• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床预测规则识别发生药物不良事件的高危住院患者:JADE 研究。

Clinical prediction rule to identify high-risk inpatients for adverse drug events: the JADE Study.

机构信息

Center for General Internal Medicine and Emergency Care, Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka-sayama, Japan.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 Nov;21(11):1221-6. doi: 10.1002/pds.3331. Epub 2012 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1002/pds.3331
PMID:22887972
Abstract

PURPOSE

Adverse drug events (ADEs) are common health problems worldwide. Developing a prediction rule to identify patients at high risk for ADEs to prevent or ameliorate ADEs could be one attractive strategy.

METHODS

The Japan Adverse Drug Events (JADE) study is a prospective cohort study including 3459 participants. We randomly divided the JADE study cohort into the derivation and the validation sets, using an automated random digit generator. We calculated the probabilities of ADE in each patient in the validation set after applying the prediction rule developed in the derivation set. The actual incidence and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in the validation set were compared with those in the derivation set to evaluate the prognostic ability of our developed prediction rule.

RESULTS

The developed prediction rule included eight independent risk factors. Each patient in the validation set was classified into three categories of risk for the ADEs according to the probability of ADEs calculated by the developed prediction rule. Eight percent (137/1730) of patients in the validation set fell into the high-risk group, and 35% of this group (48/137) had at least one ADE. The AUC in the validation set was 0.63 (95%CI 0.60-0.66), and the performance to discriminate the probability of ADE was similar (p = 0.08) compared with that in the derivation set.

CONCLUSIONS

This prediction rule had the modest predictive ability and could help physicians and other healthcare professionals to make an estimation of patients at high risk for ADEs.

摘要

目的

药物不良反应(ADE)是全球常见的健康问题。开发一种预测规则来识别 ADE 高风险患者,以预防或减轻 ADE,可能是一种有吸引力的策略。

方法

日本药物不良反应(JADE)研究是一项包括 3459 名参与者的前瞻性队列研究。我们使用自动随机数字发生器将 JADE 研究队列随机分为推导集和验证集。我们在推导集中应用开发的预测规则后,计算验证集中每个患者发生 ADE 的概率。在验证集中比较实际发生率和接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)与推导集中的发生率和 AUC,以评估我们开发的预测规则的预后能力。

结果

开发的预测规则包括 8 个独立的危险因素。根据推导规则计算出的 ADE 概率,验证集中的每位患者被分为 ADE 风险的三个类别。验证集中 8%(137/1730)的患者属于高危组,该组 35%(48/137)的患者至少发生了一次 ADE。验证集中的 AUC 为 0.63(95%CI 0.60-0.66),与推导集中的性能相比,区分 ADE 概率的性能相似(p=0.08)。

结论

该预测规则具有适度的预测能力,可以帮助医生和其他医疗保健专业人员评估 ADE 高风险患者。

相似文献

1
Clinical prediction rule to identify high-risk inpatients for adverse drug events: the JADE Study.临床预测规则识别发生药物不良事件的高危住院患者:JADE 研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 Nov;21(11):1221-6. doi: 10.1002/pds.3331. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
2
Performance of the adverse drug event trigger tool and the global trigger tool for identifying adverse drug events: experience in a Belgian hospital.不良药物事件触发工具和全球触发工具在识别不良药物事件中的性能:比利时一家医院的经验。
Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Nov;47(11):1414-9. doi: 10.1177/1060028013500939.
3
Prospective derivation and validation of a clinical prediction rule for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.复发性艰难梭菌感染临床预测规则的前瞻性推导与验证
Gastroenterology. 2009 Apr;136(4):1206-14. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.038. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
4
The epidemiology of adverse drug events and medication errors among psychiatric inpatients in Japan: the JADE study.日本精神科住院患者药物不良事件和用药错误的流行病学:JADE研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Aug 30;16(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1009-0.
5
Derivation and validation of in-hospital mortality prediction models in ischaemic stroke patients using administrative data.利用行政数据对缺血性脑卒中患者院内死亡率预测模型的推导和验证。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;35(1):73-80. doi: 10.1159/000346090. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
6
A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with pulmonary embolism.一种用于识别低风险肺栓塞患者的预测规则。
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Jan 23;166(2):169-75. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.2.169.
7
Association of Adverse Events With Antibiotic Use in Hospitalized Patients.住院患者不良事件与抗生素使用的关联
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Sep 1;177(9):1308-1315. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1938.
8
Epidemiology, comparative methods of detection, and preventability of adverse drug events.药物不良事件的流行病学、比较检测方法及可预防性
Ann Pharmacother. 2005 Jul-Aug;39(7-8):1169-74. doi: 10.1345/aph.1E559. Epub 2005 May 31.
9
Adverse drug events identified by triggers at a teaching hospital in Brazil.巴西一家教学医院通过触发因素识别出的药物不良事件。
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2014 Dec 13;15:71. doi: 10.1186/2050-6511-15-71.
10
[CCERW: a new rule to predict treatment failure in patients with community-acquired pneumonia in middle aged and elderly people].[CCERW:预测中老年社区获得性肺炎患者治疗失败的新规则]
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2011 Jan;23(1):10-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug Related Problems among Older Inpatients at a Tertiary Care Setting.三级护理机构中老年住院患者的药物相关问题
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 13;13(6):1638. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061638.
2
Comparison of prioritisation algorithms for the selection of patients for medication reviews in the emergency department: a cross-sectional study.比较急诊药物审查中患者选择的优先级算法:一项横断面研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2023 Aug;45(4):884-892. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01582-0. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
3
Systematic Review of Risk Factors Assessed in Predictive Scoring Tools for Drug-Related Problems in Inpatients.
住院患者药物相关问题预测评分工具中评估的风险因素的系统评价
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 1;11(17):5185. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175185.
4
Epidemiology of adverse drug events and medication errors in four nursing homes in Japan: the Japan Adverse Drug Events (JADE) Study.日本四家养老院中药物不良事件和用药错误的流行病学研究:日本药物不良事件(JADE)研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Dec;31(12):878-887. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014280. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
5
The Double Burden of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Polypharmacy on Geriatric Population - Public Health Implications.新冠疫情与老年人群多重用药的双重负担——对公共卫生的影响
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2020 Oct 20;16:1007-1022. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S272908. eCollection 2020.
6
Effects of stratified medication review in high-risk patients at admission to hospital: a randomised controlled trial.分层药物审查对高危患者入院时的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2020 Sep 20;11:2042098620957142. doi: 10.1177/2042098620957142. eCollection 2020.
7
Italian Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations for Outpatients' Adverse Drug Events: 12-Year Active Pharmacovigilance Surveillance (The MEREAFaPS Study).意大利急诊科门诊患者药物不良事件的就诊和住院情况:12年主动药物警戒监测(MEREAFaPS研究)
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Apr 6;11:412. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00412. eCollection 2020.
8
Review of structured guides for deprescribing.减药结构化指南综述。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2017 Jan;24(1):51-57. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2015-000864.
9
Machine Learning to Predict, Detect, and Intervene Older Adults Vulnerable for Adverse Drug Events in the Emergency Department.机器学习用于预测、检测和干预急诊科中易发生药物不良事件的老年人。
J Med Toxicol. 2018 Sep;14(3):248-252. doi: 10.1007/s13181-018-0667-3. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
10
Improving the assessment of adverse drug reactions using the Naranjo Algorithm in daily practice: The Japan Adverse Drug Events Study.利用 Naranjo 算法在日常实践中改进药物不良反应评估:日本药物不良事件研究。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2018 Feb;6(1). doi: 10.1002/prp2.373.