Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Circ J. 2012;76(12):2785-91. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-12-0231. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
Patients with biventricular assist device (BiVAD) placement have a poor prognosis, but preoperative risk factors for the necessity of BiVAD have not been fully elucidated.
Data from 79 patients who received left ventricular assist device (LVAD) between November 2002 and December 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Overall, 9 patients (11.4%) required BiVAD, and the survival rate of BiVAD patients was significantly lower than that of LVAD patients (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis for BiVAD requirement showed left ventricular diastolic diameter (LVDd) ≤62 mm (odds ratio [OR], 10.97; P=0.009) to be significantly associated with BiVAD requirement. Preoperative central venous pressure (CVP)/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ratio ≥0.5 (OR, 13.09; P=0.028) was also significantly associated with BiVAD requirement. A new scoring system for predicting BiVAD requirement was created from the combination of CVP/PCWP ratio (≥0.5), body surface area (≤1.4 m(2)), preoperative continuous hemodiafiltration use, B-type natriuretic peptide (≥1,200 pg/ml) and LVDd (≤62 mm), and this had a significantly larger area under the curve (0.909; P=0.003) than right ventricular stroke work index on receiver operating characteristic analysis. A score >20 using the new scoring method indicated significantly high probability of BiVAD requirement (OR, 16.00; P=0.019).
The new scoring method, which includes CVP/PCWP ratio, is a novel risk stratification tool for BiVAD therapy.
接受双心室辅助装置(BiVAD)植入的患者预后较差,但术前需要 BiVAD 的危险因素尚未完全阐明。
回顾性分析了 2002 年 11 月至 2011 年 12 月期间接受左心室辅助装置(LVAD)治疗的 79 例患者的数据。总体而言,9 例(11.4%)患者需要 BiVAD,BiVAD 患者的生存率明显低于 LVAD 患者(P<0.001)。多因素分析显示,左心室舒张末期直径(LVDd)≤62mm(比值比[OR],10.97;P=0.009)与 BiVAD 需求显著相关。术前中心静脉压(CVP)/肺毛细血管楔压(PCWP)比值≥0.5(OR,13.09;P=0.028)也与 BiVAD 需求显著相关。创建了一种新的预测 BiVAD 需求的评分系统,该系统由 CVP/PCWP 比值(≥0.5)、体表面积(≤1.4m2)、术前连续性血液透析滤过使用、B 型利钠肽(≥1200pg/ml)和 LVDd(≤62mm)的组合组成,该评分系统在接受者操作特征分析中的曲线下面积显著大于右心室射血工作指数(0.909;P=0.003)。新评分方法评分>20 分提示 BiVAD 需求的概率显著较高(OR,16.00;P=0.019)。
包括 CVP/PCWP 比值在内的新评分方法是 BiVAD 治疗的一种新型风险分层工具。