Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Yongon-dong, Chongno-gu, Korea.
Acad Radiol. 2012 Nov;19(11):1353-61. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.06.011. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
The assessment of the therapeutic response of high-grade gliomas treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) using temozolomide is difficult because of the frequent occurrence of early imaging changes that are indistinguishable from tumor progression, termed pseudoprogression. The purpose of this study was to determine whether diffusion-weighted imaging could be used to differentiate true progression and pseudoprogression.
Magnetic resonance images and diffusion-weighted images obtained within 2 months of CCRT completion in patients with high-grade gliomas were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 22 patients with increases in measurable enhancing regions were identified and classified into true progression and pseudoprogression groups on the basis of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images obtained 12 weeks after CCRT. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of diffusion-weighted images and apparent diffusion coefficient maps, respectively, was performed to discriminate true progression and pseudoprogression. Statistical analyses were performed using Fisher's exact test, unpaired t tests, and receiver-operating characteristic analysis.
The true progression group showed a higher incidence of homogeneous or multifocal high signal intensity on diffusion-weighted images (seven of 10 patients [70%]), whereas rim high or no high signal intensity (10 of 12 [83%]) was observed in the pseudoprogression group (P = .027). True progression was defined by newly appearing or enlarged enhancing lesions with mean apparent diffusion coefficient values of 1200 × 10(-6) mm(2)/s inside the radiation field after CCRT; the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 80% (eight of 10), 83.3% (10 of 12), and 81.2% (18 of 22), respectively.
The assessment of diffusion-weighted images for patients with increases of measurable enhancing regions 2 months after CCRT completion is useful for differentiating true progression from pseudoprogression.
在接受同步放化疗(CCRT)联合替莫唑胺治疗的高级别胶质瘤患者中,由于常出现与肿瘤进展难以区分的早期影像学改变,即假性进展,因此评估其治疗反应较为困难。本研究旨在探讨弥散加权成像(DWI)是否有助于鉴别真性进展和假性进展。
回顾性分析了接受 CCRT 治疗后 2 个月内出现可测量增强区域增大的高级别胶质瘤患者的磁共振成像和 DWI 资料。根据 CCRT 后 12 周增强磁共振成像结果,将 22 例可测量增强区域增大的患者分为真性进展组和假性进展组。分别对 DWI 及表观弥散系数图进行定性和定量分析,以鉴别真性进展和假性进展。采用 Fisher 确切概率法、独立样本 t 检验和受试者工作特征曲线分析进行统计学分析。
真性进展组在 DWI 上表现为均匀或多灶性高信号强度的发生率较高(7 例,70%),而假性进展组则表现为环形或无高信号强度(12 例,83%)(P =.027)。真性进展定义为 CCRT 后出现新的或增大的强化病灶,其在放射野内的平均表观弥散系数值为 1200×10(-6)mm(2)/s;敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为 80%(10 例中的 8 例)、83.3%(12 例中的 10 例)和 81.2%(22 例中的 18 例)。
在接受 CCRT 治疗 2 个月后出现可测量强化区域增大的患者中,DWI 有助于鉴别真性进展和假性进展。