Department of Health and Human Performance, Middle Tennessee State University, 1500 Greenland Drive, P.O. Box 96, Murfreesboro, TN 37132, USA.
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Mar;16(3):440-52. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012002996. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
The purpose of the present study was to use a meta-analytic approach to examine the convergent validity of the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ).
Systematic review by meta-analysis.
The relevant studies were surveyed from five electronic databases. Primary outcomes of interest were the product-moment correlation coefficients between IPAQ and other instruments. Five separate meta-analyses were performed for each physical activity (PA) category of IPAQ: walking, moderate PA (MPA), total moderate PA (TMPA), vigorous PA (VPA) and total PA (TPA). The corrected mean effect size (ESρ) unaffected by statistical artefacts (i.e., sampling error and reliability) was calculated for each PA category. Selected moderator variables were length of IPAQ (i.e., short and long form), reference period (i.e., last 7 d and usual week), mode of administration (i.e., interviewer and self-reported), language (i.e., English and translated) and instruments (i.e., accelerometer, pedometer and subjective measure).
A total of 152 ESρ across five PA categories were retrieved from twenty-one studies.
The results showed small- to medium-sized ESρ (0.27-0.49). The highest value was observed in VPA while the lowest value was found in MPA. The ESρ were differentiated by some of the moderator variables across PA categories.
The study shows the overall convergent validity of IPAQ within each PA category. Some differences in degree of convergent validity across PA categories and moderator variables imply that different research conditions should be taken into account prior to deciding on use of the appropriate type of IPAQ.
本研究旨在采用荟萃分析方法检验国际体力活动问卷(IPAQ)的聚合效度。
系统综述和荟萃分析。
从五个电子数据库中调查了相关研究。主要结局指标是 IPAQ 与其他工具之间的积差相关系数。对 IPAQ 的每个体力活动(PA)类别进行了五项独立的荟萃分析:步行、中强度 PA(MPA)、总中强度 PA(TMPA)、高强度 PA(VPA)和总 PA(TPA)。计算了每个 PA 类别中不受统计误差(即抽样误差和可靠性)影响的校正平均效应大小(ESρ)。选择了 IPAQ 长度(即短式和长式)、参考期(即过去 7 天和通常一周)、管理方式(即访谈和自我报告)、语言(即英语和翻译)和工具(即加速度计、计步器和主观测量)等调节变量。
从 21 项研究中共检索到 152 个 ESρ 涉及五个 PA 类别。
结果显示,ESρ 为小到中等大小(0.27-0.49)。VPA 的值最高,而 MPA 的值最低。ESρ 在 PA 类别之间因一些调节变量而有所不同。
该研究表明 IPAQ 在每个 PA 类别中的总体聚合效度。PA 类别和调节变量之间的聚合效度程度存在差异,这意味着在决定使用适当类型的 IPAQ 之前,应考虑不同的研究条件。