• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

核心活检中的非典型导管增生:是否是切除活检的自动触发因素?

Atypical ductal hyperplasia on core biopsy: an automatic trigger for excisional biopsy?

机构信息

Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Oct;19(10):3264-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2575-0. Epub 2012 Aug 10.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-012-2575-0
PMID:22878619
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Excisional biopsy is currently recommended for atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) diagnosed on core needle breast biopsy (CNB), due to risk of upstaging to invasive or in situ carcinoma (DCIS). The study goal was to identify patients who may potentially forego excisional biopsy if the risk of upstaging is low.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with ADH on CNB who underwent excisional biopsy at one institution (5/2000-5/2011). We evaluated the upstaging rate and clinicopathologic factors associated with increased upstaging risk.

RESULTS

A total of 114 cases of ADH were diagnosed on CNB. The median patient age was 64 years. On mammography, a mass/density/area of distortion was present in 23 % of cases; calcifications were present in 77 %. Most biopsies (79 %) were performed stereotactically. Twenty lesions (18 %) were upstaged to infiltrating carcinoma (5 %) or DCIS (13 %). Residual ADH was present in 43 biopsies (38 %). On univariate analysis, significant variables associated with upstaging included age >50 years, a mass lesion on mammography, and shorter length of biopsy core (p < 0.05). No patient ≤50 years of age was upstaged. Three patients who were not upstaged (3 %) developed ipsilateral disease (2 DCIS and 1 infiltrating ductal carcinoma) at a median time of 37 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of upstaging when ADH is diagnosed on CNB at our institution is 18 %, and routine excisional biopsy is currently recommended for all patients. However, patients <50 years old with focal atypia only and no residual calcifications postbiopsy may represent a low-risk group who could potentially avoid excisional biopsy.

摘要

介绍

由于存在升级为浸润性癌或原位癌(DCIS)的风险,目前对于在核心针乳腺活检(CNB)中诊断为非典型导管增生(ADH)的患者,建议进行切除活检。本研究的目的是确定如果升级风险较低,哪些患者可能无需进行切除活检。

方法

我们对在一家机构接受切除活检的在 CNB 中诊断为 ADH 的患者进行了回顾性研究(5/2000-5/2011)。我们评估了升级率和与升级风险增加相关的临床病理因素。

结果

在 CNB 中诊断出 114 例 ADH。患者的中位年龄为 64 岁。在乳房 X 线摄影中,23%的病例存在肿块/密度/区域变形;77%的病例存在钙化。大多数活检(79%)是立体定向进行的。20 个病变(18%)升级为浸润性癌(5%)或 DCIS(13%)。43 个活检(38%)中仍存在 ADH。在单因素分析中,与升级相关的显著变量包括年龄>50 岁、乳房 X 线摄影中有肿块病变和活检芯长度较短(p<0.05)。≤50 岁的患者无一例升级。3 例未升级的患者(3%)在中位时间 37 个月后同侧发生疾病(2 例 DCIS 和 1 例浸润性导管癌)。

结论

在我们机构,CNB 诊断为 ADH 时的升级率为 18%,目前建议所有患者进行常规切除活检。然而,<50 岁、仅存在局灶性不典型性且活检后无残留钙化的患者可能属于低风险组,他们可能可以避免切除活检。

