Psychiatric-Skilled Nursing Home DrieMaasStede, Argos Zorggroep, Schiedam, The Netherlands.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Jan;25(1):34-46. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212001305. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
In this paper, we aim to test the long-term benefit of an integrative reactivation and rehabilitation (IRR) program compared to usual care in terms of improved psychogeriatric patients on multiple psychiatric symptoms (MPS) and of caregivers on burden and competence. Improvement was defined as >30% improvement (≥ a half standard deviation) compared to baseline.
We used the following outcome variables: difference in the number of improved patients on MPS (Neuropsychiatric Inventory, NPI) and improved caregivers on burden (Caregiver Burden, CB) and competence (Caregiver Competence List, CCL). Assessments were taken after intake (T1) and after six months of follow-up (T3). Risk ratios (RR), number needed to treat (NNT), and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated.
IRR had a significant positive effect on NPI-cluster hyperactivity (RR 2.64; 95% CI: 1.26-5.53; NNT 4.07). In the complete cases analysis, IRR showed significant ORs of 2.80 on the number of NPI symptoms and 3.46 on the NPI-sum-severity; up to 76% improved patients. For caregivers, competence was a significant beneficiary in IRR (RR 2.23; 95% CI: 1.07-4.62; NNT 5.07). In the complete cases analysis, the ORs were significantly in favor of IRR on general burden and competence (ORs range: 2.40-4.18), with up to 71% improved caregivers.
IRR showed a significantly higher probability of improvement with a small NNT of four on multiple psychiatric symptoms in psychogeriatric patients. The same applies to the higher probability to improve general burden and competence of the caregiver with an NNT of five. The results were even more pronounced for those who fully completed the IRR program. (Inter)national psychogeriatric nursing home care and ambulant care programs have to incorporate integrative psychotherapeutic interventions.
在本文中,我们旨在测试综合再激活和康复(IRR)计划相对于常规护理的长期益处,在改善精神心理老年患者的多种精神症状(MPS)和照顾者的负担和能力方面。改善的定义为与基线相比,>30%的改善(≥半标准差)。
我们使用以下结局变量:MPS(神经精神问卷,NPI)上改善患者的数量差异和照顾者负担(照顾者负担,CB)和能力(照顾者能力清单,CCL)上改善的照顾者的数量差异。评估在入组时(T1)和六个月随访时(T3)进行。计算风险比(RR)、需要治疗的人数(NNT)和优势比(OR)。
IRR 对 NPI-群集过度活动有显著的积极影响(RR 2.64;95%CI:1.26-5.53;NNT 4.07)。在完整病例分析中,IRR 对 NPI 症状数量的 OR 为 2.80,对 NPI 总和严重程度的 OR 为 3.46;高达 76%的患者得到改善。对于照顾者,能力是 IRR 的显著受益者(RR 2.23;95%CI:1.07-4.62;NNT 5.07)。在完整病例分析中,OR 显著有利于 IRR 对一般负担和能力(OR 范围:2.40-4.18),高达 71%的照顾者得到改善。
IRR 显示出更高的改善概率,对精神心理老年患者的多种精神症状的 NNT 为 4。同样适用于照顾者一般负担和能力改善的更高概率,NNT 为 5。对于那些完全完成 IRR 计划的人,结果更为显著。(国际)精神心理老年护理院护理和门诊护理计划必须纳入综合心理治疗干预。