• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肌间裂平面能否提供合适的横向螺钉角度?两种脊柱旁入路的比较。

Can intermuscular cleavage planes provide proper transverse screw angle? Comparison of two paraspinal approaches.

机构信息

Department of Spine Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 415 Fengyang Rd, Huangpu District, Shanghai 200003, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2013 Jan;22(1):123-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2464-z. Epub 2012 Aug 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-012-2464-z
PMID:22886569
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3540324/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to determine which paraspinal approach provided a better transverse screw angle (TSA) for each vertebral level in lower lumbar surgery.

METHODS

Axial computed tomography (CT) images of 100 patients, from L3 to S1, were used to measure the angulation parameters, including transverse pedicle angle (TPA) and transverse cleavage plane angle (TCPA) of entry from the two approaches. The difference value between TCPA and TPA, defined as difference angle (DA), was calculated. Statistical differences of DA obtained by the two approaches and the angulation parameters between sexes, and the correlation between each angulation parameter and age or body mass index (BMI) were analyzed.

RESULTS

TPA ranged from about 16° at L3 to 30° at S1. TCPA through the Wiltse's and Weaver's approach ranged from about -10° and 25° at L3 to 12° and 32° at S1, respectively. The absolute values of DA through the Weaver's approach were significantly lower than those through the Wiltse's approach at each level. The angulation parameters showed no significant difference with sex and no significant correlation with age or BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

In the lower lumbar vertebrae (L3-L5) and S1, pedicle screw placement through the Weaver's approach may more easily yield the preferred TSA consistent with TPA than that through the Wiltse's approach. The reference values obtained in this paper may be applied regardless of sex, age or BMI and the descriptive statistical results may be used as references for applying the two paraspinal approaches.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定在下腰椎手术中,对于每个椎体水平,哪种椎旁入路能提供更好的横向螺钉角度(TSA)。

方法

使用 100 例患者(L3 至 S1)的轴向计算机断层扫描(CT)图像来测量角度参数,包括从两种入路测量的横向椎弓根角度(TPA)和横向裂平面角度(TCPA)。定义 TCPA 与 TPA 之间的差值为差角(DA),并计算其差值。分析两种入路获得的 DA 差值的统计学差异,以及性别之间的角度参数差异,以及各角度参数与年龄或体重指数(BMI)之间的相关性。

结果

TPA 范围从 L3 的约 16°到 S1 的约 30°。通过 Wiltse 和 Weaver 入路的 TCPA 范围从 L3 的约-10°到 25°到 S1 的约 12°到 32°。通过 Weaver 入路的 DA 的绝对值明显低于通过 Wiltse 入路的绝对值。角度参数在性别上无显著差异,与年龄或 BMI 无显著相关性。

结论

在下腰椎(L3-L5)和 S1 中,与通过 Wiltse 入路相比,通过 Weaver 入路放置椎弓根螺钉可能更容易获得与 TPA 一致的首选 TSA。本文获得的参考值可应用于性别、年龄或 BMI ,且描述性统计结果可作为应用两种椎旁入路的参考。