相似文献

1
Atypical ductal hyperplasia on core biopsy: an automatic trigger for excisional biopsy?核心活检中的非典型导管增生:是否是切除活检的自动触发因素?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Oct;19(10):3264-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2575-0. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
2
Lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical lobular hyperplasia at core-needle biopsy: is excisional biopsy necessary?粗针活检发现小叶原位癌或非典型小叶增生:是否需要切除活检?
Radiology. 2004 Jun;231(3):813-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2313030874. Epub 2004 Apr 22.
3
Lobular neoplasia on core-needle biopsy--clinical significance.粗针活检发现的小叶瘤变——临床意义
Cancer. 2004 Jul 15;101(2):242-50. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20318.
4
Is surgical excision necessary for focal atypical ductal hyperplasia found at stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy?在立体定位真空辅助乳腺活检中发现的局灶性非典型导管增生是否需要手术切除?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Nov;15(11):3232-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0100-2. Epub 2008 Aug 12.
5
Lobular neoplasia at 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy: correlation with surgical excisional biopsy and mammographic follow-up.11号真空辅助立体定向活检的小叶瘤变:与手术切除活检及乳腺X线随访的相关性
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Oct;187(4):949-54. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0710.
6
Significance of flat epithelial atypia on mammotome core needle biopsy: Should it be excised?乳腺旋切针芯活检中扁平上皮异型增生的意义:是否应将其切除?
Hum Pathol. 2007 Jan;38(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.08.008. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
7
Factors associated with upgrading to malignancy at surgery of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed on core biopsy.核心穿刺活检诊断为不典型导管增生时,与手术时升级为恶性肿瘤相关的因素。
Breast. 2011 Feb;20(1):50-5. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2010.06.004. Epub 2010 Jul 8.
8
[Breast calcifications with percutaneous vacuum-assisted biopsy diagnosis of malignancy or atypical hyerplasia: correlations with surgical findings].经皮真空辅助活检诊断为恶性或非典型增生的乳腺钙化:与手术结果的相关性
Pathologica. 2002 Dec;94(6):299-305. doi: 10.1007/s102420200053.
9
Upstaging of atypical ductal hyperplasia after vacuum-assisted 11-gauge stereotactic core needle biopsy.真空辅助11号立体定位粗针活检后非典型导管增生的分期上调
Arch Surg. 2003 Jun;138(6):619-22; discussion 622-3. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.6.619.
10
Long-term follow-up of lobular neoplasia (atypical lobular hyperplasia/lobular carcinoma in situ) diagnosed on core needle biopsy.乳腺叶状肿瘤(不典型性小叶增生/小叶原位癌)的核心针活检诊断后的长期随访。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Oct;19(10):3131-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2534-9. Epub 2012 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Diagnosis and Upgrade: A 20-Year Experience and Impact of MRI Use on Upgrade Rates.非典型导管增生的诊断及升级趋势:20年经验以及磁共振成像(MRI)应用对升级率的影响
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May;32(5):3244-3251. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-16933-6. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
2
Atypical ductal hyperplasia on vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a scoring system to predict the risk of upgrade to malignancy.真空辅助乳腺活检中的非典型导管增生:一种预测升级为恶性肿瘤风险的评分系统。
Radiol Med. 2024 Jan;129(1):38-47. doi: 10.1007/s11547-023-01740-4. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
3
Is Surgical Excision of Focal Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Warranted? Experience at a Tertiary Care Center.
是否需要手术切除局灶性非典型导管增生?一家三级保健中心的经验。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jul;30(7):4087-4094. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13319-4. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
4
The effect of delay of excisional biopsy on upstage rate for atypical ductal hyperplasia, flat epithelial atypia, intraductal papilloma, and radial scar.延迟切除术对非典型导管增生、平坦上皮不典型增生、导管内乳头状瘤和放射状瘢痕的升级率的影响。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Dec;196(3):527-534. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06745-7. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
5
Indeterminate (B3) Breast Lesions and the Ongoing Role of Diagnostic Open Biopsy.不确定(B3)型乳腺病变与诊断性开放活检的持续作用
Int J Breast Cancer. 2021 Dec 27;2021:5555458. doi: 10.1155/2021/5555458. eCollection 2021.
6
Detection rate of breast malignancy of needle localization biopsy of breast microcalcification.乳腺微小钙化灶针定位活检的乳腺恶性肿瘤检出率
Tzu Chi Med J. 2021 Mar 22;33(3):275-281. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_191_20. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep.
7
Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia after Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy: Can We Reduce the Upgrade to Breast Cancer to an Acceptable Rate?真空辅助乳腺活检后的非典型导管增生:我们能否将升级为乳腺癌的比例降低到可接受的水平?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jun 19;11(6):1120. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11061120.
8
Diagnostic value of radiomics and machine learning with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for patients with atypical ductal hyperplasia in predicting malignant upgrade.基于动态对比增强磁共振成像的放射组学和机器学习对预测非典型性导管增生患者恶性升级的诊断价值。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jun;187(2):535-545. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-06074-7. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
9
Breast papillary lesions diagnosed and treated using ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excision.使用超声引导下真空辅助切除术诊断和治疗的乳腺乳头状病变
BMC Surg. 2020 Sep 15;20(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00869-7.
10
Positive predictive value for malignancy of uncertain malignant potential (B3) breast lesions diagnosed on vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB): is surgical excision still recommended?在真空辅助活检 (VAB) 诊断为不确定恶性潜能 (B3) 的乳腺病变中,恶性的阳性预测值:是否仍建议手术切除?
Eur Radiol. 2021 Feb;31(2):920-927. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07161-5. Epub 2020 Aug 20.