• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用 Naranjo 算法在日常实践中改进药物不良反应评估:日本药物不良事件研究。

Improving the assessment of adverse drug reactions using the Naranjo Algorithm in daily practice: The Japan Adverse Drug Events Study.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan.

出版信息

Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2018 Feb;6(1). doi: 10.1002/prp2.373.

DOI:10.1002/prp2.373
PMID:29417762
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5817823/
Abstract

It is difficult to determine adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in daily complicated clinical practice in which many kinds of drugs are prescribed. We evaluated how well the Naranjo Algorithm (NA) categorized ADRs among suspected ADRs. The Japan Adverse Drug Events (JADE) study was a prospective cohort study of 3459 inpatients. After all suspected ADRs were reported from research assistants, a single physician reviewer independently assigned an NA score to each. After all NA score of suspected ADRs were scored, two physician reviewers discussed and determined ADRs based on the literature. We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of NA and each component to categorize ADRs among suspected ADRs. A total of 1579 suspected ADRs were reported in 962 patients. Physician reviewers determined 997 ADRs. The percentage of ADRs was 94% if the total NA score reached 5. The modified NA consisted of 5 components that showed high classification abilities; its area under the curve (AUC) was 0.92 for categorizing ADRs, the same as the original. When we set the total NA score cut-off value to 5, specificity was 0.95 and sensitivity was 0.59. When we reclassified NA components as binary variables, the specificity increased to 0.98 with a cut-off value of 4 and yielded an AUC of 0.93. In conclusion, we showed that both NA and modified NA could categorize ADRs among suspected ADRs with a high likelihood in daily clinical practice.

