Suppr超能文献

双相情感障碍躁狂症的多变量分析:回顾性评估随机临床试验参与者中双相 I 型躁狂和混合发作的结构。

Multivariate analysis of bipolar mania: retrospectively assessed structure of bipolar I manic and mixed episodes in randomized clinical trial participants.

机构信息

University of Texas, Houston Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2013 Jan 10;144(1-2):59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.05.061. Epub 2012 Aug 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Manic episodes are heterogeneous. Mixed states may differ in important clinical characteristics from other manic episodes. However, it has not been established whether mixed states are a distinct type of episodes, or a common basic structure exists across manic episodes.

METHODS

Using 2179 well-characterized subjects in the pretreatment phase of six randomized, clinical trials, we conducted rotated factor analysis followed by cluster analysis, using all items from the Young Mania Rating Scale and the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Scale. Analyses were conducted for all subjects (n=2179) and for those in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) mixed (n=644) and non-mixed (n=1535) episodes separately.

RESULTS

There were five factors characterized (in order of variance accounted for) as depression, mania, sleep disturbance, judgment/impulsivity and irritability/hostility. Cluster analysis identified five clusters. Three were predominately manic, with depression scores below average for the overall group. Two had high average depression scores; these clusters differed in irritability/hostility. Judgment/impulsivity scores were similar across factors. Essentially identical factors and clusters existed whether analyses were done in all subjects or only in subjects classified by DSM-IV as mixed or non-mixed.

LIMITATIONS

Exclusion criteria of studies may limit generalizability of findings.

DISCUSSION

All manic episodes, whether mixed or non-mixed, shared a similar structure according to factor/cluster analysis. Patients with high depression factor scores were heterogeneous with respect to irritability. These data suggest that depressive symptoms should be considered a dimensional property across manic episodes, rather than as defining a specific type of episode.

摘要

背景

躁狂发作具有异质性。混合状态在重要的临床特征上可能与其他躁狂发作不同。然而,混合状态是否是一种独特的发作类型,或者在躁狂发作中是否存在共同的基本结构尚未确定。

方法

我们使用六项随机临床试验的预处理阶段的 2179 名特征明确的受试者,使用 Young Mania Rating Scale 和 Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Scale 的所有项目进行旋转因子分析,然后进行聚类分析。分析针对所有受试者(n=2179)和诊断和统计手册第四版(DSM-IV)混合(n=644)和非混合(n=1535)发作的受试者分别进行。

结果

有五个特征性因子(按方差解释的顺序),分别为抑郁、躁狂、睡眠障碍、判断力/冲动性和易怒/敌意。聚类分析确定了五个簇。其中三个主要为躁狂,整体组的抑郁评分低于平均水平。两个簇的平均抑郁评分较高;这些簇在易怒/敌意方面存在差异。判断力/冲动性评分在各因子之间相似。无论在所有受试者中还是仅在 DSM-IV 分类为混合或非混合的受试者中进行分析,都存在基本相同的因子和簇。

局限性

研究的排除标准可能限制研究结果的普遍性。

讨论

根据因子/聚类分析,所有躁狂发作,无论是混合还是非混合,都具有相似的结构。具有较高抑郁因子评分的患者在易怒方面存在异质性。这些数据表明,抑郁症状应被视为躁狂发作的一个维度特征,而不是定义特定类型的发作。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验