Niessen Puck Domino Monique, Krijnen Pieta, Leijdesdorff Henry Alexander, Peul Wilco Cornelis, Schipper Inger Birgitta
Department of Trauma Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Acute Care Network West Netherlands, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jun 27;51(1):239. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02909-4.
PURPOSE: Both the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) for head injuries quantify traumatic brain injury (TBI) severity. The GCS is based on brain physiology of consciousness, whereas the AIS is an anatomical injury scoring system. This study aimed to describe the correlation of GCS with maximal AIS-Head (maxAIS) and summative AIS-Head (sumAIS) in TBI patients. METHODS: Data of 4996 adult TBI patients admitted to two level 1 trauma centers in the Netherlands between 2015 and 2021 were selected from the regional trauma registry. The association of GCS with maxAIS and sumAIS was quantified using Spearman rank correlation coefficients (r). RESULTS: For 39% of the patients, the GCS was not documented in the trauma registry. These patients had less severe head injuries than the 3051 patients with documented GCS scores, who were further analyzed. Among those with severe head injuries (AIS-Head ≥ 4), 53% had a GCS score ≥ 13. The GCS showed a weak inverse relationship with both maxAIS and sumAIS (r -0.33 and - 0.34, respectively, both p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The correlation between physiological alterations (GCS) and anatomical brain damage (AIS) in patients with TBI patients, represented by the GCS and AIS respectively, is weak. Additionally, the GCS appears to underestimate the severity of AIS coded severe TBI. Recognizing this limited correlation is important for valid TBI research.
目的:格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)和头部损伤简略分级标准(AIS)均用于量化创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的严重程度。GCS基于意识的脑生理学,而AIS是一种解剖学损伤评分系统。本研究旨在描述TBI患者中GCS与最大AIS-头部(maxAIS)和累计AIS-头部(sumAIS)之间的相关性。 方法:从荷兰两个一级创伤中心的区域创伤登记处选取2015年至2021年间收治的4996例成年TBI患者的数据。使用Spearman等级相关系数(r)量化GCS与maxAIS和sumAIS之间的关联。 结果:39%的患者在创伤登记处未记录GCS。这些患者的头部损伤比有记录GCS评分的3051例患者轻,对后者进行了进一步分析。在重度头部损伤(AIS-头部≥4)患者中,53%的患者GCS评分≥13。GCS与maxAIS和sumAIS均呈弱负相关(r分别为-0.33和-0.34,均p<0.001)。 结论:TBI患者中分别由GCS和AIS代表的生理改变(GCS)与脑解剖损伤(AIS)之间的相关性较弱。此外,GCS似乎低估了编码为重度TBI的AIS的严重程度。认识到这种有限的相关性对于有效的TBI研究很重要。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025-6-27
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024-4-30
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-28
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012-12-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-12-22
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023-8
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018
Brain Inj. 2016
Lancet Neurol. 2014-8