Suppr超能文献

单独出现的反应性密螺旋体化学发光免疫分析结果的意义。

Significance of isolated reactive treponemal chemiluminescence immunoassay results.

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases and Albion Street Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia.

出版信息

J Infect Dis. 2013 May 1;207(9):1416-23. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis459. Epub 2012 Aug 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Isolated reactive serum treponemal chemiluminescence immunoassay (CIA) specimens cause clinical uncertainty.

METHODS

Sera were screened by CIA, and reactive samples underwent reflex testing with rapid plasma reagin (RPR), Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA), and fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption (FTA Abs) assays. Samples reactive only on the CIA were deemed "isolated" reactive CIA samples. We undertook detailed review of a subset of subjects with isolated reactive CIA specimens.

RESULTS

Of 28 261 specimens, 1171 (4.1%) were reactive on CIA, of which 133 (11.3%) had isolated CIA reactivity. Most subjects (66 of 82 [80.5%]) with isolated reactive CIA specimens were from high-prevalence populations. We found evidence of CIA, TPPA, and FTA Abs seroreversion. The median chemiluminescent signal-to-cutoff ratio was similar for isolated reactive CIA sera and sera that were reactive on either FTA Abs or TPPA assays (2.19 vs 2.32; P = .15) but lower than for sera reactive on both FTA Abs and TPPA assays (12.37; P < .001) or for sera reactive on RPR assays (25.53; P < .001). A total of 11 of 20 patients (55%) with an isolated reactive CIA specimen who underwent medical record review had previous or subsequent evidence of syphilis infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated reactive CIA specimens may represent true T. pallidum infection and may be found after seroreversion of traditional treponemal assays.

摘要

背景

单独的血清反应性密螺旋体化学发光免疫分析(CIA)标本会引起临床不确定性。

方法

采用 CIA 对血清进行筛查,对反应性样本进行快速血浆反应素(RPR)、梅毒螺旋体颗粒凝集(TPPA)和荧光密螺旋体抗体吸收(FTA Abs)检测的反射性测试。仅在 CIA 上呈反应性的样本被视为“单独”反应性 CIA 样本。我们对具有单独反应性 CIA 样本的一部分亚组进行了详细的回顾。

结果

在 28261 个标本中,有 1171 个(4.1%)在 CIA 上呈反应性,其中 133 个(11.3%)有单独的 CIA 反应性。大多数(82 个中的 66 个[80.5%])具有单独反应性 CIA 标本的患者来自高流行人群。我们发现了 CIA、TPPA 和 FTA Abs 血清学逆转的证据。单独反应性 CIA 血清的化学发光信号与临界值之比与在 FTA Abs 或 TPPA 检测中呈反应性的血清相似(2.19 与 2.32;P =.15),但低于在 FTA Abs 和 TPPA 检测中均呈反应性的血清(12.37;P <.001)或在 RPR 检测中呈反应性的血清(25.53;P <.001)。在接受病历回顾的 20 例单独反应性 CIA 标本患者中,共有 11 例(55%)有先前或随后的梅毒感染证据。

结论

单独的反应性 CIA 标本可能代表真正的梅毒螺旋体感染,并且可能在传统密螺旋体检测的血清学逆转后出现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验