Institute of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
Cell Transplant. 2013;22(1):175-87. doi: 10.3727/096368912X653183. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been extensively investigated for large bone defect treatment, but its clinical application is harassed by controversial outcome, due to highly variable PRP quality among patients. Alternatively, allogeneic PRP from well-characterized donors cannot only generate more consistent and reliable therapeutic effect but also avoid harvesting large quantities of blood, an additional health burdens to patients. However, the use of allogeneic PRP for bone defect treatment is generally less investigated, especially for its immunogenicity in such application. Here, we meticulously investigated the immunogenicity of allogeneic PRP and evaluated its healing efficacy for critical-sized defect treatment. Allogeneic PRP contained 4.1-fold and 2.7- to 4.9-fold higher amount of platelets and growth factors than whole blood, respectively. The intramuscular injection of allogeneic PRP to rabbits did not trigger severe and chronic immunoresponse, evidenced by little change in muscular tissue microstructure and CD4⁺/CD8⁺ T lymphocyte subpopulation in peripheral blood. The implantation of allogeneic PRP/deproteinized bone matrix (DPB) constructs (PRP+DPB) successfully bridged 1.5-cm segmental radial defects in rabbits, achieving similar healing capacity as autologous MSC/DPB constructs (MSC+DPB), with greater bone formation (1.1-1.5×, p<0.05) and vascularization (1.3-1.6×, p<0.05) than DPB alone, shown by histomorphometric analysis, bone mineral density measurement, and radionuclide bone imaging. Furthermore, the implantation of both allogeneic PRP- and autologous MSC-mediated DPB constructs (PRP + MSC + DPB) resulted in the most robust bone regeneration (1.2-2.1×, p<0.05) and vascularization (1.3-2.0×, p<0.05) than others (PRP+DPB, MSC+DPB, or DPB alone). This study has demonstrated the promising use of allogeneic PRP for bone defect treatment with negligible immunogenicity, great healing efficacy, potentially more consistent quality, and no additional health burden to patients; additionally, the synergetic enhancing effect found between allogeneic PRP and autologous MSCs may shed a light on developing new therapeutic strategies for large bone defect treatment.
自体富血小板血浆(PRP)已被广泛研究用于治疗大骨缺损,但由于患者间 PRP 质量差异较大,其临床应用受到争议。相比之下,来自特征明确供体的同种异体 PRP 不仅可以产生更一致和可靠的治疗效果,而且还可以避免采集大量血液,从而减轻患者的额外健康负担。然而,同种异体 PRP 用于骨缺损治疗的应用研究一般较少,特别是其在这种应用中的免疫原性。在这里,我们详细研究了同种异体 PRP 的免疫原性,并评估了其用于治疗临界尺寸缺损的愈合效果。与全血相比,同种异体 PRP 分别含有 4.1 倍和 2.7 至 4.9 倍的血小板和生长因子。将同种异体 PRP 肌肉内注射到兔子中不会引发严重和慢性免疫反应,这从外周血中肌肉组织微观结构和 CD4+/CD8+T 淋巴细胞亚群的变化很少得到证实。同种异体 PRP/脱蛋白骨基质(DPB)构建体(PRP+DPB)的植入成功桥接了兔子 1.5cm 节段性桡骨缺损,与自体 MSC/DPB 构建体(MSC+DPB)具有相似的愈合能力,具有更大的骨形成(1.1-1.5×,p<0.05)和血管化(1.3-1.6×,p<0.05),与单独的 DPB 相比,通过组织形态计量分析、骨矿物质密度测量和放射性核素骨成像显示。此外,同种异体 PRP 和自体 MSC 介导的 DPB 构建体(PRP+MSC+DPB)的植入导致最强的骨再生(1.2-2.1×,p<0.05)和血管化(1.3-2.0×,p<0.05)比其他(PRP+DPB、MSC+DPB 或 DPB 单独)。这项研究表明,同种异体 PRP 具有良好的用于骨缺损治疗的应用前景,其免疫原性低、愈合效果好、潜在质量更一致、且不会给患者带来额外的健康负担;此外,同种异体 PRP 与自体 MSC 之间发现的协同增强作用可能为开发用于大骨缺损治疗的新治疗策略提供启示。