Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Oct;17(4):271-9. doi: 10.3171/2012.7.SPINE111086. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
The object of this study was to compare the mini-open anterior corpectomy procedure with posterior total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) in treating patients with solitary metastases of the thoracolumbar spine.
From 2004 to 2010, 41 patients with solitary metastases of the thoracolumbar spine were treated in our hospital using either a mini-open anterior corpectomy or posterior TES. Intraoperative and diagnostic data, including perioperative complications, were collected using retrospective chart review. The surgical outcomes were assessed according to survival status, neurological function, local recurrence, and pain before and after surgery.
Seventeen patients underwent posterior TES and 24 underwent mini-open anterior corpectomy. Mean blood loss (TES, 1721 ± 293 ml; mini-open corpectomy, 1058 ± 263 ml; p < 0.05), and mean operative time (TES, 403 ± 55 minutes; mini-open corpectomy, 175 ± 38 minutes; p < 0.05) were recorded and calculated. Neurological improvement by at least 1 American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade was noted in 35 (97.2%) of the 36 cases with preoperative deficits. After the operation, 68.4% of nonambulatory patients became ambulatory again, including 84.6% after mini-open corpectomy and 33.3% after posterior TES (p > 0.05). The visual analog scale scores of the patients were significantly reduced after both procedures, with no difference between the procedures (p > 0.05). The local tumor recurrence rate of the TES group was significantly lower than that of the mini-open corpectomy group (p < 0.05), while the postoperative survival rates within 2 years after surgery were similar. The complication rate in the mini-open corpectomy group (29.2%) was higher than that in the TES group (11.8%), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.185). There was no hardware failure and no loss of the sagittal Cobb angle in either group. Slight subsidence (< 3 mm) of the mesh cage was observed with a successful fusion in 3 (17.6%) of 17 patients in the TES group. No subsidence of polymethylmethacrylate block/autograft was recorded in the mini-open group.
Mini-open anterior corpectomy can be accomplished with less blood loss, fewer fixation instrumentations, and shorter surgical time than that required for TES, but patients who undergo a mini-open corpectomy might have a greater tendency to experience local recurrence. A mini-open anterior corpectomy has a relatively mild learning curve and involves fewer technical difficulties. With smaller incisions, mini-open anterior corpectomy is an option in treating solitary metastases of the thoracolumbar spine.
本研究旨在比较微创前路椎体次全切除与后路整块全脊椎切除术(TES)治疗胸腰椎单发性转移瘤的疗效。
2004 年至 2010 年,我院采用微创前路椎体次全切除或后路 TES 治疗 41 例胸腰椎单发性转移瘤患者。采用回顾性病历分析收集术中及诊断资料,包括围手术期并发症。根据生存状况、神经功能、局部复发和术前、术后疼痛评估手术结果。
17 例患者行后路 TES,24 例行微创前路椎体次全切除。记录并计算术中出血量(TES:1721±293ml;微创前路椎体次全切除:1058±263ml;p<0.05)和手术时间(TES:403±55min;微创前路椎体次全切除:175±38min;p<0.05)。术前有神经功能缺损的 36 例患者中,至少有 1 例美国脊柱损伤协会功能障碍评分提高 1 级,神经功能改善率为 97.2%。术后,68.4%的非步行患者再次步行,其中微创前路椎体次全切除后 84.6%,后路 TES 后 33.3%(p>0.05)。两种方法均可显著降低患者的视觉模拟评分,差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。TES 组局部肿瘤复发率明显低于微创前路椎体次全切除组(p<0.05),而术后 2 年内的生存率相似。微创前路椎体次全切除组的并发症发生率(29.2%)高于 TES 组(11.8%),但差异无统计学意义(p=0.185)。两组均未发生内固定失败和矢状 Cobb 角丢失。TES 组 17 例患者中有 3 例(17.6%)出现网笼轻微下沉(<3mm),融合成功。微创前路椎体次全切除组未发现聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯块/自体移植物下沉。
与 TES 相比,微创前路椎体次全切除术可减少出血量、固定器械数量和手术时间,但行微创前路椎体次全切除术的患者局部复发的可能性更大。微创前路椎体次全切除术学习曲线相对较平,技术难度较小。微创前路椎体次全切除术采用小切口,是治疗胸腰椎单发性转移瘤的一种选择。