Clinical Nutrition Research Centre, Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, 30 Medical Drive, Singapore 117609, Singapore.
Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2013 Mar;64(2):223-9. doi: 10.3109/09637486.2012.713917. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
Bread has become a widely consumed staple food in South-east Asia. However, there is very little data on the glycaemic potential of local commercial breads. The objective of this study was to comparatively assess the glycaemic potential of some commonly consumed commercial breads using a validated in vitro model. Sixteen types of breads representing the most popular brands and types were evaluated. The results showed that white and enriched white breads had a greater glycaemic potential than wholemeal breads (rapidly digestible starch (RDS) content >450 mg of glucose/g of sample). The lowest glycaemic potential was observed for wholegrain breads (RDS content < 375 mg of glucose/g of sample). The glycaemic impact of some specialty breads such as pandan bread, milk bread and corn loaf was also examined. Whist the data show that South-east Asian breads have notably differential effects on glycaemia, it highlights the need to formulate Asian dietary guidelines for bread which will enable better food choice and glycaemic control.
面包已成为东南亚广泛食用的主食。然而,关于当地商业面包的血糖生成潜力的数据却很少。本研究的目的是使用经过验证的体外模型比较评估一些常见商业面包的血糖生成潜力。评估了代表最受欢迎品牌和类型的 16 种面包。结果表明,白面包和强化白面包的血糖生成潜力大于全麦面包(快速消化淀粉(RDS)含量> 450mg 葡萄糖/g 样品)。全谷物面包的血糖生成潜力最低(RDS 含量<375mg 葡萄糖/g 样品)。一些特色面包,如班兰面包、牛奶面包和玉米面包的血糖影响也进行了研究。虽然数据显示东南亚面包对血糖有明显的不同影响,但这突出表明需要制定亚洲面包饮食指南,以实现更好的食物选择和血糖控制。