• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜妇科手术中腹腔内注射罗哌卡因或罗哌卡因加哌替啶

Intraperitoneal ropivacaine or ropivacaine plus meperidine for laparoscopic gynecological procedures.

作者信息

Karaman Semra, Kocabaş Seden, Ergun Sedat, Fırat Vicdan, Uyar Meltem, Şendağ Fatih

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Agri. 2012;24(2):56-62. doi: 10.5505/agri.2012.21033.

DOI:10.5505/agri.2012.21033
PMID:22865489
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Postoperative pain after laparoscopic surgery is less intense than after laparotomy and patients may benefit from an intraperitoneal injection of local anesthetic and opioids. We aimed to compare intraperitoneal 0.75% ropivacaine with 0.75% ropivacaine plus meperidine for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy.

METHODS

At the end of gynecologic laparoscopy, in a double-blind, randomized manner, one of the following injections was given intraperitoneally. Patients were allocated into three groups: Patients in R Group (n=18) were given 0.75% ropivacaine 3 mg/kg in 200 mL saline; patients in RM Group (n=17) were given meperidine 50 mg plus 0.75% ropivacaine 3 mg/kg in 200 mL saline; patients in C Group (n=18) were given 200 mL saline through the trocars. All patients were given diclofenac sodium when they had pain (VAS 3) and 1 mg/kg meperidine i.v. was also given when pain persisted.

RESULTS

The pain scores and analgesic requirements during the first postoperative hour were significantly lower in the RM Group than those in the R and C Groups. Beyond that time, the pain scores were similar in all groups and there were no differences in total analgesic requirement in 24 h between groups. The three groups were comparable for shoulder pain and side effects.

CONCLUSION

The intraperitoneal infiltration of 0.75% ropivacaine plus meperidine reduced pain scores and analgesic requirement during the first one hour after gynecologic laparoscopy compared with the intraperitoneal infiltration of ropivacaine or saline.

摘要

目的

腹腔镜手术后的疼痛强度低于开腹手术后的疼痛强度,患者可能会从腹腔内注射局部麻醉药和阿片类药物中获益。我们旨在比较0.75%罗哌卡因腹腔内注射与0.75%罗哌卡因加哌替啶腹腔内注射用于妇科腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛的效果。

方法

在妇科腹腔镜手术结束时,采用双盲随机方式进行以下一种注射。患者被分为三组:R组(n = 18)患者在200 mL生理盐水中给予0.75%罗哌卡因3 mg/kg;RM组(n = 17)患者在200 mL生理盐水中给予哌替啶50 mg加0.75%罗哌卡因3 mg/kg;C组(n = 18)患者通过套管针给予200 mL生理盐水。所有患者疼痛时(视觉模拟评分法[VAS]为3)给予双氯芬酸钠,疼痛持续时还静脉注射1 mg/kg哌替啶。

结果

RM组术后第1小时的疼痛评分和镇痛需求显著低于R组和C组。在此之后,所有组的疼痛评分相似,各组24小时内的总镇痛需求无差异。三组在肩部疼痛和副作用方面具有可比性。

结论

与罗哌卡因或生理盐水腹腔内注射相比,0.75%罗哌卡因加哌替啶腹腔内注入可降低妇科腹腔镜手术后第1小时的疼痛评分和镇痛需求。

相似文献

1
Intraperitoneal ropivacaine or ropivacaine plus meperidine for laparoscopic gynecological procedures.腹腔镜妇科手术中腹腔内注射罗哌卡因或罗哌卡因加哌替啶
Agri. 2012;24(2):56-62. doi: 10.5505/agri.2012.21033.
2
Disposition and clinical outcome after intraperitoneal meperidine and ropivacaine administration during laparoscopic surgery.腹腔镜手术期间腹腔内注射哌替啶和罗哌卡因后的处置及临床结局
Anesth Analg. 2008 Jan;106(1):278-86, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000287650.75027.11.
3
Efficacy of periportal infiltration and intraperitoneal instillation of ropivacaine after laparoscopic surgery in children.罗哌卡因在儿童腹腔镜手术后门静脉周围浸润及腹腔内灌注的疗效
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009 Dec;19(6):821-5. doi: 10.1089/lap.2008.0227.
4
Combination of pre-emptive port-site and intraoperative intraperitoneal ropivacaine for reduction of postoperative pain: a prospective cohort study.术前切口部位和术中腹腔内联合使用罗哌卡因减轻术后疼痛:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Aug;179:11-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 May 13.
5
Intraarticular administration of ketorolac, morphine, and ropivacaine combined with intraarticular patient-controlled regional analgesia for pain relief after shoulder surgery: a randomized, double-blind study.酮咯酸、吗啡和罗哌卡因关节腔内给药联合关节腔内患者自控区域镇痛用于肩部手术后的疼痛缓解:一项随机双盲研究。
Anesth Analg. 2008 Jan;106(1):328-33, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000297297.79822.00.
6
Multi-regional local anesthetic infiltration during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients receiving prophylactic multi-modal analgesia: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study.接受预防性多模式镇痛的患者在腹腔镜胆囊切除术期间进行多区域局部麻醉药浸润:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Anesth Analg. 1999 Oct;89(4):1017-24. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199910000-00036.
7
Pain relief by continuous intraperitoneal nebulization of ropivacaine during gynecologic laparoscopic surgery--a randomized study and review of the literature.妇科腹腔镜手术期间通过罗哌卡因持续腹腔内雾化进行疼痛缓解——一项随机研究及文献综述
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Sep-Oct;15(5):554-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.05.012.
8
Intraperitoneal ropivacaine and a gas drain: effects on postoperative pain in laparoscopic surgery.腹腔内罗哌卡因与气体引流:对腹腔镜手术术后疼痛的影响
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004 Nov;11(4):486-91. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60080-1.
9
Intraperitoneal nebulization of ropivacaine for pain control after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.腹腔内罗哌卡因雾化用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛控制的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2013 May;110(5):800-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes495. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
10
Preventing postoperative pain by local anesthetic instillation after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a placebo-controlled comparison of bupivacaine and ropivacaine.腹腔镜妇科手术后通过局部麻醉药注入预防术后疼痛:布比卡因和罗哌卡因的安慰剂对照比较
Anesth Analg. 2000 Aug;91(2):403-7. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200008000-00032.

引用本文的文献

1
Spinal Anesthesia and Spinal Anesthesia with Subdiaphragmatic Lidocaine in Shoulder Pain Reduction for Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.椎管内麻醉联合膈下利多卡因在妇科腹腔镜手术中减轻肩部疼痛的效果:一项随机临床试验。
Pain Res Manag. 2017;2017:1721460. doi: 10.1155/2017/1721460. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
2
The effect of local/topical analgesics on incisional pain in a pig model.局部/外用镇痛药对猪模型切口疼痛的影响。
J Pain Res. 2017 Sep 4;10:2169-2175. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S144949. eCollection 2017.