Papaliodis Dean N, Uhl Richard L, Fuchs Marc D
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY 12206-1043, USA. papalid@ mail.amc.edu
Orthopedics. 2012 Aug 1;35(8):e1260-3. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120725-30.
Various modes of failure of primary and revision total hip arthroplasty have been well documented in the literature over the past 30 years. Concerns over polyethylene wear, osteolysis, and hypersensitivity reactions leading to component loosening and early revision have been evaluated and reported in the literature. Routine follow-up is important to monitor for postoperative issues that might lead to the subsequent need for revision.This article describes a case of a 64-year-old man who initially presented 11 years prior with an intertrochanteric fracture, which failed secondary to varus alignment and femoral head osteonecrosis. The fixation was converted to a total hip replacement using the S-ROM system (DePuy, Warsaw, Indiana). Subsequently, the patient was lost to follow-up after primary total hip arthroplasty and presented with a catastrophic fracture of the metal acetabular cup system. The failure was suggested by clinical presentation and confirmed by imaging studies showing a fractured acetabular shell with femoral head prosthesis resting in the superolateral ileum. The contributing factors that resulted in mechanical failure were polyethylene wear and component fracture. The acetabular component was revised with an in-growth cementless trabecular metal multihole cup (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana) with bone grafting of acetabular defects.Routine assessments help educate patients and allow careful monitoring by physicians while establishing a radiographic timeline for the identification, progression, or lack of postoperative complications.
在过去30年的文献中,已经充分记录了初次和翻修全髋关节置换术的各种失败模式。关于聚乙烯磨损、骨溶解以及导致假体松动和早期翻修的过敏反应等问题,已有文献进行了评估和报道。常规随访对于监测可能导致后续翻修需求的术后问题很重要。本文描述了一例64岁男性患者的病例,该患者11年前最初因转子间骨折就诊,骨折因内翻畸形和股骨头坏死而治疗失败。固定方式转换为使用S-ROM系统(DePuy公司,印第安纳州华沙)进行全髋关节置换。随后,该患者在初次全髋关节置换术后失访,之后出现金属髋臼杯系统的灾难性骨折。根据临床表现提示失败,影像学研究证实骨折,显示髋臼杯壳骨折,股骨头假体位于髂骨上外侧。导致机械性失败的因素是聚乙烯磨损和假体部件骨折。髋臼部件采用生长型非骨水泥小梁金属多孔杯(Zimmer公司,印第安纳州华沙)进行翻修,并对髋臼缺损进行植骨。常规评估有助于对患者进行教育,并使医生能够仔细监测,同时建立影像学时间线以识别、跟踪术后并发症的进展情况或判断是否存在并发症。