• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

I 类和 II 类树脂复合材料修复体 56 个月的临床性能。

56-month clinical performance of Class I and II resin composite restorations.

机构信息

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Federal University of EspÃ-rito Santo, Vitória, ES, Brazil.

出版信息

J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 May-Jun;20(3):323-8. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572012000300005.

DOI:10.1590/s1678-77572012000300005
PMID:22858698
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3881772/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the 56-month clinical performance of Class I and II resin composite restorations. Filtek P60 was compared with Filtek Z250, which are both indicated for posterior restorations but differ in terms of handling characteristics. The null hypothesis tested was that there is no difference in the clinical performance of the two resin composites in posterior teeth.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-three patients were treated by the same operator, who prepared 48 Class I and 42 Class II cavities, which were restored with Single Bond/Filtek Z250 or Single Bond/Filtek P60 restorative systems. Restorations were evaluated by two independent examiners at baseline and after 56 months, using the modified USPHS criteria. Data were analyzed statistically using Chi-square and Fisher's Exact tests (a=0.05).

RESULTS

After 56 months, 25 patients (31 Class I and 36 Class II) were analyzed. A 3% failure rate occurred due to secondary caries and excessive loss of anatomic form for P60. For both restorative systems, there were no significant differences in secondary caries and postoperative sensitivity. However, significant changes were observed with respect to anatomic form, marginal discoloration, and marginal adaptation. Significant decreases in surface texture were observed exclusively for the Z250 restorations.

CONCLUSIONS

Both restorative systems can be used for posterior restorations and can be expected to perform well in the oral environment.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了 I 类和 II 类树脂复合材料修复体在 56 个月的临床性能。Filtek P60 与 Filtek Z250 进行了比较,两者均适用于后牙修复,但在操作特性方面有所不同。测试的零假设是,两种在后牙中使用的树脂复合材料的临床性能没有差异。

材料和方法

同一位操作者治疗了 33 名患者,共制备了 48 个 I 类和 42 个 II 类窝洞,并用单键/Filtek Z250 或单键/Filtek P60 修复系统进行修复。在基线和 56 个月后,由两名独立的检查者使用改良的 USPHS 标准进行评估。使用卡方和 Fisher 精确检验(α=0.05)进行统计数据分析。

结果

56 个月后,对 25 名患者(31 个 I 类和 36 个 II 类)进行了分析。由于继发龋和 P60 解剖形态过度丧失,导致 3%的修复体失败。对于两种修复系统,继发龋和术后敏感均无显著差异。然而,在解剖形态、边缘变色和边缘适应性方面观察到了显著的变化。仅在 Z250 修复体中观察到表面质地显著下降。

