• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高血压作为胃肠道间质瘤患者接受舒尼替尼治疗疗效的潜在生物标志物。

Hypertension as a potential biomarker of efficacy in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated with sunitinib.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, HELIOS Klinikum Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2012 Dec;23(12):3180-3187. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds179. Epub 2012 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1093/annonc/mds179
PMID:22858558
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reliable biomarkers of sunitinib response in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) are lacking. Hypertension (HTN), an on-target class effect of vascular endothelial growth factor signaling-pathway inhibitors, has been shown to correlate with clinical outcome in advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective analysis examined correlations between sunitinib-associated HTN and antitumor efficacy (N = 319) and safety (N = 1565) across three advanced GIST studies. Blood pressure (BP) was measured on days 1 and 28 of each treatment cycle at a minimum. Time-to-event endpoints were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods, and patient subgroups with and without HTN (maximum systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg) were compared using Cox proportional hazards models. Landmark analyses evaluated associations between early HTN and efficacy endpoints. Adverse events (AEs) were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Sunitinib-associated HTN correlated with improved objective response rates, time to tumor progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Almost all benefits remained significant in multivariate and landmark analyses. Overall incidences of HTN-related AEs were low and similar between groups; incidences of cardiovascular AEs were somewhat higher in patients with HTN.

CONCLUSION

Sunitinib-associated HTN appeared to correlate with improved clinical outcomes in GIST, while incidences of HTN-associated AEs were generally low and manageable.

摘要

背景

胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)缺乏可靠的舒尼替尼反应生物标志物。血管内皮生长因子信号通路抑制剂的一种靶标类效应——高血压(HTN),在接受舒尼替尼治疗的晚期肾细胞癌患者中,其与临床结局相关。

患者和方法

这项回顾性分析检查了三项晚期 GIST 研究中舒尼替尼相关 HTN 与抗肿瘤疗效(N = 319)和安全性(N = 1565)之间的相关性。在每个治疗周期的第 1 天和第 28 天,至少测量血压(BP)。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法估计时间事件终点,并用 Cox 比例风险模型比较有和无 HTN(最大收缩压≥140mmHg 和/或舒张压≥90mmHg)的患者亚组。里程碑分析评估了早期 HTN 与疗效终点之间的关系。比较了两组之间的不良事件(AE)。

结果

舒尼替尼相关 HTN 与客观缓解率、肿瘤进展时间、无进展生存期和总生存期的改善相关。在多变量和里程碑分析中,几乎所有获益均保持显著。HTN 相关 AE 的总发生率低且两组之间相似;高血压患者的心血管 AE 发生率略高。

结论

舒尼替尼相关 HTN 似乎与 GIST 的临床结局改善相关,而 HTN 相关 AE 的发生率通常较低且易于管理。

相似文献

1
Hypertension as a potential biomarker of efficacy in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated with sunitinib.高血压作为胃肠道间质瘤患者接受舒尼替尼治疗疗效的潜在生物标志物。
Ann Oncol. 2012 Dec;23(12):3180-3187. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds179. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
2
Hypertension as a biomarker of efficacy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib.高血压作为舒尼替尼治疗转移性肾细胞癌患者疗效的生物标志物。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 May 4;103(9):763-73. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr128. Epub 2011 Apr 28.
3
The outcome and predictive factors of sunitinib therapy in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) after imatinib failure - one institution study.舒尼替尼治疗伊马替尼治疗失败的晚期胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)的结果和预测因素-单机构研究。
BMC Cancer. 2012 Mar 22;12:107. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-107.
4
Imatinib escalation or sunitinib treatment after first-line imatinib in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients.转移性胃肠间质瘤患者一线伊马替尼治疗后伊马替尼升级或舒尼替尼治疗。
Anticancer Res. 2014 Sep;34(9):5029-36.
5
Phase III study of nilotinib versus best supportive care with or without a TKI in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors resistant to or intolerant of imatinib and sunitinib.尼洛替尼对比最佳支持治疗联合或不联合 TKI 治疗对伊马替尼和舒尼替尼耐药或不耐受的胃肠间质瘤患者的 III 期研究。
Ann Oncol. 2012 Jul;23(7):1680-7. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr598. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
6
Sunitinib as a second-line therapy for advanced GISTs after failure of imatinib: relationship between efficacy and tumor genotype in Korean patients.舒尼替尼作为伊马替尼治疗失败后的晚期 GISTs 的二线治疗:韩国患者疗效与肿瘤基因型的关系。
Invest New Drugs. 2012 Apr;30(2):819-27. doi: 10.1007/s10637-010-9593-1. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
7
Efficacy and safety of regorafenib for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours after failure of imatinib and sunitinib (GRID): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.regorafenib 治疗伊马替尼和舒尼替尼治疗失败的晚期胃肠道间质瘤的疗效和安全性(GRID):一项国际、多中心、随机、安慰剂对照、3 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2013 Jan 26;381(9863):295-302. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61857-1. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
8
Clinical efficacy of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a meta-analysis of recent clinical trials.第二代酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗伊马替尼耐药胃肠道间质瘤的临床疗效:近期临床试验的荟萃分析
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2014 Oct 30;8:2061-7. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S63840. eCollection 2014.
9
Masitinib in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) after failure of imatinib: a randomized controlled open-label trial.伊马替尼治疗失败后,马斯itinib用于晚期胃肠道间质瘤(GIST):一项随机对照开放标签试验。
Ann Oncol. 2014 Sep;25(9):1762-1769. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu237. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
10
Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after failure of imatinib: a randomised controlled trial.舒尼替尼在伊马替尼治疗失败的晚期胃肠道间质瘤患者中的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验
Lancet. 2006 Oct 14;368(9544):1329-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69446-4.

