Bipolar Disorders Programme, Institute of Clinical Neuroscience, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain.
J Affect Disord. 2013 Jul;149(1-3):56-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
The nature of mixed mood episodes is still a matter of controversy amongst experts. Currently, the approach to this syndrome is mainly categorical and very restrictive. The factor-structure of bipolar mood episodes has not been studied yet. We performed a dimensional analysis of the structure of bipolar episodes aimed at identifying a factor deconstructing mixed episodes; furthermore, we analyzed correlations of factors emerging from the factorial analysis of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) with Temperament Evaluation of Memphis-Pisa-Paris-San Diego (TEMPS-A) and predominant polarity.
187 consecutive bipolar I inpatients hospitalized for DSM-IV-TR acute mood episodes (depressive, manic or mixed) underwent a standardized assessment, including the 24-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS 4.0), the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-21), the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and the TEMPS-A. Principal factor analysis was performed on BPRS-24 items.
This analysis revealed five factors corresponding to "psychosis", "euphoric mania", "mixity", "dysphoria" and "inhibited depression", capturing 71.89% of the rotated variance. The mixity factor was characterized by higher rates of suicidal ideation, more mixed episodes, higher frequencies of antidepressant (AD) use, depressive predominant polarity and anxious temperament.
The factor-structure of the BPRS in inpatients with bipolar I disorder with an acute episode of any type is pentafactorial; one factor identified is the mixity factor, which is independent from other factors and characterized by anxiety and motor hyperactivity and by the absence of motor retardation. Our results should prompt reconsideration of proposals for DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for the mixed features specifier. Limitations of the study include the relative small sample, the absence of drug-naïve patients and the use of rating scales no specific for mixed states.
混合心境发作的性质在专家中仍存在争议。目前,这种综合征的治疗方法主要是分类的,非常具有局限性。双相情感发作的因子结构尚未得到研究。我们对双相情感发作的结构进行了维度分析,旨在确定一个分解混合发作的因子;此外,我们还分析了从Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale(BPRS)因子分析中出现的因子与Temperament Evaluation of Memphis-Pisa-Paris-San Diego(TEMPS-A)和主要极性的相关性。
187 名连续的双相 I 型住院患者因 DSM-IV-TR 急性心境发作(抑郁、躁狂或混合)入院,接受了标准化评估,包括 24 项Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale(BPRS 4.0)、21 项 Hamilton 抑郁评定量表(HDRS-21)、Young Mania Rating Scale(YMRS)和 TEMPS-A。对 BPRS-24 项进行了主成分分析。
该分析显示,五个因子对应于“精神病”、“欣快躁狂”、“混合性”、“抑郁”和“抑制性抑郁”,占旋转方差的 71.89%。混合因子的特点是自杀意念发生率较高、更多的混合发作、抗抑郁药(AD)使用频率较高、抑郁为主极性和焦虑气质。
BPRS 在任何类型的急性发作的双相 I 障碍住院患者中的因子结构为五因子;确定的一个因子是混合因子,它独立于其他因子,其特征是焦虑和运动过度活跃,且不存在运动迟滞。我们的研究结果应该促使人们重新考虑DSM-5 混合特征特定诊断标准的建议。该研究的局限性包括相对较小的样本量、缺乏药物-naive 患者以及使用特定于混合状态的量表。