结论

两种修复系统均可用于后牙修复,预计在口腔环境中能表现良好。

相似文献

1
56-month clinical performance of Class I and II resin composite restorations.I 类和 II 类树脂复合材料修复体 56 个月的临床性能。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 May-Jun;20(3):323-8. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572012000300005.
2
Three-year clinical evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations.I类洞修复中不同修复树脂的三年临床评估
Oper Dent. 2014 May-Jun;39(3):248-55. doi: 10.2341/13-221-C.
3
A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results.一项评估一种块状充填型复合树脂、一种传统复合树脂和一种增强型玻璃离子体在 II 类窝洞中的有效性的随机、前瞻性临床研究:一年结果。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2019 Oct 7;27:e20180678. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0678. eCollection 2019.
4
Clinical evaluation of resin-based composites in posterior restorations: two-year results.后牙修复体中树脂基复合材料的临床评价:两年的结果。
Oper Dent. 2010 Jul-Aug;35(4):397-404. doi: 10.2341/09-345-C.
5
One year clinical evaluation of two different types of composite resins in posterior teeth.两种不同类型复合树脂用于后牙的一年临床评估
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 May 1;9(4):26-33.
6
Thirty-Six-Month Clinical Comparison of Bulk Fill and Nanofill Composite Restorations.大块充填与纳米充填复合树脂修复体的36个月临床比较。
Oper Dent. 2017 Sep/Oct;42(5):478-485. doi: 10.2341/16-220-C. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
7
Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage resin composite in endodontically treated premolars: 3-year follow-up.临床评估一种低收缩树脂复合材料在根管治疗前磨牙中的应用:3 年随访。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 May;23(5):2323-2330. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2677-6. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
8
Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.直接树脂复合材料修复体与间接复合嵌体:一年的结果。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2010 May 1;11(3):025-32.
9
Noncarious class V lesions restored with a polyacid modified resin composite and a nanocomposite: a two-year clinical trial.使用聚酸改性树脂复合材料和纳米复合材料修复的非龋性V类洞:一项两年的临床试验。
J Adhes Dent. 2008 Oct;10(5):399-405.
10
Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations.可填充复合树脂修复体的六年临床评估
Oper Dent. 2009 Jan-Feb;34(1):11-7. doi: 10.2341/08-48.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiparametric performance comparison of dental composites for clear aligner attachments.用于隐形矫治器附件的牙科复合材料的多参数性能比较
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 19;25(1):1206. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06623-w.
2
Do bioactive materials show greater retention rates in restoring permanent teeth than non-bioactive materials? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.生物活性材料在永久性牙齿修复中的保留率是否高于非生物活性材料?一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Dec 28;28(1):44. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05414-3.
3
Toward a Clinically Reliable Class II Resin Composite Restoration: A Cross-Sectional Study into the Current Clinical Practice among Dentists in Saudi Arabia.迈向临床可靠的 II 类树脂复合材料修复:沙特阿拉伯牙医当前临床实践的横断面研究。
Int J Dent. 2022 Aug 2;2022:2691376. doi: 10.1155/2022/2691376. eCollection 2022.
4
Compliance of randomized controlled trials in posterior restorations with the CONSORT statement: a systematic review of methodology.后牙修复随机对照试验对CONSORT声明的依从性:方法学的系统评价
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):41-64. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04198-8. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
5
One Year Clinical Evaluation of a Low Shrinkage Composite Compared with a Packable Composite Resin: A Randomized Clinical Trial.低收缩复合树脂与可压实复合树脂的一年临床评估:一项随机临床试验
J Dent (Tehran). 2017 Mar;14(2):84-91.
6
Effect of Pre-heating on Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Dentin.预热对复合树脂与牙本质微拉伸粘结强度的影响。
J Dent (Tehran). 2014 Sep;11(5):569-75. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
7
Six-month evaluation of a resin/dentin interface created by methacrylate and silorane-based materials.甲丙烯酸酯基和硅烷醇基材料构建的树脂/牙本质界面的 6 个月评估。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2013 Jan-Feb;21(1):80-4. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757201302329.

本文引用的文献

1
Survival rate of sealed, refurbished and repaired defective restorations: 4-year follow-up.密封、翻新和修复有缺陷修复体的存活率:4年随访
Braz Dent J. 2011;22(2):134-9. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402011000200008.
2
Effect of chemical degradation followed by toothbrushing on the surface roughness of restorative composites.化学降解后再经牙刷刷洗对修复复合材料表面粗糙度的影响。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2010 Dec;18(6):585-90. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572010000600009.
3
Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial.一项随机临床试验中银汞合金与复合树脂后牙修复体的存留率及失败原因
J Am Dent Assoc. 2007 Jun;138(6):775-83. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0265.
4
Reprinting the classic article on USPHS evaluation methods for measuring the clinical research performance of restorative materials.重印关于美国公共卫生署(USPHS)评估修复材料临床研究性能方法的经典文章。
Clin Oral Investig. 2005 Dec;9(4):209-14. doi: 10.1007/s00784-005-0017-0.
5
Wear resistance of packable resin composites after simulated toothbrushing test.模拟刷牙试验后可填充树脂复合材料的耐磨性
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004;16(5):303-14; discussion 314-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00058.x.
6
Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall.四种V类修复材料的临床评估:3年随访
Am J Dent. 2004 Jun;17(3):147-50.
7
Effect of the number of thermocycles on microleakage of resin composite restorations.
Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2003 Oct-Dec;17(4):337-41. doi: 10.1590/s1517-74912003000400008. Epub 2004 Apr 19.
8
Comparison of wear and clinical performance between amalgam, composite and open sandwich restorations: 2-year results.银汞合金、复合树脂和开放三明治修复体的磨损及临床性能比较:2年结果
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2004 Mar;12(1):15-20.
9
Effect of posterior resin composite placement technique on the resin-dentin interface formed in vivo.后牙树脂复合材料充填技术对体内形成的树脂-牙本质界面的影响。
Quintessence Int. 2004 Feb;35(2):156-61.
10
Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin-based composites for posterior restorations in permanent teeth: results at 12 months.可压实型和传统混合型树脂基复合材料用于恒牙后牙修复的临床评价:12个月的结果
J Am Dent Assoc. 2003 Dec;134(12):1581-9. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0103.