Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
J Clin Virol. 2012 Nov;55(3):256-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2012.07.013. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
BACKGROUND: Accurate HPV detection and genotyping tests are useful for management of women with HPV infection and for monitoring HPV vaccine efficacy. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of the INNO-LiPA HPV Genotyping Extra assay (SPF10-LiPA) for the detection of carcinogenic HPV types in women referred for opportunistic cervical cancer screening by comparison with the Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) assay. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis from baseline data of HC2 and SPF10-LiPA testing in cervical specimens collected from 1580 consecutive women and correlation with cervical cytology and histology data, when available. RESULTS: The two assays showed a good agreement for detection of carcinogenic HPV types and reported the same prevalence of carcinogenic HPV infections in different age groups. Stratification of study subjects by cervical cytology interpretation and histology results demonstrated that the two tests gave very similar results in the different cytology interpretation groups and in CIN2 and CIN3 samples, while in <CIN2 samples the SPF10-LiPA assay provided a significantly lower number of carcinogenic HPV-positive results than the HC2 test. A comparative analysis of the two assay for individual HPV types showed that HC2 identified as positive between 73% and 100% of specimens with carcinogenic HPV types detected by SPF10-LiPA and, in particular, approximately 90% and 80% of HPV16- and HPV18-positive samples, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A good agreement was observed between HC2 and SPF10-LiPA for carcinogenic HPV type detection, that supports further evaluation of the clinical performance of the new version of SPF10-LiPA in cervical cancer screening protocols.
背景:准确的 HPV 检测和基因分型测试对于管理 HPV 感染的女性和监测 HPV 疫苗的效果非常有用。
目的:通过与 Hybrid Capture 2(HC2)检测相比,评估 INNO-LiPA HPV Genotyping Extra 检测(SPF10-LiPA)在机会性宫颈癌筛查中用于检测致癌 HPV 型的性能。
研究设计:对 1580 例连续女性宫颈标本的 HC2 和 SPF10-LiPA 检测的基线数据进行横断面分析,并与宫颈细胞学和组织学数据相关联(如有)。
结果:两种检测方法在检测致癌 HPV 型方面具有良好的一致性,并报告了不同年龄组致癌 HPV 感染的相同流行率。根据宫颈细胞学解释和组织学结果对研究对象进行分层,两种检测方法在不同的细胞学解释组和 CIN2 和 CIN3 样本中给出了非常相似的结果,而在<CIN2 样本中,SPF10-LiPA 检测提供的致癌 HPV 阳性结果明显少于 HC2 检测。对两种检测方法针对个别 HPV 型的比较分析表明,HC2 检测对 SPF10-LiPA 检测检测到的致癌 HPV 型的阳性标本的识别率在 73%至 100%之间,特别是 HPV16 和 HPV18 阳性标本的阳性率分别约为 90%和 80%。
结论:HC2 和 SPF10-LiPA 对致癌 HPV 型检测的一致性良好,支持进一步评估新版本 SPF10-LiPA 在宫颈癌筛查方案中的临床性能。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012-6-18
J Clin Virol. 2009-7
Nat Rev Urol. 2014-10-21