VA Palo Alto Health Care System, 3801 Miranda Avenue, Mail Code 151 T, Building 4, 3rd Floor, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA ; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, 1977 Butler Blvd Suite E4.400, Houston, TX 77030 USA.
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2015 May 5;3:11. doi: 10.1186/s40345-015-0026-0. eCollection 2015.
A previous factor analysis of Young Mania Rating Scale and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale items identified composite factors of depression, mania, sleep disturbance, judgment/impulsivity, and irritability/hostility as major components of psychiatric symptoms in acute mania or mixed episodes in a series of trials of antipsychotics. However, it is unknown whether these factors predict treatment outcome.
Data from six double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trials with aripiprazole in acute manic or mixed episodes in adults with bipolar I disorder were pooled for this analysis and the previously identified factors were examined for their value in predicting treatment outcome. Treatment efficacy was assessed for aripiprazole (n = 1,001), haloperidol (n = 324), lithium (n = 155), and placebo (n = 694) at baseline, days 4, 7, and 10, and then weekly to study end. Mean change in factor scores from baseline to week 3 was assessed by receiver operating characteristics curves for percentage factor change at day 4 and week 1.
Subjects receiving aripiprazole, haloperidol, and lithium significantly improved mania factor scores versus placebo. Factors most predictive of endpoint efficacy for aripiprazole were judgment/impulsivity at day 4 and mania at week 1. Optimal factor score improvement for outcome prediction was approximately 40% to 50%. Early efficacy predicted treatment outcome across all factors; however, response at week 1 was a better predictor than response at day 4.
This analysis confirms clinical benefits in early treatment/assessment for subjects with bipolar mania and suggests that certain symptom factors in mixed or manic episodes may be most predictive of treatment response.
先前对 Young Mania Rating Scale 和 Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale 项目的因子分析确定了抑郁、躁狂、睡眠障碍、判断/冲动和易怒/敌意等复合因子,这些因子是一系列抗精神病药物治疗急性躁狂或混合发作试验中精神病症状的主要成分。然而,这些因子是否能预测治疗结果尚不清楚。
对六项双盲、随机、对照临床试验的数据进行了汇总分析,这些临床试验采用阿立哌唑治疗成人双相 I 型障碍的急性躁狂或混合发作。此前已确定的因子用于预测治疗结果。阿立哌唑(n=1001)、氟哌啶醇(n=324)、锂(n=155)和安慰剂(n=694)在基线、第 4、7 和 10 天以及研究结束时每周进行治疗疗效评估。通过第 4 天和第 1 周的因子变化百分比的接收者操作特征曲线评估因子评分从基线到第 3 周的平均变化。
与安慰剂相比,接受阿立哌唑、氟哌啶醇和锂治疗的受试者躁狂因子评分显著改善。对阿立哌唑终点疗效最具预测性的因子是第 4 天的判断/冲动和第 1 周的躁狂。最佳的因子评分改善用于预测结局约为 40%至 50%。早期疗效预测了所有因子的治疗结果;然而,第 1 周的反应比第 4 天的反应更能预测治疗效果。
本分析证实了双相躁狂患者早期治疗/评估的临床益处,并表明混合或躁狂发作中的某些症状因子可能是治疗反应的最佳预测因子。