Suppr超能文献

丹佛健康中心的案例研究:尽管 EMTALA 禁止“急诊部门的病人推诿”,但仍存在这种情况。

Case studies at Denver Health: 'patient dumping' in the emergency department despite EMTALA, the law that banned it.

机构信息

Health Law and Policy at George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services in Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Aug;31(8):1749-56. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0517.

Abstract

The Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act was enacted in 1986 to prevent hospitals from turning away patients with emergency medical conditions, often because they were uninsured--a practice commonly known as "patient dumping." Twenty-five years later, Denver Health--a large, urban, safety-net hospital--continues to experience instances in which people with emergency conditions, many of whom are uninsured, end up in the safety-net setting after having been denied care or receiving incomplete care elsewhere. We present five case studies and discuss potential limitations in the oversight and enforcement of the 1986 law. We advocate for a more effective system for reporting and acting on potential violations, as well as clearer standards governing compliance with the law.

摘要

《紧急医疗与劳动法》于 1986 年颁布,旨在防止医院因患者没有医疗保险而拒收有紧急医疗状况的病人,这种做法通常被称为“病人甩卖”。二十五年后,丹佛健康医疗系统——一家大型城市的医疗保障机构,仍然面临许多紧急情况的病人,他们中的许多人没有保险,在其他地方被拒绝治疗或治疗不完整后,最终来到了该医疗保障机构。我们提出了五个案例研究,并讨论了对 1986 年法律的监督和执行的潜在限制。我们主张建立一个更有效的报告和处理潜在违规行为的系统,并制定更明确的法律合规标准。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验