10(1):120. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10010120.