摘要

在日常复杂的临床实践中,由于开具了多种药物,很难确定药物不良反应(ADR)。我们评估了 Naranjo 算法(NA)在疑似 ADR 中分类 ADR 的效果如何。日本药物不良事件(JADE)研究是一项针对 3459 名住院患者的前瞻性队列研究。在研究助理报告所有疑似 ADR 后,由一名医生独立对每个疑似 ADR 进行 NA 评分。在对所有疑似 ADR 的 NA 评分进行评分后,两名医生评审员根据文献讨论并确定 ADR。我们研究了 NA 和每个成分在疑似 ADR 中分类 ADR 的敏感性和特异性。在 962 名患者中报告了 1579 例疑似 ADR。医生评审员确定了 997 例 ADR。如果总 NA 评分达到 5,ADR 的比例为 94%。改良的 NA 由 5 个组成部分组成,具有较高的分类能力;其区分 ADR 的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.92,与原始 NA 相同。当我们将总 NA 评分截断值设置为 5 时,特异性为 0.95,敏感性为 0.59。当我们将 NA 成分重新分类为二进制变量时,特异性提高到 0.98,截断值为 4,AUC 为 0.93。总之,我们表明,无论是 NA 还是改良的 NA,都可以在日常临床实践中高度可能地对疑似 ADR 中的 ADR 进行分类。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6839/5817823/f6270213888b/PRP2-6-e00373-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6839/5817823/1a7aee8a6e76/PRP2-6-e00373-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6839/5817823/d13d15d3a281/PRP2-6-e00373-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6839/5817823/8ab4fb2f3334/PRP2-6-e00373-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6839/5817823/f6270213888b/PRP2-6-e00373-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6839/5817823/1a7aee8a6e76/PRP2-6-e00373-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6839/5817823/d13d15d3a281/PRP2-6-e00373-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6839/5817823/8ab4fb2f3334/PRP2-6-e00373-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6839/5817823/f6270213888b/PRP2-6-e00373-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving the assessment of adverse drug reactions using the Naranjo Algorithm in daily practice: The Japan Adverse Drug Events Study.利用 Naranjo 算法在日常实践中改进药物不良反应评估:日本药物不良事件研究。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2018 Feb;6(1). doi: 10.1002/prp2.373.
2
Evaluation of patient reporting of adverse drug reactions to the UK 'Yellow Card Scheme': literature review, descriptive and qualitative analyses, and questionnaire surveys.评估患者向英国“黄卡计划”报告药物不良反应的情况:文献回顾、描述性和定性分析以及问卷调查。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 May;15(20):1-234, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta15200.
3
Inter-rater agreement between WHO- Uppsala Monitoring Centre system and Naranjo algorithm for causality assessment of adverse drug reactions.WHO- Uppsala 监测中心系统与 Naranjo 算法评估药物不良反应因果关系的一致性研究。
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2024 May-Jun;127:107514. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2024.107514. Epub 2024 May 18.
4
Predicting the Risk of Adverse Drug Reactions in Older Inpatients: External Validation of the GerontoNet ADR Risk Score Using the CRIME Cohort.预测老年住院患者药物不良反应风险:使用CRIME队列对GerontoNet药物不良反应风险评分进行外部验证
Drugs Aging. 2017 Feb;34(2):135-142. doi: 10.1007/s40266-016-0428-4.
5
Preventable and non-preventable adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: a prospective chart review in the Netherlands.住院患者可预防和不可预防的药物不良事件:荷兰的前瞻性图表回顾。
Drug Saf. 2011 Nov 1;34(11):1089-100. doi: 10.2165/11592030-000000000-00000.
6
Frequency, types, severity, preventability and costs of Adverse Drug Reactions at a tertiary care hospital.一家三级护理医院的药品不良反应的发生率、类型、严重程度、可预防性及成本
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2016 Sep-Oct;81:323-34. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
7
Comparison of three pharmacovigilance algorithms in the ICU setting: a retrospective and prospective evaluation of ADRs.三种 ICU 环境下药物警戒算法的比较:ADR 的回顾性和前瞻性评估。
Drug Saf. 2012 Aug 1;35(8):645-53. doi: 10.1007/BF03261961.
8
Relationship between adverse drug reactions and unlicensed/off-label drug use in hospitalized children (EREMI): A study protocol.住院儿童(EREMI)中药物不良反应与未授权/超说明书用药的关系:一项研究方案。
Therapie. 2021 Nov-Dec;76(6):675-685. doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2021.01.057. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
9
Adverse Drug Reactions Related to Drug Administration in Hospitalized Patients.住院患者药物治疗相关的药品不良反应
Curr Drug Saf. 2017;12(3):171-177. doi: 10.2174/1574886312666170616090640.
10
Adverse drug reactions in neonates: a prospective study.新生儿药物不良反应:一项前瞻性研究。
Arch Dis Child. 2016 Apr;101(4):371-6. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309396. Epub 2016 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Serious Adverse Events: A Replicability and Validation Study of Naranjo Causality Assessment Tool in a Canadian Clinical Setting.严重不良事件:加拿大临床环境中Naranjo因果关系评估工具的可重复性与验证研究
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Apr;31(3):e70110. doi: 10.1111/jep.70110.
2
Clinical Presentations and Characteristics of NSAIDs Hypersensitivity in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Indonesia: A Case Series.印度尼西亚一家三级护理医院非甾体抗炎药超敏反应的临床表现及特征:病例系列
Int Med Case Rep J. 2025 Jan 25;18:163-171. doi: 10.2147/IMCRJ.S488796. eCollection 2025.
3
Clinical predictors of 3-month isoniazid rifapentine (3HP)-related adverse drug reactions (ADR) during tuberculosis preventive therapy (PAnDoRA-3HP study): an observational study protocol.

