Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia.
Injury. 2012 Nov;43(11):1917-23. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.07.185. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
BACKGROUND: Trauma registry data are almost always incomplete. Multiple imputation can reduce bias in registry analyses but the ideal approach would be to improve data capture. The aim of this study was to identify, using multiple imputation, which type of patients were most likely to have incomplete data. METHODS: An analysis of prospectively collected regional trauma registry data over one year was performed. Analyses were conducted following complete data estimation using multiple imputation. Variables necessary for TRISS analysis and with incomplete data were analysed. For each variable, logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of missingness. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: There were 2520 cases. The variables with the greatest proportion of missing observations were respiratory rate, GCS, Qualifier (of GCS and respiratory rate) and systolic blood pressure. The Qualifier variable described whether or not the patient was intubated and mechanically ventilated at the time the first hospital GCS and respiratory rate were recorded. GCS and respiratory rate were more likely to be missing (imputed) when abnormal (unadjusted ORs: 8.6 (p<0.001) and 2.1 (p=0.02), respectively). The most important determinant of a valid GCS or respiratory rate was the Qualifier. There was no association between whether the systolic blood pressure and Qualifier were missing (imputed) and whether they were estimated to be abnormal. Following multivariable analysis, data for all four variables were more likely to be missing when the patient died in hospital. Additional independent predictors of a missing GCS or respiratory rate were an abnormal pre-hospital GCS and severe chest injury. The Qualifier and systolic blood pressure were more likely to be missing where the patient was transferred from the primary hospital. CONCLUSION: The major independent predictor of missing primary hospital physiological variables was death in hospital. An abnormal GCS was more likely to be missing from the regional trauma registry dataset. Predictors of a missing GCS or respiratory rate included whether the patient was intubated, an abnormal pre-hospital GCS and severe chest injury. Augmenting resources to record the initial observations of the more severely injured patients would improve data quality. Multiple imputation can be used to inform data capture.
背景:创伤登记处的数据几乎总是不完整的。多重插补可以减少登记分析中的偏差,但理想的方法是改进数据采集。本研究的目的是使用多重插补确定哪些类型的患者最有可能数据不完整。
方法:对一年来前瞻性收集的区域创伤登记处数据进行分析。使用多重插补进行完全数据估计后进行分析。分析了需要 TRISS 分析且数据不完整的变量。对于每个变量,进行逻辑回归分析以确定缺失的预测因素。p 值小于 0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
结果:共有 2520 例患者。缺失观测值比例最大的变量是呼吸频率、GCS、限定符(GCS 和呼吸频率的限定符)和收缩压。限定符变量描述了患者在首次记录医院 GCS 和呼吸频率时是否插管和机械通气。GCS 和呼吸频率更有可能缺失(插补)(未调整的 OR:8.6(p<0.001)和 2.1(p=0.02))。GCS 和呼吸频率是否有效的最重要决定因素是限定符。收缩压和限定符是否缺失(插补)与它们是否估计为异常之间没有关联。多变量分析后,当患者在医院死亡时,所有四个变量的数据更有可能缺失。GCS 或呼吸频率缺失的其他独立预测因素是院前 GCS 异常和严重胸部损伤。当患者从主要医院转来时,限定符和收缩压更有可能缺失。
结论:医院死亡是主要的独立预测因素,导致主要医院生理变量缺失。区域创伤登记处数据集更有可能缺失异常 GCS。GCS 或呼吸频率缺失的预测因素包括患者是否插管、院前 GCS 异常和严重胸部损伤。增加资源以记录更严重受伤患者的初始观察结果将提高数据质量。多重插补可用于告知数据采集。
J Trauma. 2005-9
Acad Emerg Med. 2011-9-26
J Trauma. 2007-8
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025-6-27
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023-12-19
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023-9-26
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023-1-1