Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, México, DF, Mexico.
Am J Ind Med. 2013 Jan;56(1):38-48. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22098. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
To evaluate the association of heart rate variability with job strain in first year resident physicians.
We performed the study at the "Manuel Gea González" General Hospital in Mexico City. 54 resident doctors were studied over a period of 24 hr in their first year of specialization. Two questionnaires were administered: the first on general demographics, and the second, the Job Content Questionnaire. Heart rate variability was evaluated through the frequency domain (low-frequency power, high-frequency power, and low-frequency power/high-frequency power ratio) and time domain (SDNN). The doctors wore a Holter monitor over a 24-hr period, which included a workday plus their on-call time. They recorded their activities in a log.
Compared to physicians in the "low strain" category, physicians working in the "passive" category had lower overall peak-to-peak cardiac variability (standard deviation of N-N intervals, SDNN), -9.08% (95% CI -17.97, 0.74), a -25% (95% CI -45.00, 0.22) lower high-frequency power, and -26.95% (95% CI -39.00, -12.53) lower low-frequency power. Physicians working in the "high strain" category had lower low-frequency power, -17.85% (95%CI -32.34, -0.25), and lower low-frequency/high-frequency ratio -24.29% (95% CI 38.08, 7.42) compared to those in the "low strain" category.
High job strain and low job control among medical residents were associated with several indicators of lowered heart rate variability. Thus, analysis of heart rate variability may be an informative marker for evaluating the physiological impacts of workplace stressors.
评估心率变异性与第一年住院医师工作压力的关系。
我们在墨西哥城的“曼努埃尔·盖亚·冈萨雷斯”综合医院进行了这项研究。对 54 名住院医师进行了为期 24 小时的研究,他们在专业培训的第一年。我们使用了两个问卷:第一个是一般人口统计学问卷,第二个是工作内容问卷。通过频域(低频功率、高频功率和低频功率/高频功率比)和时域(SDNN)评估心率变异性。医生在 24 小时内佩戴动态心电图监测仪,其中包括工作日和值班时间。他们在日志中记录自己的活动。
与处于“低压力”类别的医生相比,处于“被动”类别的医生整体峰值到峰值心搏变异(NN 间期标准差,SDNN)较低,为-9.08%(95%置信区间-17.97,0.74),高频功率降低 25%(95%置信区间-45.00,0.22),低频功率降低 26.95%(95%置信区间-39.00,-12.53)。处于“高压力”类别的医生的低频功率降低了 17.85%(95%置信区间-32.34,-0.25),低频/高频比降低了 24.29%(95%置信区间 38.08,7.42),与处于“低压力”类别的医生相比。
住院医师的工作压力高和工作控制能力低与心率变异性的几个指标降低有关。因此,心率变异性分析可能是评估工作场所应激源对生理影响的一个信息性指标。