Kim Keon Yeop, Jeon So Youn, Jeon Man Joong, Lee Kwon Ho, Lee Sok Goo, Kim Dongjin, Kang Eunjeong, Bae Sang Geun, Kim Jinhee
Department of Preventive Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
J Prev Med Public Health. 2012 Jul;45(4):267-75. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2012.45.4.267. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
This study was conducted to assess the potential health impacts and improve the quality of the free immunization program in Jinju City by maximizing the predicted positive health gains and minimizing the negative health risks.
A steering committee was established in September 2010 to carry out the health impact assessment (HIA) and began the screening and scoping stages. In the appraisal stage, analysis of secondary data, a literature review, case studies, geographic information systems analysis, a questionnaire, and expert consultations were used. The results of the data collection and analyses were discussed during a workshop, after which recommendations were finalized in a written report.
Increased access to immunization, comprehensive services provided by physicians, the strengthened role of the public health center in increasing immunization rates and services, and the ripple effect to other neighboring communities were identified as potential positive impacts. On the other hand, the program might be inaccessible to rural regions with no private clinics where there are more at-risk children, vaccine management and quality control at the clinics may be poor, and vaccines may be misused. Recommendations to maximize health gains and minimize risks were separately developed for the public health center and private clinics.
The HIA provided an opportunity for stakeholders to comprehensively overview the potential positive and negative impacts of the program before it was implemented. An HIA is a powerful tool that should be used when developing and implementing diverse health-related policies and programs in the community.
本研究旨在通过最大化预测的积极健康收益和最小化负面健康风险,评估晋州市免费免疫规划对健康的潜在影响,并提高其质量。
2010年9月成立了一个指导委员会来开展健康影响评估(HIA),并开始筛选和界定阶段。在评估阶段,采用了二手数据分析、文献综述、案例研究、地理信息系统分析、问卷调查和专家咨询。在一次研讨会上讨论了数据收集和分析的结果,之后在一份书面报告中确定了建议。
增加免疫接种机会、医生提供的综合服务、公共卫生中心在提高免疫接种率和服务方面的强化作用以及对其他邻近社区的连锁反应被确定为潜在的积极影响。另一方面,没有私人诊所的农村地区可能无法获得该计划,而这些地区有更多高危儿童,诊所的疫苗管理和质量控制可能较差,并且疫苗可能被滥用。针对公共卫生中心和私人诊所分别制定了最大化健康收益和最小化风险的建议。
健康影响评估为利益相关者提供了一个机会,使其在该计划实施之前全面审视其潜在的积极和消极影响。健康影响评估是一种强大的工具,在制定和实施社区中各种与健康相关的政策和计划时应加以使用。