• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作记忆负荷既能改善也会损害选择性注意:来自纳冯范式的证据。

Working memory load can both improve and impair selective attention: evidence from the Navon paradigm.

作者信息

Ahmed Lubna, de Fockert Jan W

机构信息

Department of Psychology Goldsmiths, University of London, New Cross, London, SE14 6NW, UK.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Oct;74(7):1397-405. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0357-1.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-012-0357-1
PMID:22872549
Abstract

Selective attention to relevant targets has been shown to depend on the availability of working memory (WM). Under conditions of high WM load, processing of irrelevant distractors is enhanced. Here we showed that this detrimental effect of WM load on selective attention efficiency is reversed when the task requires global- rather than local-level processing. Participants were asked to attend to either the local or the global level of a hierarchical Navon stimulus while keeping either a low or a high load in WM. In line with previous findings, during attention to the local level, distractors at the global level produced more interference under high than under low WM load. By contrast, loading WM had the opposite effect of improving selective attention during attention to the global level. The findings demonstrate that the impact of WM load on selective attention is not invariant, but rather is dependent on the level of the to-be-attended information.

摘要

已有研究表明,对相关目标的选择性注意依赖于工作记忆(WM)的可用性。在高WM负荷条件下,无关干扰项的加工会增强。在此我们发现,当任务需要全局而非局部水平的加工时,WM负荷对选择性注意效率的这种不利影响会发生逆转。要求参与者在保持WM低负荷或高负荷的同时,关注分层纳冯刺激的局部或全局水平。与之前的研究结果一致,在关注局部水平时,高WM负荷下全局水平的干扰项比低WM负荷下产生的干扰更多。相比之下,在关注全局水平时,WM负荷对选择性注意有相反的影响,即提高选择性注意。这些发现表明,WM负荷对选择性注意的影响并非一成不变,而是取决于待关注信息的水平。

相似文献

1
Working memory load can both improve and impair selective attention: evidence from the Navon paradigm.工作记忆负荷既能改善也会损害选择性注意:来自纳冯范式的证据。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Oct;74(7):1397-405. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0357-1.
2
Working memory, perceptual priming, and the perception of hierarchical forms: opposite effects of priming and working memory without memory refreshing.工作记忆、知觉启动与层次形式的感知:无记忆刷新时启动与工作记忆的相反效应
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Aug;72(6):1533-55. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.6.1533.
3
Executive working memory load does not compromise perceptual processing during visual search: evidence from additive factors analysis.执行工作记忆负荷不会在视觉搜索过程中损害知觉加工:来自相加因素分析法的证据。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Feb;72(2):308-16. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.2.308.
4
Attentional distractor interference may be diminished by concurrent working memory load in normal participants and traumatic brain injury patients.注意分散干扰在正常参与者和创伤性脑损伤患者中可能会因同时进行的工作记忆负荷而减轻。
Brain Cogn. 2010 Dec;74(3):298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.08.009. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
5
The spatial focus of attention is controlled at perceptual and cognitive levels.注意的空间焦点在知觉和认知水平上受到控制。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Oct;36(5):1080-107. doi: 10.1037/a0020367.
6
Selective attention and perceptual load in autism spectrum disorder.自闭症谱系障碍中的选择性注意和知觉负载。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Nov;20(11):1388-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02454.x. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
7
Dissociating effects of stimulus identity and load on working memory attentional guidance: lengthening encoding time eliminates the effect of load but not identity.刺激特性与负荷对工作记忆注意引导的分离效应:延长编码时间可消除负荷效应,但不能消除刺激特性效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(8):1475-83. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.694895. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
8
No negative priming without cognitive control.无认知控制则无负启动。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec;36(6):1333-41. doi: 10.1037/a0020404.
9
Auditory working memory load impairs visual ventral stream processing: toward a unified model of attentional load.听觉工作记忆负荷会损害视觉腹侧流加工:迈向注意负荷的统一模型。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Mar;22(3):437-46. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21204.
10
Task-based working memory guidance of visual attention.基于任务的工作记忆对视觉注意力的引导
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 May;73(4):1082-95. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0087-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Pupil size tracks attentional breadth in the Navon task.在纳冯任务中,瞳孔大小与注意力广度相关。
Perception. 2025 Oct;54(10):753-767. doi: 10.1177/03010066251345778. Epub 2025 Jun 17.
2
Openness to experience predicts eye movement behavior during scene viewing.开放性经验预测了场景观看过程中的眼球运动行为。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Oct;86(7):2386-2411. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02937-z. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
3
An updating-based working memory load alters the dynamics of eye movements but not their spatial extent during free viewing of natural scenes.
基于更新的工作记忆负荷会改变自然场景自由观看期间眼球运动的动力学,但不会改变其空间范围。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Feb;86(2):503-524. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02741-1. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
4
Analytic and holistic cognitive style as a set of independent manifests: Evidence from a validation study of six measurement instruments.分析型和整体型认知风格作为一组独立的表现:来自六个测量工具的验证研究的证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 13;18(6):e0287057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287057. eCollection 2023.
5
Reward Expectation Differentially Modulates Global and Local Spatial Working Memory Accuracy.奖励预期对全局和局部空间工作记忆准确性的调节存在差异。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 15;12:744400. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.744400. eCollection 2021.
6
Working Memory Load Enhances the Attentional Capture of Low Reward History.工作记忆负荷增强了低奖励历史的注意力捕获。
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 6;10:2722. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02722. eCollection 2019.
7
Influence of time-of-day on joint Navon effect.一天中的时间对联合纳冯效应的影响。
Cogn Process. 2018 Feb;19(1):27-40. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0849-y. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
8
Synchrony effect on joint attention.同步性对共同注意的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Aug;235(8):2449-2462. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4984-6. Epub 2017 May 16.
9
Opposite effects of capacity load and resolution load on distractor processing.容量负荷和分辨率负荷对分心物处理的相反影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Feb;41(1):22-7. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000013. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
10
Letters in the forest: global precedence effect disappears for letters but not for non-letters under reading-like conditions.林中字母:在类似阅读的条件下,全局优先效应在字母上消失,但在非字母上不消失。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 17;5:705. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00705. eCollection 2014.