Schor C M, Gleason J, Horner D
University of California, School of Optometry, Berkeley 94720.
Vision Res. 1990;30(11):1827-44. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(90)90162-e.
Hering's law describes the equal and symmetrical rotation of the two eyes. It is possible to calibrate the binocular yoking of the two eyes in response to disparate size and/or motion of the two ocular images. It is unclear if the ratio of movements by the two eyes is modified by selective adaptation of each versional system (i.e. saccades and pursuits) or if there is an apparent adaptation of Hering's law that results from a single underlying process. The latter could be accomplished by vergence (prism) adaptation, which could interact with all versional systems. In this investigation, binocularly stimulated saccades and pursuits were adapted separately for 2 hr to unequal vertical target displacements. Three adaptation paradigms were used; each included a 10% binocular gradient disparity. The adapting stimulus for the pursuit system was 0.25 Hz vertical triangular motion of 20 deg, peak to peak. Two saccade adaptation paradigms included one which emphasized correcting vertical disparity during the pulse component of the saccade, the other minimized the influence of disparity prior to, during and immediately after saccades (vergence paradigm). Yoking ratios (YRs) for vertical pursuits and saccades were compared before and after adaptation. The pursuit paradigm produced marked adaptation of the pursuit YRs while it had negligible effect on saccade YRs. The pulse saccade paradigm adapted the saccade YRs twice as much as the pursuit YRs whereas the vergence paradigm resulted in little adaptation of YRs for either saccades or pursuits. Pursuits adapted to the first paradigm in 15-30 min whereas saccades adapted to the second paradigm in 1.5-2 hr. These results indicate that there is not a single common nonconjugate adaptation mechanism for vertical pursuits and saccades. Results of the vergence paradigm demonstrate that feedback during or immediately after eye movements is necessary in order to stimulate the binocular versional adaptation mechanism. Versional adaptation may be considered as a calibration of Hering's law.
赫林定律描述了双眼的等幅对称转动。根据两眼视像的大小差异和/或运动情况来校准两眼的双眼联动是可行的。目前尚不清楚两眼运动的比例是否会因每个版本系统(即扫视和追踪)的选择性适应而改变,或者是否存在由于单一潜在过程导致的赫林定律的明显适应情况。后者可以通过聚散(棱镜)适应来实现,聚散适应可能会与所有版本系统相互作用。在本研究中,双眼受刺激的扫视和追踪分别针对不等的垂直目标位移进行了2小时的适应。使用了三种适应范式;每种范式都包含10%的双眼梯度视差。追踪系统的适应刺激是峰峰值为20度、频率为0.25赫兹的垂直三角运动。两种扫视适应范式中,一种强调在扫视的脉冲部分校正垂直视差,另一种则在扫视之前、期间和之后尽量减少视差的影响(聚散范式)。比较了适应前后垂直追踪和扫视的联动比率(YRs)。追踪范式对追踪YRs产生了显著的适应,而对扫视YRs的影响可忽略不计。脉冲扫视范式对扫视YRs的适应程度是追踪YRs的两倍,而聚散范式对扫视或追踪的YRs几乎没有适应作用。追踪在15 - 30分钟内适应了第一种范式,而扫视在1.5 - 2小时内适应了第二种范式。这些结果表明,垂直追踪和扫视不存在单一的共同非共轭适应机制。聚散范式的结果表明,眼球运动期间或之后立即进行反馈对于刺激双眼版本适应机制是必要的。版本适应可被视为对赫林定律的校准。