• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于美国多学科疼痛管理项目的工人赔偿患者的治疗结果。

Treatment outcomes for workers compensation patients in a U.S.-based interdisciplinary pain management program.

机构信息

Center for Pain Management, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago 60611, USA.

出版信息

Pain Pract. 2013 Apr;13(4):282-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2012.00586.x. Epub 2012 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1111/j.1533-2500.2012.00586.x
PMID:22863287
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Assess the efficacy of an outpatient-based interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program for patients with active workers compensation claims.

PATIENTS

Data were available for 101 patients, primarily with chronic low back pain (75%), who participated in the program.

METHODS

Treatment included a 4-week (Monday to Friday), 8-hours/day graded progressive program that included individual and group therapies (pain psychology, physical therapy, occupational therapy, relaxation training/biofeedback, aerobic conditioning, pool therapy, vocational counseling, patient education and medical management). Outcome measures included program completion status, release-to-work status, return-to-work status, total scores on the Beck depression inventory, state-trait anxiety inventory, pain catastrophizing scale, and the McGill pain questionnaire visual analogue scale (MPQ VAS). The majority of the patients (65%) graduated from the program. Pre-postoutcome data were available for those who graduated from the program. For noncompleters, last obtained MPQ VAS was compared with their initial MPQ VAS scores.

RESULTS

Of those completing the program, most patients (91%)were released to return to work; with 80% released to full-time status and 11% released to gradual return. Approximately half (49%) of the program completers returned to work. Paired-samples t-tests showed that program completers had significant reductions in depression (P = 0.000), pain-related catastrophizing (P = 0.033), and pain intensity (P = 0.000), but not in anxiety (P = 0.098). Interestingly, the last obtained (at early discharge/withdrawal) pain intensity scores (M = 70.33) were higher than at baseline (M = 61.20) in the noncompleters. This difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.127) but may be clinically meaningful.

DISCUSSION

Our results support the efficacy of an outpatient-based 4-week interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program in decreasing emotional distress, reducing pain intensity, and improving return-to-work status in the majority of completers in this challenging population. Patients reporting increased pain at discharge or those discharged early may have been due to operant factors.

摘要

目的

评估基于门诊的多学科疼痛康复计划对有活跃工人赔偿要求的患者的疗效。

患者

数据可用于 101 名患者,主要患有慢性下腰痛(75%),他们参加了该计划。

方法

治疗包括为期 4 周(星期一至星期五),每天 8 小时的分级渐进式计划,包括个体和小组治疗(疼痛心理学、物理治疗、职业治疗、放松训练/生物反馈、有氧运动、游泳池治疗、职业咨询、患者教育和医疗管理)。结果测量包括计划完成状态、工作释放状态、工作返回状态、贝克抑郁量表、状态特质焦虑量表、疼痛灾难化量表和麦吉尔疼痛问卷视觉模拟量表(MPQ VAS)的总评分。大多数患者(65%)从该计划毕业。对于从该计划毕业的患者,提供了预后结果数据。对于未完成者,将最后获得的 MPQ VAS 与他们的初始 MPQ VAS 评分进行比较。

结果

在完成该计划的患者中,大多数(91%)患者被释放以返回工作;80%被释放为全职,11%被释放为逐步返回。大约一半(49%)的计划完成者返回工作。配对样本 t 检验显示,计划完成者的抑郁(P = 0.000)、与疼痛相关的灾难化(P = 0.033)和疼痛强度(P = 0.000)显著降低,但焦虑(P = 0.098)没有。有趣的是,未完成者的最后一次获得的疼痛强度评分(M = 70.33)高于基线(M = 61.20),但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.127),但可能具有临床意义。

讨论

我们的结果支持基于门诊的 4 周多学科疼痛康复计划的疗效,该计划可减少情绪困扰,降低疼痛强度,并改善大多数复杂人群中的康复状态。在出院或提前出院时报告疼痛增加的患者可能是由于操作性因素。

