Suppr超能文献

“它必须以一种真正挑战人们假设的方式来设计”:培养学者建立公平的社区研究伙伴关系。

"It has to be designed in a way that really challenges people's assumptions": preparing scholars to build equitable community research partnerships.

作者信息

Tang Yan Catalina, Haque Samiya, Chassler Deborah, Lobb Rebecca, Battaglia Tracy, Sprague Martinez Linda

机构信息

Boston University School of Social Work, Boston, MA, USA.

Boston University Clinical Translational Science Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Sep 20;5(1):e182. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.858. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Clinical and Translational Award (CTSA) programs are developing relevant training for researchers and community stakeholders participating in community-engaged research (CEnR). However, there is limited research exploring the ways community stakeholders and partners with key CEnR experiences can inform and shape training priorities for prospective CEnR scholars to build meaningful and equitable partnerships.

METHODS

This study conducted and analyzed online individual semi-structured in-depth interviews with community stakeholders ( = 13) engaged in CEnR to identify training priorities for graduate students and emerging scholars.

FINDINGS

Thematic analysis of 13 interview transcripts revealed four major training priorities for prospective scholars interested in engaging in CEnR: 1) researcher's positionality, 2) equitable power sharing, 3) funding, and 4) ethics.

CONCLUSION

Building equitable research partnerships was a central theme woven across all four training priorities. Further research should focus on examining the development, implementation, and evaluation of CEnR training in partnership with community stakeholders and partners with relevant CEnR experience. Adopting a collaborative approach to incorporate both community stakeholders and researchers' priorities can align training competencies to better prepare scholars to engage in building research partnerships.

摘要

引言

临床与转化奖(CTSA)项目正在为参与社区参与研究(CEnR)的研究人员和社区利益相关者开展相关培训。然而,探索社区利益相关者以及具有关键CEnR经验的合作伙伴如何为未来的CEnR学者提供信息并塑造培训重点,以建立有意义且公平的伙伴关系的研究有限。

方法

本研究对参与CEnR的社区利益相关者(n = 13)进行并分析了在线个人半结构化深度访谈,以确定研究生和新兴学者的培训重点。

结果

对13份访谈记录的主题分析揭示了对有兴趣参与CEnR的未来学者的四个主要培训重点:1)研究者的立场,2)公平的权力分享,3)资金,以及4)伦理。

结论

建立公平的研究伙伴关系是贯穿所有四个培训重点的核心主题。进一步的研究应侧重于与社区利益相关者以及具有相关CEnR经验的合作伙伴合作,考察CEnR培训的开发、实施和评估。采用合作方法纳入社区利益相关者和研究人员的优先事项,可以使培训能力保持一致,从而更好地让学者为建立研究伙伴关系做好准备。

相似文献

9
Collaboration and Context in the Design of Community-Engaged Research Training.协作与情境:社区参与式研究培训的设计
Health Promot Pract. 2021 May;22(3):358-366. doi: 10.1177/1524839919894948. Epub 2020 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

7
A discussion among deans on advancing community engaged research.院长间关于推进社区参与式研究的讨论。
Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Apr;16(4):557-563. doi: 10.1111/cts.13478. Epub 2023 Jan 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples.立意抽样:复杂还是简单?研究案例
J Res Nurs. 2020 Dec;25(8):652-661. doi: 10.1177/1744987120927206. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
7
Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131.定性数据分析的主题分析:AMEE 指南第 131 号。
Med Teach. 2020 Aug;42(8):846-854. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030. Epub 2020 May 1.
9
Collaboration and Context in the Design of Community-Engaged Research Training.协作与情境:社区参与式研究培训的设计
Health Promot Pract. 2021 May;22(3):358-366. doi: 10.1177/1524839919894948. Epub 2020 Jan 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验