Wray Jane, Aspland Jo, Taghzouit Jayne, Pace Kerry
FHSC, The University of Hull, HU6 7RX, United Kingdom.
Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Jun;33(6):602-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.07.009. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
Wray et al. (2012) found that providing specialist 'add on' study skills sessions to students with SpLD increased the likelihood of progression and earlier identification. However, 48% of students identified as 'at risk' of having a SpLD did not pursue further assessment/support, which is of concern. OBJECTIVES/DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS/SETTINGS: The study aimed to explore the impact of embedding nine study skills sessions designed for students with SpLD into the mainstream curriculum on pre-registration nursing students in one HEI in the north of England. Two cohorts (September 2009 (n=257) and February 2010 (n=127)) took part; a total of 300 students completed a student feedback questionnaire (201 from September 2009, 99 from February 2010 (response rates of 87% and 80%)). The study used an outcome evaluation approach (Watson et al., 2008) to explore the impact of the sessions using a range of measures: (i) a student feedback questionnaire, (ii) length of time from registration to first contact with Disability Services, and (iii) progression data.
Overall, the sessions were received very positively, especially those on essay writing, reflection and learning techniques. Students in the study cohorts made contact with Disability Services 4-6 weeks earlier than other cohorts; referrals were also higher. Equally, students with SpLD with access to study skills had higher rates of progression (e.g. 87% in 2009) than in years with no sessions (e.g. 62% in 2008); progression rates were comparable to their non-disabled peers.
Mainstreaming what had previously been a reasonable adjustment made time- and resource-savings for the institution. Such approaches to embedding are important in encouraging and retaining talented and able students.
雷等人(2012年)发现,为有特殊学习困难(SpLD)的学生提供专门的“附加”学习技能课程,增加了他们继续学习和更早被识别的可能性。然而,被认定有SpLD“风险”的学生中有48%没有寻求进一步评估/支持,这令人担忧。
目标/设计/参与者/地点:该研究旨在探讨将为有SpLD的学生设计的九节学习技能课程纳入主流课程对英格兰北部一所高等教育机构的预注册护理专业学生的影响。两个队列(2009年9月(n = 257)和2010年2月(n = 127))参与其中;共有300名学生完成了学生反馈问卷(201名来自2009年9月,99名来自2010年2月(回复率分别为87%和80%))。该研究采用结果评估方法(沃森等人,2008年),通过一系列措施探讨这些课程的影响:(i)学生反馈问卷,(ii)从注册到首次联系残疾服务部门的时间长度,以及(iii)升学数据。
总体而言,这些课程得到了非常积极的反馈,尤其是关于论文写作、反思和学习技巧的课程。参与研究队列的学生比其他队列的学生提前4 - 6周与残疾服务部门取得联系;转介率也更高。同样,能够获得学习技能的有SpLD的学生的升学比例(如2009年为87%)高于没有开设课程的年份(如2008年为62%);升学比例与非残疾同龄人相当。
将以前作为合理调整的内容纳入主流课程,为该机构节省了时间和资源。这种融入方式对于鼓励和留住有才华和能力的学生很重要。