相似文献

1
Treatment outcomes for workers compensation patients in a U.S.-based interdisciplinary pain management program.基于美国多学科疼痛管理项目的工人赔偿患者的治疗结果。
Pain Pract. 2013 Apr;13(4):282-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2012.00586.x. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
2
A comparison of high intensity aerobic exercise and passive modalities for the treatment of workers with chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled trial.高强度有氧运动与被动疗法治疗慢性下腰痛患者的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011 Sep;47(3):359-66. Epub 2011 May 23.
3
Multidisciplinary rehabilitation of chronic work-related upper extremity disorders. Long-term effects.慢性工作相关上肢疾病的多学科康复。长期效果。
J Occup Med. 1993 Apr;35(4):396-403.
4
Physical demand levels in individuals completing a sports performance-based work conditioning/hardening program after lumbar fusion.
Spine J. 2009 Jan-Feb;9(1):39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.07.007. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
5
Predicting factors of successful recovery from lumbar spine surgery among workers' compensation patients.工伤赔偿患者腰椎手术成功康复的预测因素
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2001 Feb;101(2):78-83.
6
Is type of compensation a predictor of outcome after lumbar fusion?腰椎融合术后,赔偿类型是否为预后的预测因素?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Mar 1;38(5):443-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318278ebe8.
7
Intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET): a viable alternative to surgery for low back pain in workers' compensation patients?椎间盘内电热疗法(IDET):工人赔偿患者下背痛手术的可行替代方案?
J La State Med Soc. 2008 Sep-Oct;160(5):280-5.
8
Smoking status and psychosocioeconomic outcomes of functional restoration in patients with chronic spinal disability.慢性脊柱残疾患者功能恢复的吸烟状况及社会心理经济结果
Spine J. 2004 Mar-Apr;4(2):170-5. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.08.030.
9
The influence of intense exercise-based physical therapy program on back pain anticipated before and induced by physical activities.基于高强度运动的物理治疗方案对身体活动之前预期的以及由身体活动诱发的背痛的影响。
Spine J. 2004 Mar-Apr;4(2):176-83. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.08.031.
10
Positive effects of a musculoskeletal pain rehabilitation program regardless of pain duration or diagnosis.肌肉骨骼疼痛康复计划的积极影响,与疼痛持续时间或诊断无关。
PM R. 2012 May;4(5):355-66. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.11.007. Epub 2012 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationships between physical therapy intervention and opioid use: A scoping review.物理治疗干预与阿片类药物使用之间的关系:范围综述。
PM R. 2022 Jul;14(7):837-854. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12654. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
2
Evaluating the Relationship Between Initial Injury, Referral to A Pain Clinic, and Medical Retirement from the Army: A Retrospective Analysis.评估初始损伤、转诊至疼痛诊所与军队医疗退役之间的关系:回顾性分析。
Mil Med. 2021 Jan 25;186(Suppl 1):502-505. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaa463.
3
Interventions on cognitions and perceptions that influence work participation of employees with chronic health problems: a scoping review.
对影响患有慢性健康问题员工工作参与度的认知和感知的干预措施:一项范围综述
BMC Public Health. 2020 Oct 27;20(1):1610. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09621-5.
4
Structural MRI Analysis of Chronic Pain Patients Following Interdisciplinary Treatment Shows Changes in Brain Volume and Opiate-Dependent Reorganization of the Amygdala and Hippocampus.慢性疼痛患者接受多学科治疗后的结构磁共振成像分析显示脑容量变化以及杏仁核和海马体的阿片类药物依赖性重组。
Pain Med. 2020 Nov 1;21(11):2765-2776. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa129.
5
Changes in Clinical Status after Completion of an Interdisciplinary Pain Management Programme Incorporating Pain Neurophysiology Education.纳入疼痛神经生理学教育的多学科疼痛管理计划完成后的临床状态变化
Physiother Can. 2018 Fall;70(4):382-392. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2016-72.ep.
6
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression and Anxiety in an Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Program for Chronic Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial with a 3-Year Follow-up.慢性疼痛跨学科康复项目中针对抑郁和焦虑的认知行为疗法:一项为期3年随访的随机对照试验
Int J Behav Med. 2018 Feb;25(1):55-66. doi: 10.1007/s12529-017-9690-z.
7
Psychological Treatments and Psychotherapies in the Neurorehabilitation of Pain: Evidences and Recommendations from the Italian Consensus Conference on Pain in Neurorehabilitation.疼痛神经康复中的心理治疗与心理疗法:来自意大利神经康复疼痛共识会议的证据与建议
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 19;7:115. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00115. eCollection 2016.
8
Clinical Decision Support Tools for Selecting Interventions for Patients with Disabling Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Scoping Review.用于为患有致残性肌肉骨骼疾病的患者选择干预措施的临床决策支持工具:一项范围综述。
J Occup Rehabil. 2016 Sep;26(3):286-318. doi: 10.1007/s10926-015-9614-1.
9
Mechanism, assessment and management of pain in chronic pancreatitis: Recommendations of a multidisciplinary study group.慢性胰腺炎疼痛的机制、评估与管理:多学科研究小组的建议
Pancreatology. 2016 Jan-Feb;16(1):83-94. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2015.10.015. Epub 2015 Nov 11.