Suppr超能文献

减药结构化指南综述。

Review of structured guides for deprescribing.

作者信息

Scott Ian, Anderson Kristen, Freeman Christopher

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.

Centre of Research Excellence in Quality & Safety in Integrated Primary-Secondary Care, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2017 Jan;24(1):51-57. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2015-000864.

Abstract

Avoiding inappropriate polypharmacy has become increasingly recognised as a safety imperative for older patient care. Deprescribing is an active process of reviewing all medications being used by individual patients that prompts clinicians to consider which medications have unfavourable risk-benefit trade-offs in the context of illness severity, advanced age, multi-morbidity, physical and emotional capacity, life expectancy, care goals and personal preferences. Structured guides to deprescribing include algorithms, flow charts or tables which are patient-directed and aim to guide the clinician through sequential steps in deciding which medications should be targeted for discontinuation. In this narrative review, we describe seven structured deprescribing guides whose stated purpose included the reduction of polypharmacy, their use was not restricted to a single drug or drug class and they had undergone some form of efficacy testing. There was considerable heterogeneity in guide design and content, with some guides constituting little more than a set of principles while others entail detailed processes and sub-steps which addressed multiple determinants of drug appropriateness. Evidence of effectiveness for each guide was limited in that none have been evaluated in randomised controlled trials, that pilot or feasibility studies have involved relatively small patient samples, that intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities have not been determined and that most have been studied in hospital settings. Which is most useful to clinicians is unknown in the absence of head-to-head comparisons. While most guides have face validity, more research is needed for determining effectiveness and ease of use in routine clinical practice, especially in primary care settings.

摘要

避免不适当的多重用药已日益被视为老年患者护理中的一项安全要务。减药是一个积极审查个体患者正在使用的所有药物的过程,促使临床医生在疾病严重程度、高龄、多种疾病、身体和情感能力、预期寿命、护理目标及个人偏好的背景下,考虑哪些药物存在不利的风险效益权衡。减药的结构化指南包括算法、流程图或表格,这些以患者为导向,旨在引导临床医生通过一系列步骤来决定应针对哪些药物进行停药。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们描述了七种结构化减药指南,其既定目的包括减少多重用药,其使用不限于单一药物或药物类别,并且它们都经过了某种形式的疗效测试。指南的设计和内容存在相当大的异质性,一些指南只不过是一套原则,而其他指南则包含详细的流程和子步骤,涉及药物适宜性的多个决定因素。每个指南的有效性证据有限,因为没有一个在随机对照试验中得到评估,试点或可行性研究涉及的患者样本相对较小,尚未确定评分者内和评分者间的信度,并且大多数是在医院环境中进行研究的。在缺乏直接比较的情况下,哪种指南对临床医生最有用尚不清楚。虽然大多数指南具有表面效度,但仍需要更多研究来确定其在常规临床实践中的有效性和易用性,尤其是在初级保健环境中。

相似文献

1
Review of structured guides for deprescribing.减药结构化指南综述。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2017 Jan;24(1):51-57. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2015-000864.
5
Is my older cancer patient on too many medications?我的老年癌症患者服用的药物过多吗?
J Geriatr Oncol. 2017 Mar;8(2):77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
10
Deprescribing in older people.老年人的减药方案
Maturitas. 2016 Sep;91:115-34. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

7
[Deprescribing in DGPPN S3 guidelines-a systematic analysis].[DGPPN S3指南中的减药——一项系统分析]
Nervenarzt. 2025 Jan;96(1):74-80. doi: 10.1007/s00115-024-01671-z. Epub 2024 May 17.

本文引用的文献

6
Recommendations to support deprescribing medications late in life.支持老年人减停药物的建议。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2015 Oct;37(5):678-81. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0148-6.
8
Physicians need to take the lead in deprescribing.医生需要带头减少用药。
Intern Med J. 2015 Mar;45(3):352-6. doi: 10.1111/imj.12693.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验