• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Home visits for frail older people: a qualitative study on the needs and preferences of frail older people and their informal caregivers.居家探访衰弱老年人:一项关于衰弱老年人及其非正式照护者需求和偏好的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Aug;62(601):e554-60. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X653606.
2
Preferences for receiving information among frail older adults and their informal caregivers: a qualitative study.虚弱老年人及其非正式照护者对信息获取的偏好:一项定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2012 Dec;29(6):742-7. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cms033. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
3
Implementation of an innovative web-based conference table for community-dwelling frail older people, their informal caregivers and professionals: a process evaluation.基于网络的创新型会议桌在社区居住的体弱老年人、其非正式照护者和专业人员中的实施:过程评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 15;12:251. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-251.
4
Care for community-dwelling frail older people: a practice nurse perspective.照顾社区居家体弱老年人:执业护士的视角。
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Aug;23(15-16):2313-22. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12513. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
5
End of life care for frail older patients in family practice (ELFOP)--protocol of a longitudinal qualitative study on needs, appropriateness and utilisation of services.家庭医学中体弱老年患者的终末关怀(ELFOP)——一项关于需求、适宜性和服务利用的纵向定性研究方案。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 May 3;14:52. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-52.
6
Which frail older patients use online health communities and why? A mixed methods process evaluation of use of the Health and Welfare portal.哪些体弱的老年患者使用在线健康社区,原因是什么?对健康与福利门户网站使用情况的混合方法过程评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Dec 17;16(12):e278. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3609.
7
Preventive Home Visits Among Frail Community-Dwelling Older Adults. The Added Value of Follow-Up Telephone Calls.社区内虚弱老年人的预防性家访。随访电话的附加价值。
Soc Work Public Health. 2024 Jul 3;39(5):444-457. doi: 10.1080/19371918.2024.2325555. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
8
Relational aspects of mastery for frail, older adults: The role of informal caregivers in the care process.虚弱、老年人掌握技能的关系方面:非正式照护者在照护过程中的作用。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 May;27(3):632-641. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12676. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
9
Needs and preferences of informal caregivers regarding outpatient care for the elderly: a systematic literature review.老年人门诊护理中非正式照护者的需求和偏好:系统文献回顾。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Mar 13;19(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1068-4.
10
Perception of Utility and Efficacy of Implementation of TEC-MED Model of Care for Frail Older People and Their Caregivers: A Qualitative Study.实施 TEC-MED 关爱模式对虚弱老年人及其照护者的效用和效果的认知:一项定性研究。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2024 Nov;19(6):e12658. doi: 10.1111/opn.12658.

引用本文的文献

1
The effectiveness of nurse-led interventions to manage frailty in community-dwelling older people: a systematic review.护士主导的干预措施在管理社区居住老年人虚弱方面的效果:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 30;12(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02335-w.
2
What matters to people aged 80 and over regarding ambulatory care? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.对于80岁及以上的老年人来说,门诊护理方面什么是重要的?一项定性研究的系统评价和元综合分析。
Eur J Ageing. 2021 Aug 21;19(3):325-339. doi: 10.1007/s10433-021-00633-7. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Which features of ambulatory healthcare are preferred by people aged 80 and over? Findings from a systematic review of qualitative studies and appraisal of confidence using GRADE-CERQual.80 岁及以上人群更喜欢哪些门诊医疗服务的特点?一项系统评价定性研究的结果,并使用 GRADE-CERQual 评估信心。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 May 16;22(1):428. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03006-6.
4
Understanding the Daily Experiences and Perceptions of Homebound Older Adults and Their Caregivers: A Qualitative Study.理解居家老年患者及其照护者的日常体验和认知:一项定性研究。
J Appl Gerontol. 2021 Dec;40(12):1722-1732. doi: 10.1177/0733464821990171. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
5
Implementation of an interprofessional collaboration in practice program: a feasibility study using social network analysis.实践项目中跨专业协作的实施:一项使用社会网络分析的可行性研究
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Jan 6;7(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00746-3.
6
Supporting Older People to Live Safely at Home - Findings from Thirteen Case Studies on Integrated Care Across Europe.支持老年人在家安全生活——欧洲综合护理十三项案例研究的结果
Int J Integr Care. 2020 Oct 7;20(4):1. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5423.
7
Home visits for vulnerable older people: journeys to the 'Far End'.对弱势老年人的家访:通往“远端”的旅程。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Oct 1;70(699):479-480. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X712685. Print 2020 Oct.
8
A qualitative study of health-care experiences and challenges faced by ageing homebound adults.一项关于居家老年成年人的医疗保健体验和面临挑战的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2020 Aug;23(4):934-942. doi: 10.1111/hex.13072. Epub 2020 May 31.
9
Comprehensive geriatric assessments in integrated care programs for older people living at home: A scoping review.居家老年人整合照护计划中的综合老年评估:范围综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Sep;27(5):e549-e566. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12793. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
10
New alumni EXperiences of Training and independent Unsupervised Practice (NEXT-UP): protocol for a cross-sectional study of early career general practitioners.新校友培训和独立监督实践体验(NEXT-UP):一项对早期执业全科医生的横断面研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 30;9(5):e029585. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029585.

