• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
"It has to be designed in a way that really challenges people's assumptions": preparing scholars to build equitable community research partnerships.“它必须以一种真正挑战人们假设的方式来设计”:培养学者建立公平的社区研究伙伴关系。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Sep 20;5(1):e182. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.858. eCollection 2021.
2
Addressing institutional and community barriers to development and implementation of community-engaged research through competency-based academic and community training.通过基于能力的学术和社区培训,解决社区参与式研究的发展和实施中的制度和社区障碍。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 12;10:1070475. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1070475. eCollection 2022.
3
Aligning community-engaged research competencies with online training resources across the Clinical and Translational Science Award Consortium.使社区参与研究能力与临床和转化科学奖联盟的在线培训资源保持一致。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Sep 11;5(1):e45. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.538.
4
Measuring Community-Engaged Research Contexts, Processes, and Outcomes: A Mapping Review.测量社区参与式研究的背景、过程和结果:一个映射综述。
Milbank Q. 2020 Jun;98(2):493-553. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12458. Epub 2020 May 19.
5
Training Academic and Community Investigator Teams for Community-Engaged Research: Program Development, Implementation, Evaluation and Replication.培训学术和社区参与研究团队:项目开发、实施、评估和复制。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(2):229-242. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0019.
6
Proceedings of the 2017 Advancing the Science of Community Engaged Research (CEnR) Conference.2017年社区参与研究(CEnR)科学进展会议论文集
BMC Proc. 2019 Apr 19;13(Suppl 3):3. doi: 10.1186/s12919-019-0164-y. eCollection 2019.
7
An exploratory study of Clinical and Translational Science Award community-engaged research training programs.临床与转化科学奖社区参与研究培训项目的探索性研究
J Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Jun 25;2(2):110-114. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.23. eCollection 2018 Apr.
8
Community-Engaged Research: Common Themes and Needs Identified by Investigators and Research Teams at an Emerging Academic Learning Health System.社区参与式研究:新兴学术学习健康系统中的研究人员和研究团队确定的常见主题和需求。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 8;18(8):3893. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083893.
9
Collaboration and Context in the Design of Community-Engaged Research Training.协作与情境:社区参与式研究培训的设计
Health Promot Pract. 2021 May;22(3):358-366. doi: 10.1177/1524839919894948. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
10
Researcher readiness for participating in community-engaged dissemination and implementation research: a conceptual framework of core competencies.研究人员参与社区参与式传播与实施研究的准备情况:核心能力的概念框架
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):393-404. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0486-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Make me a match: Creating research partnerships to build capacity for the evaluation of community initiatives.为我促成合作:建立研究伙伴关系以提升评估社区倡议的能力。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jun 3;9(1):e137. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.10068. eCollection 2025.
2
Respectful closure of a CEnR DNA integrity study: A bridge to sustained interactions with research participants.尊重地结束一项CEnR DNA完整性研究:与研究参与者持续互动的桥梁。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Apr 28;9(1):e110. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.82. eCollection 2025.
3
Design and implementation of a Community Expert Group comprised of people with lived expertise of homelessness at an academic health research center: a program description and analysis of challenges.学术健康研究中心内由有过无家可归生活经历的人组成的社区专家小组的设计与实施:项目描述及挑战分析
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 May 15;11(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00733-z.
4
Community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches in vaccination promotion: a scoping review.基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)在疫苗推广中的应用:范围综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Nov 5;23(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02278-1.
5
The community voices program to facilitate community-academic researcher partnerships: Stakeholder perspectives on the program's usefulness.促进社区与学术研究人员合作的社区声音项目:利益相关者对该项目实用性的看法。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Oct 20;7(1):e237. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.657. eCollection 2023.
6
Win-win interactions: Results and implications of a user needs assessment of clinical and translational scientists.双赢互动:临床与转化科学家用户需求评估的结果与启示
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Feb 7;7(1):e73. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.6. eCollection 2023.
7
A discussion among deans on advancing community engaged research.院长间关于推进社区参与式研究的讨论。
Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Apr;16(4):557-563. doi: 10.1111/cts.13478. Epub 2023 Jan 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples.立意抽样:复杂还是简单?研究案例
J Res Nurs. 2020 Dec;25(8):652-661. doi: 10.1177/1744987120927206. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
2
Aligning community-engaged research competencies with online training resources across the Clinical and Translational Science Award Consortium.使社区参与研究能力与临床和转化科学奖联盟的在线培训资源保持一致。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Sep 11;5(1):e45. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.538.
3
The ethical challenges and opportunities of implementing engagement strategies in health research.实施健康研究参与策略的伦理挑战与机遇。
Ann Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;59:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
4
Advancing Community-Engaged Research through Partnership Development: Overcoming Challenges Voiced by Community-Academic Partners.通过伙伴关系发展推进社区参与式研究:克服社区-学术伙伴提出的挑战。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(3):315-326. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0037.
5
Valuing All Voices: refining a trauma-informed, intersectional and critical reflexive framework for patient engagement in health research using a qualitative descriptive approach.重视所有声音:运用定性描述方法完善一个用于患者参与健康研究的创伤知情、交叉性和批判性反思框架。
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Jul 19;6:42. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00217-2. eCollection 2020.
6
Engage for Equity: A Long-Term Study of Community-Based Participatory Research and Community-Engaged Research Practices and Outcomes.参与公平:社区参与式研究和社区参与式研究实践与成果的长期研究。
Health Educ Behav. 2020 Jun;47(3):380-390. doi: 10.1177/1090198119897075.
7
Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131.定性数据分析的主题分析:AMEE 指南第 131 号。
Med Teach. 2020 Aug;42(8):846-854. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030. Epub 2020 May 1.
8
Addressing power dynamics in community-engaged research partnerships.解决社区参与式研究伙伴关系中的权力动态问题。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Apr 5;4(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s41687-020-00191-z.
9
Collaboration and Context in the Design of Community-Engaged Research Training.协作与情境:社区参与式研究培训的设计
Health Promot Pract. 2021 May;22(3):358-366. doi: 10.1177/1524839919894948. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
10
Partnerships, Processes, and Outcomes: A Health Equity-Focused Scoping Meta-Review of Community-Engaged Scholarship.伙伴关系、流程和结果:以健康公平为重点的社区参与式学术研究的范围元综述。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2020 Apr 2;41:177-199. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094220. Epub 2020 Jan 10.