本文引用的文献

1
Methods for estimating causal relationships of adverse events with dietary supplements.评估膳食补充剂不良事件因果关系的方法。
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 25;5(11):e009038. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009038.
2
Validation and Reproducibility of the Updated French Causality Assessment Method: an Evaluation by Pharmacovigilance Centres & Pharmaceutical Companies.更新后的法国因果关系评估方法的验证与可重复性:药物警戒中心与制药公司的评估
Therapie. 2015 Sep-Oct;70(5):465-76. doi: 10.2515/therapie/2015028. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
3
Frequency and Severity of Adverse Drug Events by Medication Classes: The JADE Study.
结核病预防性治疗期间3个月异烟肼利福喷汀(3HP)相关药物不良反应(ADR)的临床预测因素(PAnDoRA - 3HP研究):一项观察性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 31;14(12):e088389. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088389.
4
Morphine-induced fever: a case report and review of the literature.吗啡诱导性发热:病例报告及文献复习。
J Med Case Rep. 2024 Sep 27;18(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s13256-024-04770-2.
5
Medical Cannabis Prescription Practices and Quality of Life in Thai Patients: A Nationwide Prospective Observational Cohort Study.泰国患者的医用大麻处方实践与生活质量:一项全国性前瞻性观察队列研究。
Med Cannabis Cannabinoids. 2024 Jul 17;7(1):125-137. doi: 10.1159/000540153. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
Clinical Predictors of 3-Months Isoniazid Rifapentine (3HP) - Related Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) During Tuberculosis Preventive Therapy. (PAnDoRA-3HP study): An Observational Study Protocol.结核病预防性治疗期间3个月异烟肼利福喷丁(3HP)相关药物不良反应(ADR)的临床预测因素。(PAnDoRA-3HP研究):一项观察性研究方案。
medRxiv. 2024 Jun 2:2024.06.01.24308310. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.01.24308310.
7
New Onset and Exacerbation of Autoimmune Bullous Dermatosis Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review.新冠疫苗接种后自身免疫性大疱性皮肤病的新发与加重:一项系统评价
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Apr 26;12(5):465. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12050465.
8
Polymyxin B-induced Bartter syndrome.黏菌素 B 诱导的巴特综合征。
BMJ Case Rep. 2024 May 3;17(5):e255242. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2023-255242.
9
Safety evaluation of a buffer used in the lyophilization of canine platelets: type I hypersensitivity reaction in dogs caused by bovine serum albumin.犬血小板冻干所用缓冲液的安全性评估:牛血清白蛋白引起犬的I型超敏反应
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Feb 12;11:1344037. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1344037. eCollection 2024.
10
The evaluation of adverse drug reactions in Saudi Arabia: A retrospective observational study.沙特阿拉伯药物不良反应的评估:一项回顾性观察研究。
Saudi Pharm J. 2022 Jun;30(6):735-741. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2022.03.018. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
药物类别所致药物不良事件的频率和严重程度:JADE 研究。
J Patient Saf. 2020 Mar;16(1):30-35. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000235.
4
Causality assessment of adverse drug reaction in Pulmonology Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital.三级护理医院呼吸内科药物不良反应的因果关系评估
J Basic Clin Pharm. 2015 Jun;6(3):84-8. doi: 10.4103/0976-0105.160744.
5
Influence of adverse drug events on morbidity and mortality in intensive care units: the JADE study.不良药物事件对重症监护病房发病率和死亡率的影响:JADE研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Dec;26(6):573-8. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu081. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
6
Adverse drug events and medication errors in Japanese paediatric inpatients: a retrospective cohort study.日本儿科住院患者的药物不良事件和用药错误:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Oct;23(10):830-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002658. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
7
Clinical prediction rule to identify high-risk inpatients for adverse drug events: the JADE Study.临床预测规则识别发生药物不良事件的高危住院患者:JADE 研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 Nov;21(11):1221-6. doi: 10.1002/pds.3331. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
8
Development and inter-rater reliability of the Liverpool adverse drug reaction causality assessment tool.利物浦药物不良反应因果关系评估工具的开发和评分者间信度。
PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028096. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
9
Epidemiology of potentially inappropriate medication use in elderly patients in Japanese acute care hospitals.日本急性护理医院老年患者潜在不适当药物使用的流行病学。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Apr;20(4):386-92. doi: 10.1002/pds.2110. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
10
Therapeutic acetaminophen is not associated with liver injury in children: a systematic review.治疗剂量的对乙酰氨基酚与儿童肝损伤无关:系统评价。
Pediatrics. 2010 Dec;126(6):e1430-44. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-3352. Epub 2010 Nov 22.