相似文献

1
Can intermuscular cleavage planes provide proper transverse screw angle? Comparison of two paraspinal approaches.肌间裂平面能否提供合适的横向螺钉角度?两种脊柱旁入路的比较。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Jan;22(1):123-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2464-z. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
2
Multilevel magnetic resonance imaging analysis of multifidus-longissimus cleavage planes in the lumbar spine and potential clinical applications to Wiltse's paraspinal approach.腰椎多裂肌-最长肌间隙的多层磁共振成像分析及其在 Wiltse 经椎间旁入路中的潜在临床应用。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jul 15;36(16):1263-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f520e8.
3
Comparison of Wiltse's paraspinal approach and open book laminectomy for thoracolumbar burst fractures with greenstick lamina fractures: a randomized controlled trial.Wiltse椎旁入路与开放性书本式椎板切除术治疗伴有青枝状椎板骨折的胸腰椎爆裂骨折的比较:一项随机对照试验
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Mar 2;13(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0743-z.
4
Anatomic parameters: direct intralaminar screw repair of spondylolysis.解剖参数:峡部裂的直接板层内螺钉修复。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Feb 1;39(3):E153-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000118.
5
Morphometric study of the lumbar pedicle in the Indian population as related to pedicular screw fixation.印度人群中与椎弓根螺钉固定相关的腰椎椎弓根形态学研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Mar 1;27(5):453-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200203010-00004.
6
Does a deep seated L5 vertebra position with respect to the iliac crests affect the accuracy of percutaneous pedicle screw placement at lumbosacral junction?L5椎体相对于髂嵴的深部位置是否会影响腰骶部经皮椎弓根螺钉置入的准确性?
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 May 5;18(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1537-x.
7
An anatomical study of the mid-lateral pars relative to the pedicle footprint in the lower lumbar spine.下腰椎中外侧部相对于椎弓根投影区的解剖学研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jun 1;34(13):1355-62. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a4f3a9.
8
[Study of pedicle screw placement assisted by intraoperative three-dimensional navigation in lumbar vertebrae with axial rotation].[术中三维导航辅助下腰椎轴向旋转时椎弓根螺钉置入的研究]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Jun 1;48(11):838-41.
9
Advantages of the paraspinal muscle splitting approach in comparison with conventional midline approach for s1 pedicle screw placement.与传统正中入路相比,经多裂肌入路行 S1 椎弓根螺钉置钉的优势。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 May 15;35(11):E452-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ce0696.
10
Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in posterior lumbosacral instrumentation by computer tomography evaluation: A multi-centric retrospective clinical study.计算机断层扫描评估后路腰骶部内固定置钉准确性的多中心回顾性临床研究。
Int J Surg. 2017 Jul;43:46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.05.041. Epub 2017 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Segmental Interbody, Muscle-Preserving, Ligamentotaxis-Enabled Reduction: "SIMPLER" Technique for cMIS Correction of ASD.节段间椎体间融合、保留肌肉、借助韧带整复实现复位:用于成人脊柱畸形(ASD)的计算机辅助微创脊柱手术(cMIS)矫正的“更简单”技术
Int J Spine Surg. 2025 Feb 24;19(S1):S37-S54. doi: 10.14444/8714.
2
CT and MRI Determination of Intermuscular Space within Lumbar Paraspinal Muscles at Different Intervertebral Disc Levels.CT和MRI对不同椎间盘水平腰椎旁肌肉肌间隙的测定
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 12;10(10):e0140315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140315. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
Paraspinal-approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar foraminal stenosis.经椎间孔入路脊柱旁腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎侧隐窝狭窄症。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Oct;13(4):500-8. doi: 10.3171/2010.4.SPINE09691.
2
Advantages of the paraspinal muscle splitting approach in comparison with conventional midline approach for s1 pedicle screw placement.与传统正中入路相比,经多裂肌入路行 S1 椎弓根螺钉置钉的优势。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 May 15;35(11):E452-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ce0696.
3
Lower dorsal and lumbar pedicle morphometry in Indian population: a study of four hundred fifty vertebrae.印度人群中下背部和腰部椎弓根形态学研究:四百五十个椎体的研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 May 1;35(10):E378-84. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cb7f2b.
4
Anatomic features of the paramedian muscle-splitting approaches to the lumbar spine.腰椎旁正中肌劈开入路的解剖学特点。
Neurosurgery. 2010 Mar;66(3 Suppl Operative):13-24; discussion 24-5. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000350866.25760.33.
5
The human sacrum and safe approaches for screw placement.人类骶骨及螺钉置入的安全入路。
J Clin Neurosci. 2009 Aug;16(8):1046-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2008.07.081. Epub 2009 May 12.
6
Lateral intramuscular planar approach to the lumbar spine and sacrum. Technical note.腰椎和骶骨的外侧肌内平面入路。技术说明。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Aug;7(2):270-3. doi: 10.3171/SPI-07/08/270.
7
Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis.椎弓根螺钉置入准确性:一项荟萃分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Feb 1;32(3):E111-20. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000254048.79024.8b.
8
Back pain and disability after lumbar laminectomy: is there a relationship to muscle retraction?腰椎板切除术后的背痛与残疾:与肌肉牵开有关吗?
Neurosurgery. 2004 Jun;54(6):1413-20; discussion 1420. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000124751.57121.a6.
9
Closed posterior superior iliac spine impeding pediculocorporeal S-1 screw insertion.闭合性髂后上棘妨碍椎弓根-椎体S-1螺钉置入。
J Neurosurg. 2003 Sep;99(2 Suppl):229-34. doi: 10.3171/spi.2003.99.2.0229.
10
Pedicle screw placement at the sacrum: anatomical characterization and limitations at S1.骶骨椎弓根螺钉置入:S1的解剖学特征及局限性
J Spinal Disord. 1999 Jun;12(3):227-33.