本文引用的文献

1
[Education within the Dutch National Care for the Elderly Programme].[荷兰国家老年人护理计划中的教育]
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2016 Dec;47(6):272-281. doi: 10.1007/s12439-016-0194-0.
2
Back to black bag and horse-and-buggy medicine.回到黑袋子和马车时代的医学。
CMAJ. 2011 Nov 8;183(16):1829-30. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-3995. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
3
Home visits - central to primary care, tradition or an obligation? A qualitative study.家庭访视——基本医疗保健的核心,是传统还是义务?一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Apr 22;12:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-24.
4
Prevention of adverse health trajectories in a vulnerable elderly population through nurse home visits: a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN05358495].通过护士家访预防脆弱老年人群体的不良健康轨迹:一项随机对照试验 [ISRCTN05358495]。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010 Jul;65(7):734-42. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glq037. Epub 2010 May 9.
5
Review of nurse home visiting interventions for community-dwelling older persons with existing disability.针对社区居住的残疾老年人的护士家访干预措施综述。
Med Care Res Rev. 2009 Apr;66(2):119-46. doi: 10.1177/1077558708328815. Epub 2008 Dec 29.
6
An integrative research review of preventive home visits among older people--is an individual health resource perspective a vision or a reality?老年人预防性家访的综合研究综述——从个人健康资源视角来看,这是一种愿景还是现实?
Scand J Caring Sci. 2009 Sep;23(3):558-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00637.x. Epub 2008 Oct 23.
7
Who receives house calls?谁会接受上门问诊?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Aug;56(8):1581-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01782.x.
8
Effects of intensive home visiting programs for older people with poor health status: a systematic review.针对健康状况不佳的老年人的强化家访计划的效果:一项系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Apr 3;8:74. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-74.
9
Multidimensional preventive home visit programs for community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.针对社区老年人的多维预防性家访计划:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008 Mar;63(3):298-307. doi: 10.1093/gerona/63.3.298.
10
Preventive home visits to older people in Denmark--why, how, by whom, and when?丹麦针对老年人的预防性家访——为何进行、如何开展、由谁进行以及何时进行?
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2007 Aug;40(4):209-16. doi: 10.1007/s00391-007-0470-2.

居家探访衰弱老年人:一项关于衰弱老年人及其非正式照护者需求和偏好的定性研究。

Home visits for frail older people: a qualitative study on the needs and preferences of frail older people and their informal caregivers.

机构信息

Department of geriatric medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Aug;62(601):e554-60. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X653606.

DOI:10.3399/bjgp12X653606
PMID:22867679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3404333/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A number of studies have examined the effects of home visits and showed inconsistent results on physical functioning, institutionalisation, and mortality. Despite continuing interest from professionals in home visits for older people, reports on older people's needs and preferences for such visits are scarce.

AIM

This qualitative study aims to explore the views and needs of community-dwelling frail older people concerning home visits.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A qualitative study including interviews with frail older persons and their informal caregivers living in the area of Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

METHOD

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with frail older people and informal caregivers. A grounded theory approach was used for data-analysis.

RESULTS

Eleven frail older people and 11 informal caregivers were included. Most participants emphasised the importance of home visits for frail older people. They felt that it would give older people the personal attention they used to receive from GPs but miss nowadays. Most stated that this would give them more trust in GPs. Participants stated that trust is one of the most important factors in a good patient-professional relationship. Further, participants preferred home visits to focus on the psychosocial context of the patient. They stated that more knowledge of the psychosocial context and a good patient-professional relationship would enable the professional to provide better and more patient-centred care.

CONCLUSION

Patients' expectations of home visits are quite different from the actual purpose of home visiting programmes; that is, care and wellbeing versus cure and prevention. This difference may partly explain why the effectiveness of home visits remains controversial. Future studies on home visits should involve patients in the development of home visiting programmes.

摘要

背景

许多研究都考察了家访的效果,但对身体机能、住院和死亡率的影响结果并不一致。尽管专业人士对老年人的家访仍有持续兴趣,但关于老年人对这类家访的需求和偏好的报告却很少。

目的

本定性研究旨在探讨社区居住的体弱老年人对家访的看法和需求。

设计和设置

这是一项定性研究,包括对居住在荷兰奈梅亨地区的体弱老年人及其非正式照护者进行访谈。

方法

对体弱老年人及其非正式照护者进行半结构化访谈。采用扎根理论方法进行数据分析。

结果

共纳入 11 名体弱老年人和 11 名非正式照护者。大多数参与者强调家访对体弱老年人的重要性。他们认为,家访可以为老年人提供他们过去从全科医生那里得到但现在却错过的个人关注。大多数人表示,这会让他们对全科医生更有信心。参与者表示,信任是良好医患关系的最重要因素之一。此外,参与者希望家访能关注患者的社会心理背景。他们表示,对社会心理背景有更多了解和良好的医患关系,能使专业人员提供更好、更以患者为中心的护理。

结论

患者对家访的期望与家访计划的实际目的大不相同;即关注患者的身心健康,而非治疗和预防疾病。这种差异可能部分解释了为什么家访的效果仍存在争议。未来的家访研究应让患者参与家访计划的制定。