Accuracy of the Huawei GT2 Smartwatch for Measuring Physical Activity and Sleep Among Adults During Daily Life: Instrument Validation Study.

BACKGROUND

Smartwatches are increasingly popular for physical activity and health promotion. However, ongoing validation studies on commercial smartwatches are still needed to ensure their accuracy in assessing daily activity levels, which is important for both promoting activity-related health behaviors and serving research purposes.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a popular smartwatch, the Huawei Watch GT2, in measuring step count (SC), total daily activity energy expenditure (TDAEE), and total sleep time (TST) during daily activities among Chinese adults, and test whether there are population differences.

METHODS

A total of 102 individuals were recruited and divided into 2 age groups: young adults (YAs) and middle-aged and older (MAAO) adults. Participants' daily activity data were collected for 1 week by wearing the Huawei Watch GT2 on their nondominant wrist and the Actigraph GT3X+ (ActiGraph) on their right hip as the reference measure. The accuracy of the GT2 was examined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (PPMCC), Bland-Altman analysis, mean percentage error, and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE).

RESULTS

The GT2 demonstrated reasonable agreement with the Actigraph, as evidenced by a consistency test ICC of 0.88 (P<.001) and an MAPE of 25.77% for step measurement, an ICC of 0.75 (P<.001) and an MAPE of 33.79% for activity energy expenditure estimation, and an ICC of 0.25 (P<.001) and an MAPE of 23.29% for sleep time assessment. Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the GT2 overestimated SC and underestimated TDAEE and TST. The GT2 was better at measuring SC and TDAEE among YAs than among MAAO adults, and there was no significant difference between these 2 groups in measuring TST (P=.12).

CONCLUSIONS

The Huawei Watch GT2 demonstrates good accuracy in step counting. However, its accuracy in assessing activity energy expenditure and sleep time measurement needs further examination. The GT2 demonstrated higher accuracy in measuring SC and TDAEE in the YA group than in the MAAO group. However, the measurement errors for TST did not differ significantly between the 2 age groups. Therefore, the watch may be suitable for monitoring several key parameters (eg, SC) of daily activity, yet caution is advised for its use in research studies that require high accuracy.