Community Health Program, Tufts University School of Arts and Science, Medford, Massachusetts, USA.
Clin Transl Sci. 2012 Aug;5(4):329-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2012.00433.x. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
This research sought to better understand how clinical and translational research is defined and perceived by community service providers. In addition, the research sought to elicit how the perspectives of service providers may hinder or facilitate collaborative research efforts. The study employed a qualitative methodology, focus groups. A nonprobability sampling strategy was used to recruit participants from three neighborhoods in the Tufts University's catchment area. Focus group findings add to the nascent body of literature on how community partners view clinical and translational research and researchers. Findings indicate that cultural disconnects, between researchers and community partners exist, as does mistrust, all of which serve as potential barriers to community research partnerships. This paper suggests rethinking the business of community engagement in researcher, particularly as it relates to building research capacity to approach, engage, and partner with communities.
本研究旨在更好地理解社区服务提供者如何定义和理解临床和转化研究。此外,该研究还试图了解服务提供者的观点可能如何阻碍或促进合作研究工作。该研究采用了定性方法,即焦点小组。采用非概率抽样策略,从塔夫茨大学服务范围内的三个社区招募参与者。焦点小组的调查结果增加了关于社区合作伙伴如何看待临床和转化研究以及研究人员的新兴文献。研究结果表明,研究人员和社区合作伙伴之间存在文化脱节和不信任,这些都是社区研究伙伴关系的潜在障碍。本文建议重新思考研究人员的社区参与业务,特别是在建立研究能力以接近、参与和与社区合作方面。