Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Mar 29;24(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04897-3.
Unpaid carers of older people, and older unpaid carers, experience a range of adverse outcomes. Supporting carers should therefore be a public health priority. Our understanding of what works to support carers could be enhanced if future evaluations prioritise under-researched interventions and outcomes. To support this, we aimed to: map evidence about interventions to support carers, and the outcomes evaluated; and identify key gaps in current evidence.
Evidence gap map review methods were used. Searches were carried out in three bibliographic databases for quantitative evaluations of carer interventions published in OECD high-income countries between 2013 and 2023. Interventions were eligible if they supported older carers (50 + years) of any aged recipient, or any aged carers of older people (50 + years).
205 studies reported across 208 publications were included in the evidence map. The majority evaluated the impact of therapeutic and educational interventions on carer burden and carers' mental health. Some studies reported evidence about physical exercise interventions and befriending and peer support for carers, but these considered a limited range of outcomes. Few studies evaluated interventions that focused on delivering financial information and advice, pain management, and physical skills training for carers. Evaluations rarely considered the impact of interventions on carers' physical health, quality of life, and social and financial wellbeing. Very few studies considered whether interventions delivered equitable outcomes.
Evidence on what works best to support carers is extensive but limited in scope. A disproportionate focus on mental health and burden outcomes neglects other important areas where carers may need support. Given the impact of caring on carers' physical health, financial and social wellbeing, future research could evaluate interventions that aim to support these outcomes. Appraisal of whether interventions deliver equitable outcomes across diverse carer populations is critical.
老年人的无薪照顾者和老年无薪照顾者会经历一系列不良后果。因此,照顾者的支持应该是公共卫生的优先事项。如果未来的评估能够优先考虑研究不足的干预措施和结果,我们对支持照顾者的措施的理解可能会得到加强。为此,我们旨在:绘制支持照顾者的干预措施及其评估结果的证据图;并确定当前证据中的关键空白。
使用证据差距图审查方法。在三个文献数据库中进行了搜索,以寻找 2013 年至 2023 年期间在经合组织高收入国家发表的针对照顾者干预措施的定量评估。如果干预措施支持任何年龄的受照顾者的老年照顾者(50 岁以上)或任何年龄的老年照顾者(50 岁以上),则符合条件。
纳入了证据图谱的 205 项研究共涉及 208 篇出版物。大多数研究评估了治疗和教育干预对照顾者负担和照顾者心理健康的影响。一些研究报告了有关照顾者身体锻炼干预措施以及为照顾者提供友谊和同伴支持的证据,但这些研究仅考虑了有限的结果。很少有研究评估专注于为照顾者提供财务信息和建议、疼痛管理和身体技能培训的干预措施。评估很少考虑干预措施对照顾者身体健康、生活质量以及社会和财务福利的影响。很少有研究考虑干预措施是否产生公平的结果。
关于支持照顾者的最佳措施的证据广泛,但范围有限。过分关注心理健康和负担结果,忽视了照顾者可能需要支持的其他重要领域。鉴于照顾对照顾者身体健康、经济和社会福利的影响,未来的研究可以评估旨在支持这些结果的干预措施。评估干预措施是否在不同的照顾者群体中公平地提供结果至关重要。