引用本文的文献

1
M4205 (IDRX-42) Is a Highly Selective and Potent Inhibitor of Relevant Oncogenic Driver and Resistance Variants of KIT in Cancer.M4205(IDRX-42)是一种对癌症中KIT相关致癌驱动因子和耐药变体具有高度选择性和强效的抑制剂。
Mol Cancer Ther. 2025 Jul 2;24(7):1040-1053. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-24-0699.
2
A real-world pharmacovigilance study of FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) events for sunitinib.一项关于舒尼替尼的美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)事件的真实世界药物警戒研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jul 24;15:1407709. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1407709. eCollection 2024.
3
Clinical and metabolomic characterization of Brivanib-Induced hypertension in metastatic colorectal cancer.
布里万尼诱导转移性结直肠癌患者高血压的临床和代谢组学特征。
Cancer Med. 2023 Aug;12(15):16019-16031. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6248. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
4
Established and Emerging Cancer Therapies and Cardiovascular System: Focus on Hypertension-Mechanisms and Mitigation.已确立和新兴的癌症疗法与心血管系统:聚焦高血压——机制与缓解。
Hypertension. 2023 Apr;80(4):685-710. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.17947. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
5
Cardiovascular toxicity associated with angiogenesis inhibitors: A comprehensive pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database from 2014 to 2021.与血管生成抑制剂相关的心血管毒性:基于2014年至2021年美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统数据库的全面药物警戒分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 13;9:988013. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.988013. eCollection 2022.
6
Risks and management of hypertension in cancer patients undergoing targeted therapy: a review.接受靶向治疗的癌症患者高血压的风险与管理:综述
Clin Hypertens. 2022 May 15;28(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40885-022-00197-3.
7
VEGF Receptor Inhibitor-Induced Hypertension: Emerging Mechanisms and Clinical Implications.血管内皮生长因子受体抑制剂相关高血压:新出现的机制和临床意义。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2022 Apr;24(4):463-474. doi: 10.1007/s11912-022-01224-0. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
8
A Nomogram Predicting Progression Free Survival in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Receiving Sunitinib: Incorporating Pre-Treatment and Post-Treatment Parameters.一种预测接受舒尼替尼治疗的胃肠道间质瘤患者无进展生存期的列线图:纳入治疗前和治疗后参数
Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 25;13(11):2587. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112587.
9
Hypertension and Prohypertensive Antineoplastic Therapies in Cancer Patients.高血压与癌症患者的升压抗肿瘤治疗。
Circ Res. 2021 Apr 2;128(7):1040-1061. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318051. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
10
The relationship between treatment-induced hypertension and efficacy of anlotinib in recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.治疗引起的高血压与安罗替尼在复发或转移性食管鳞状细胞癌中的疗效之间的关系。
Cancer Biol Med. 2021 Mar 16;18(2):562-8. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0187.