• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Health insurer policies toward risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: a survey of health plan medical directors.

作者信息

Ramsey Scott D, McDermott Cara L, Clarke Lauren, Blough David K

机构信息

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North M3-B232, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.

出版信息

J Insur Med. 2012;43(2):92-101.

PMID:22876413
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine whether health insurance coverage of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening varied based on risk.

BACKGROUND

Population-wide screening guidelines for cancer often incorporate risk information, with modified screening recommendations for those at higher risk due to family history or other factors.

METHODS

In a nationwide Internet- and mail-based survey of health insurance plan medical directors, respondents were asked about their organization's policies towards coverage of CRC screening for persons at average and higher risk of CRC. Additional questions asked about whether the insurer had a definition of increased risk, and coverage of genetic testing for familial CRC syndromes.

RESULTS

Survey invitations were sent to 1158 medical directors; 133 (11%) completed the survey. All plans covered screening for average and high-risk persons. The onset of screening was earlier and intervals were more frequent for higher risk compared to average risk persons, with most respondents stating coverage was determined by "physician discretion." While 75% had a definition of high risk, only 55% covered genetic testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Most insurers offer enhanced coverage of CRC screening, most commonly following the discretion of the physician. Whether this coverage results in earlier, more frequent, or more complete screening of higher risk persons remains uncertain.

摘要

相似文献

1
Health insurer policies toward risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: a survey of health plan medical directors.
J Insur Med. 2012;43(2):92-101.
2
Health plan policies and programs for colorectal cancer screening: a national profile.结直肠癌筛查的健康计划政策与项目:全国概况
Am J Manag Care. 2004 Apr;10(4):273-9.
3
Family history and colorectal cancer screening: a survey of physician knowledge and practice patterns.家族病史与结直肠癌筛查:医生知识与实践模式调查
Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Apr;97(4):1031-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05624.x.
4
The effect of HEDIS measurement of colorectal cancer screening on insurance plans in Pennsylvania.医疗效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)对结直肠癌筛查的测量对宾夕法尼亚州保险计划的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2008 May;14(5):277-82.
5
Does health insurance coverage of office visits influence colorectal cancer testing?门诊就诊的医疗保险覆盖范围会影响结直肠癌检测吗?
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Mar;14(3):744-7. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0477.
6
Adding familial risk assessment to faecal occult blood test can increase the effectiveness of population-based colorectal cancer screening.将家族风险评估添加到粪便潜血试验中可以提高基于人群的结直肠癌筛查的效果。
Eur J Cancer. 2011 Jul;47(10):1571-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.01.022. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
7
Health insurance-related disparities in colorectal cancer screening in Virginia.弗吉尼亚州结直肠癌筛查中与医疗保险相关的差异。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Apr;17(4):834-7. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2760.
8
Is the type of Medicare insurance associated with colorectal cancer screening prevalence and selection of screening strategy?医疗保险类型与结直肠癌筛查普及率及筛查策略的选择有关吗?
Med Care. 2008 Sep;46(9 Suppl 1):S84-90. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817fdf80.
9
Targeting risk groups for screening.针对筛查的目标人群。
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug;24(4):407-16. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.007.
10
Colorectal cancer test use--Maryland, 2002-2006.2002 - 2006年马里兰州的结直肠癌检测使用情况
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007 Sep 14;56(36):932-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Study protocol: the Australian genetics and life insurance moratorium-monitoring the effectiveness and response (A-GLIMMER) project.研究方案:澳大利亚遗传学与寿险暂缓—监测效果与反应(A-GLIMMER)项目。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 May 21;22(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00634-2.
2
Communication and technology in genetic counseling for familial cancer.家族性癌症遗传咨询中的沟通与技术
Clin Genet. 2014 Mar;85(3):213-22. doi: 10.1111/cge.12317. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
3
Evidence-based Guidelines for Precision Risk Stratification-Based Screening (PRSBS) for Colorectal Cancer: Lessons learned from the US Armed Forces: Consensus and Future Directions.
基于循证指南的精准风险分层筛查(PRSBS)在结直肠癌中的应用:美国武装部队的经验教训:共识与未来方向。
J Cancer. 2013;4(3):172-92. doi: 10.7150/jca.5834. Epub 2013 Mar 1.