Cianchi Giovanni, Bonizzoli Manuela, Zagli Giovanni, di Valvasone Simona, Biondi Simona, Ciapetti Marco, Perretta Lucia, Mariotti Furio, Peris Adriano
Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit of Emergency Department, Careggi Teaching Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50139 Florence, Italy.
J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2012 Aug 6;6(1):8. doi: 10.1186/1752-2897-6-8.
The choice of optimal treatment in traumatic brain injured (TBI) patients is a challenge. The aim of this study was to verify the neurological outcome of severe TBI patients treated with decompressive craniectomy (early < 24 h, late > 24 h), compared to conservative treatment, in hospital and after 6-months.
A total of 186 TBI patients admitted to the ICU of the Emergency Department of a tertiary referral center (Careggi Teaching Hospital, Florence, Italy) from 2005 through 2009 were retrospectively studied. Patients treated with decompressive craniectomy were divided into 2 groups: "early craniectomy group" (patients who underwent to craniectomy within the first 24 hours); and "late craniectomy group" (patients who underwent to craniectomy later than the first 24 hours). As a control group, patients whose intracranial hypertension was successfully controlled by medical treatment were included in the "no craniectomy group".
Groups included 41 patients who required early decompressive craniectomy, 21 patients treated with late craniectomy (7.7 days after trauma, on average), and 124 patients for whom intracranial hypertension was successfully controlled through conservative treatment. Groups were comparable in age and trauma/critical illness scores, except for a significantly higher Marshall score in early craniectomized patients. The Glasgow Outcome Scale was comparable between groups at ICU, at the time of hospital discharge and at 6 months.
In our sample, a late craniectomy in patients with refractory intracranial hypertension produced a comparable 6-months neurological outcome if compared to patients responder to standard treatment. This data must be reproduced and confirmed before considering as goal-treatment in refractory intracranial hypertension.
外伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者最佳治疗方法的选择是一项挑战。本研究的目的是比较与保守治疗相比,接受减压颅骨切除术(早期<24小时,晚期>24小时)的重度TBI患者在住院期间及6个月后的神经学转归。
回顾性研究了2005年至2009年期间入住三级转诊中心(意大利佛罗伦萨卡雷吉教学医院急诊科重症监护病房)的186例TBI患者。接受减压颅骨切除术的患者分为两组:“早期颅骨切除术组”(在最初24小时内接受颅骨切除术的患者);“晚期颅骨切除术组”(在最初24小时后接受颅骨切除术的患者)。作为对照组,颅内高压通过药物治疗成功控制的患者被纳入“非颅骨切除术组”。
研究组包括41例需要早期减压颅骨切除术的患者、21例接受晚期颅骨切除术的患者(平均创伤后7.7天)以及124例通过保守治疗成功控制颅内高压的患者。除早期接受颅骨切除术的患者Marshall评分显著较高外,各组在年龄和创伤/危重病评分方面具有可比性。在重症监护病房、出院时及6个月时,各组之间的格拉斯哥预后量表结果具有可比性。
在我们的样本中,与对标准治疗有反应的患者相比,难治性颅内高压患者进行晚期颅骨切除术在6个月时的神经学转归相当。在将其视为难治性颅内高压的目标治疗方法之前,必须重复并确认该数据。