“它必须以一种真正挑战人们假设的方式来设计”:培养学者建立公平的社区研究伙伴关系。

"It has to be designed in a way that really challenges people's assumptions": preparing scholars to build equitable community research partnerships.

作者信息

Tang Yan Catalina, Haque Samiya, Chassler Deborah, Lobb Rebecca, Battaglia Tracy, Sprague Martinez Linda

机构信息

Boston University School of Social Work, Boston, MA, USA.

Boston University Clinical Translational Science Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Sep 20;5(1):e182. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.858. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1017/cts.2021.858
PMID:34849257
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8596064/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Clinical and Translational Award (CTSA) programs are developing relevant training for researchers and community stakeholders participating in community-engaged research (CEnR). However, there is limited research exploring the ways community stakeholders and partners with key CEnR experiences can inform and shape training priorities for prospective CEnR scholars to build meaningful and equitable partnerships.

METHODS

This study conducted and analyzed online individual semi-structured in-depth interviews with community stakeholders ( = 13) engaged in CEnR to identify training priorities for graduate students and emerging scholars.

FINDINGS

Thematic analysis of 13 interview transcripts revealed four major training priorities for prospective scholars interested in engaging in CEnR: 1) researcher's positionality, 2) equitable power sharing, 3) funding, and 4) ethics.

CONCLUSION

Building equitable research partnerships was a central theme woven across all four training priorities. Further research should focus on examining the development, implementation, and evaluation of CEnR training in partnership with community stakeholders and partners with relevant CEnR experience. Adopting a collaborative approach to incorporate both community stakeholders and researchers' priorities can align training competencies to better prepare scholars to engage in building research partnerships.

摘要

引言

临床与转化奖(CTSA)项目正在为参与社区参与研究(CEnR)的研究人员和社区利益相关者开展相关培训。然而,探索社区利益相关者以及具有关键CEnR经验的合作伙伴如何为未来的CEnR学者提供信息并塑造培训重点,以建立有意义且公平的伙伴关系的研究有限。

方法

本研究对参与CEnR的社区利益相关者(n = 13)进行并分析了在线个人半结构化深度访谈,以确定研究生和新兴学者的培训重点。

结果

对13份访谈记录的主题分析揭示了对有兴趣参与CEnR的未来学者的四个主要培训重点:1)研究者的立场,2)公平的权力分享,3)资金,以及4)伦理。

结论

建立公平的研究伙伴关系是贯穿所有四个培训重点的核心主题。进一步的研究应侧重于与社区利益相关者以及具有相关CEnR经验的合作伙伴合作,考察CEnR培训的开发、实施和评估。采用合作方法纳入社区利益相关者和研究人员的优先事项,可以使培训能力保持一致,从而更好地让学者为建立研究伙伴关系做好准备。