• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[National and regional prioritisation in Swedish health care: experiences from cardiology].

作者信息

Carlsson Jörg

机构信息

Linnæus University and Medicinska kliniken, Länssjukhuset i Kalmar, Schweden.

出版信息

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(6):435-42. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.zefq.2012.06.002
PMID:22857731
Abstract

Prioritisation of medical services in Sweden takes place on two different levels. On the national level, the Swedish priority guidelines ascribe priority values ranging from 1 (high priority) to 10 (low priority) to measures (in terms of condition-treatment pairs) of prevention, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation of cardiovascular diseases. In addition, this list contains interventions that should be avoided and those that should only be provided as part of clinical research projects. The government then commissions a multi-professional team under the supervision of the National Board of Health and Welfare "Socialstyelsen" with the development of corresponding guidelines. In addition to the scientific evidence, the priority lists incorporate ethical and economical aspects and are based on the so-called ethics platform consisting of human dignity, needs, solidarity and cost-effectiveness. At the other level of prioritisation there are regional projects aiming at the in- and exclusion of medical measures. The Swedish prioritisation process will be described using the example of priority lists in cardiology. (As supplied by publisher).

摘要

相似文献

1
[National and regional prioritisation in Swedish health care: experiences from cardiology].
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(6):435-42. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
2
[Prioritization is actually quite a self-evident evaluation process, however it may not supplant the important debate about rationalization (interview by Heiner Raspe and Sabine Stumpf)].
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(6):404-6. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.06.011. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
3
[Critical reflections on the prioritisation debate: are we setting the right priorities to address our prioritisation challenges?].对优先事项辩论的批判性反思:我们是否在设定正确的优先事项以应对优先事项方面的挑战?
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(6):397-403. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.06.003. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
4
[Rationing health care by thresholds for clinical benefit and its acceptance by the German population].[通过临床获益阈值分配医疗保健及其被德国民众接受的情况]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(6):426-34. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.06.008. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
5
[The practice of prioritising--using the example of the Swedish cardiology guideline].[优先排序的实践——以瑞典心脏病学指南为例]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2009;103(2):92-8. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2009.02.013.
6
[Priority setting in healthcare. What can Germany learn from other countries?].[医疗保健中的优先事项设定。德国能从其他国家学到什么?]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2010 Sep;53(9):882-9. doi: 10.1007/s00103-010-1115-y.
7
[Deliberative participation of citizens in the prioritisation debate: what is their contribution?].公民在优先事项辩论中的审议性参与:他们的贡献是什么?
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(6):418-25. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.06.009. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
8
[What kind of debate on prioritisation do we need for the benefit of our health system and society?].为了我们的医疗系统和社会的利益,我们需要进行什么样的关于优先事项的辩论?
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(6):383-5. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
9
[Democratic institutional design in health care priority setting and rationing].[医疗保健资源分配优先级设定与配给中的民主制度设计]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(6):407-11. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
10
[How can priorities be set in medical services? A Swedish model].[如何在医疗服务中设定优先事项?瑞典模式]
Gesundheitswesen. 2009 Oct;71(10):617-22. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1239570. Epub 2009 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Criteria for fairly allocating scarce health-care resources to genetic tests: which matter most?公平分配稀缺医疗资源用于基因检测的标准:哪些因素最为重要?
Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Jan;22(1):25-31. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.172. Epub 2013 Aug 7.