Suppr超能文献

临床与转化研究及社区参与:对研究人员能力建设的启示。

Clinical and translational research and community engagement: implications for researcher capacity building.

机构信息

Community Health Program, Tufts University School of Arts and Science, Medford, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transl Sci. 2012 Aug;5(4):329-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2012.00433.x. Epub 2012 Jun 28.

Abstract

This research sought to better understand how clinical and translational research is defined and perceived by community service providers. In addition, the research sought to elicit how the perspectives of service providers may hinder or facilitate collaborative research efforts. The study employed a qualitative methodology, focus groups. A nonprobability sampling strategy was used to recruit participants from three neighborhoods in the Tufts University's catchment area. Focus group findings add to the nascent body of literature on how community partners view clinical and translational research and researchers. Findings indicate that cultural disconnects, between researchers and community partners exist, as does mistrust, all of which serve as potential barriers to community research partnerships. This paper suggests rethinking the business of community engagement in researcher, particularly as it relates to building research capacity to approach, engage, and partner with communities.

摘要

本研究旨在更好地理解社区服务提供者如何定义和理解临床和转化研究。此外,该研究还试图了解服务提供者的观点可能如何阻碍或促进合作研究工作。该研究采用了定性方法,即焦点小组。采用非概率抽样策略,从塔夫茨大学服务范围内的三个社区招募参与者。焦点小组的调查结果增加了关于社区合作伙伴如何看待临床和转化研究以及研究人员的新兴文献。研究结果表明,研究人员和社区合作伙伴之间存在文化脱节和不信任,这些都是社区研究伙伴关系的潜在障碍。本文建议重新思考研究人员的社区参与业务,特别是在建立研究能力以接近、参与和与社区合作方面。

相似文献

1
Clinical and translational research and community engagement: implications for researcher capacity building.
Clin Transl Sci. 2012 Aug;5(4):329-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2012.00433.x. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
2
Conceptualising the initiation of researcher and research user partnerships: a meta-narrative review.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Feb 18;18(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0536-9.
3
A Model for Strengthening Collaborative Research Capacity: Illustrations From the Atlanta Clinical Translational Science Institute.
Health Educ Behav. 2014 Jun;41(3):267-74. doi: 10.1177/1090198113511815. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
5
Practical Tips for Establishing Partnerships With Academic Researchers: A Resource Guide for Community-Based Organizations.
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Summer;9(2):203-12. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0042.
6
Community-engaged pedagogy: a strengths-based approach to involving diverse stakeholders in research partnerships.
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Winter;6(4):481-90. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0057.
7
The Development of a Community Engagement Workshop: A Community-Led Approach for Building Researcher Capacity.
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2017;11(3):321-329. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2017.0038.
8
Community capacity building and sustainability: outcomes of community-based participatory research.
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Fall;6(3):349-60. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0048.
10
Community-responsive research priorities: health research infrastructure.
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Fall;6(3):339-48. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0045.

引用本文的文献

1
Community engagement strategies for population health research with culturally diverse adults.
J Med Surg Public Health. 2024 Apr;2. doi: 10.1016/j.glmedi.2023.100037. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
2
Guidelines for Evaluating Clinical Research Training using Competency Assessments.
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Sep 22;8:202. doi: 10.15694/mep.2019.000202.2. eCollection 2019.
6
Researchers' Perspectives Regarding Ethical Issues of Biobank Research in the Arab Region.
Biopreserv Biobank. 2024 Apr;22(2):98-109. doi: 10.1089/bio.2022.0112. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
7
The Stacked Community Engagement model: A practical model for developing community-engaged academic medical faculty.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Jan 11;7(1):e36. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.1. eCollection 2023.
10
School-Academic Partnerships in Support of Safe Return to Schools During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Pediatrics. 2022 Feb 1;149(12 Suppl 2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-054268C.

本文引用的文献

2
Community conceptualizations of health: implications for transdisciplinary team science.
Clin Transl Sci. 2011 Jun;4(3):163-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00289.x.
3
Lost in translation--basic science in the era of translational research.
Infect Immun. 2010 Feb;78(2):563-6. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01318-09. Epub 2009 Dec 28.
4
Faculty perspectives on community-based research: "I see this still as a journey".
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2009 Jun;4(2):3-16. doi: 10.1525/jer.2009.4.2.3.
5
Community-based participatory research from the margin to the mainstream: are researchers prepared?
Circulation. 2009 May 19;119(19):2633-42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.729863.
6
Interdisciplinary, translational, and community-based participatory research: finding a common language to improve cancer research.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Apr;18(4):1213-7. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-1166. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
7
The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration.
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S96-115. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.003.
8
Focus group discussion: a tool for health and medical research.
Singapore Med J. 2008 Mar;49(3):256-60; quiz 261.
9
The meaning of translational research and why it matters.
JAMA. 2008 Jan 9;299(2):211-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2007.26.
10
Translational research: moving discovery to practice.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Jan;81(1):126-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100029.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验