• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一天中的时间对联合纳冯效应的影响。

Influence of time-of-day on joint Navon effect.

作者信息

Fabbri Marco, Frisoni Matteo, Martoni Monica, Tonetti Lorenzo, Natale Vincenzo

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Viale Ellittico, 31, 81100, Caserta, Italy.

Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Cogn Process. 2018 Feb;19(1):27-40. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0849-y. Epub 2017 Nov 28.

DOI:10.1007/s10339-017-0849-y
PMID:29185170
Abstract

The shared attention theory suggests that people devote greater cognitive resources to those features co-attended simultaneously with others, determining better performance in several types of tasks. When co-actors performed a go/no-go Navon task attending different features of target letters, the performance was impaired, reflecting a joint Navon effect (the representation of a co-actor's attentional focus made it more difficult to select and apply one's own focus of attention), probably due to asynchronous co-attention with a decrease in cognitive resources involved. Researches in chronobiology and chronopsychology demonstrated that not only selective attention (involved in a Navon task), but also cognitive resources have a daily fluctuations, mainly paralleling the circadian rhythm of body temperature (i.e. increasing values from the morning to evening with a subsequent decline in the night). The study was conducted to assess whether the presence of joint attention, as measured by the joint Navon effect, was influenced by the time-of-day. Sixteen pairs of participants sitting next to each other were required to respond to the identity letters in a go/no-go Navon task twice: in the morning (09:00-10:00) and early afternoon (13:00-14:00). The results showed a joint Navon effect in the morning session only, suggesting that joint attention was affected by the time-of-day effect on cognitive resources.

摘要

共同注意理论认为,人们会将更多认知资源投入到与他人同时共同注意的那些特征上,这使得在几种类型的任务中表现更好。当共同行动者在执行一项对目标字母的不同特征进行选择性注意的“是/否”纳冯任务时,表现会受到损害,这反映了一种联合纳冯效应(共同行动者的注意力焦点表征使得选择和应用自己的注意力焦点变得更加困难),这可能是由于共同注意不同步以及所涉及的认知资源减少所致。时间生物学和时间心理学的研究表明,不仅是选择性注意(涉及纳冯任务),认知资源也有每日波动,主要与体温的昼夜节律平行(即从早晨到晚上逐渐升高,随后在夜间下降)。本研究旨在评估由联合纳冯效应衡量的共同注意的存在是否受一天中不同时间的影响。要求十六对相邻而坐的参与者在一项“是/否”纳冯任务中对字母的识别进行两次反应:一次在上午(09:00 - 10:00),一次在下午早些时候(13:00 - 14:00)。结果显示仅在上午时段存在联合纳冯效应,这表明共同注意受一天中不同时间对认知资源的影响。

相似文献

1
Influence of time-of-day on joint Navon effect.一天中的时间对联合纳冯效应的影响。
Cogn Process. 2018 Feb;19(1):27-40. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0849-y. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
2
Synchrony effect on joint attention.同步性对共同注意的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Aug;235(8):2449-2462. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4984-6. Epub 2017 May 16.
3
Effects of a coactor's focus of attention on task performance.协作者注意力焦点对任务表现的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Dec;38(6):1404-15. doi: 10.1037/a0027523. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
4
A co-actor's focus of attention affects stimulus processing and task performance: an ERP study.共同演员的注意力焦点会影响刺激处理和任务表现:一项 ERP 研究。
Soc Neurosci. 2012;7(6):565-77. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2012.682119. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
5
The synchrony effect revisited: chronotype, time of day and cognitive performance in a semantic analogy task.重新审视同步效应:在语义类比任务中,时型、一天中的时间和认知表现。
Chronobiol Int. 2018 Nov;35(12):1647-1662. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2018.1500477. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
6
Warm-up cognitive activity enhances inhibitory function.热身认知活动增强抑制功能。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 29;13(10):e0206605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206605. eCollection 2018.
7
Time-of-day effects on cognition in preadolescents: a trails study.青少年认知的时间效应:一项追踪研究。
Chronobiol Int. 2010 Oct;27(9-10):1870-94. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2010.516047.
8
Chronotype and time-of-day influences on the alerting, orienting, and executive components of attention.昼夜节律类型和一天中的时间对注意力的警觉、定向和执行成分的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Jan;192(2):189-98. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1567-6. Epub 2008 Sep 23.
9
Time course of neurobehavioral alertness during extended wakefulness in morning- and evening-type healthy sleepers.在早晨型和夜间型健康睡眠者的长时间清醒期间神经行为警觉性的时程变化。
Chronobiol Int. 2011 Jul;28(6):520-7. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2011.590623.
10
Impact of sleep inertia on visual selective attention for rare targets and the influence of chronotype.睡眠惯性对罕见目标视觉选择性注意的影响及昼夜节律类型的作用。
J Sleep Res. 2017 Oct;26(5):551-558. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12525. Epub 2017 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Editorial: Theory of mind.社论:心理理论
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 9;15:1370048. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1370048. eCollection 2024.
2
Gender composition of pairs influences joint action effect.配对的性别构成会影响联合行动效果。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 23;14:1122427. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1122427. eCollection 2023.
3
Theory of mind and joint action in Parkinson's disease.心智理论与帕金森病中的共同行动

本文引用的文献

1
Joint Action: Mental Representations, Shared Information and General Mechanisms for Coordinating with Others.联合行动:心理表征、共享信息与与他人协调的一般机制
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 4;7:2039. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02039. eCollection 2016.
2
Economic decision-making in morning/evening-type people as a function of time of day.作为一天中时间函数的晨型/夜型人的经济决策。
Chronobiol Int. 2017;34(2):139-147. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2016.1246455. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
3
The two-process model of sleep regulation: a reappraisal.睡眠调节的双过程模型:重新评估
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Dec;18(6):1320-1337. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0642-0.
J Sleep Res. 2016 Apr;25(2):131-43. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12371. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
4
Shared Attention.共同关注
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Sep;10(5):579-90. doi: 10.1177/1745691615589104.
5
Time-of-day variation of visuo-spatial attention.视觉空间注意力的昼夜变化。
Br J Psychol. 2016 May;107(2):299-321. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12143. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
6
The joint Simon effect: a review and theoretical integration.联合西蒙效应:综述与理论整合。
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 5;5:974. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00974. eCollection 2014.
7
Prediction in joint action: what, when, and where.联合行动中的预测:是什么、何时以及何地。
Top Cogn Sci. 2009 Apr;1(2):353-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01024.x.
8
Timing is everything: Age differences in the cognitive control network are modulated by time of day.时机至关重要:认知控制网络中的年龄差异受一天中的时间调节。
Psychol Aging. 2014 Sep;29(3):648-657. doi: 10.1037/a0037243. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
9
Attention allocation and task representation during joint action planning.联合行动规划中的注意力分配与任务表征
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Oct;26(10):2275-86. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00634. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
10
Effects of chronotype and time of day on the vigilance decrement during simulated driving.昼夜节律类型和一天中的时间对模拟驾驶期间警觉性下降的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Jun;67:113-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.02.020. Epub 2014 Mar 4.