Singh Amika S, Chinapaw Mai J M, Uijtdewilligen Léonie, Vik Froydis N, van Lippevelde Wendy, Fernández-Alvira Juan M, Stomfai Sarolta, Manios Yannis, van der Sluijs Maria, Terwee Caroline, Brug Johannes
EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Public and Occupational Health, VU University medical center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
BMC Res Notes. 2012 Aug 13;5:434. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-434.
Insight in parental energy balance-related behaviours, their determinants and parenting practices are important to inform childhood obesity prevention. Therefore, reliable and valid tools to measure these variables in large-scale population research are needed. The objective of the current study was to examine the test-retest reliability and construct validity of the parent questionnaire used in the ENERGY-project, assessing parental energy balance-related behaviours, their determinants, and parenting practices among parents of 10-12 year old children.
We collected data among parents (n = 316 in the test-retest reliability study; n = 109 in the construct validity study) of 10-12 year-old children in six European countries, i.e. Belgium, Greece, Hungary, the Netherlands, Norway, and Spain. Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and percentage agreement comparing scores from two measurements, administered one week apart. To assess construct validity, the agreement between questionnaire responses and a subsequent interview was assessed using ICC and percentage agreement.All but one item showed good to excellent test-retest reliability as indicated by ICCs > .60 or percentage agreement ≥ 75%. Construct validity appeared to be good to excellent for 92 out of 121 items, as indicated by ICCs > .60 or percentage agreement ≥ 75%. From the other 29 items, construct validity was moderate for 24 and poor for 5 items.
The reliability and construct validity of the items of the ENERGY-parent questionnaire on multiple energy balance-related behaviours, their potential determinants, and parenting practices appears to be good. Based on the results of the validity study, we strongly recommend adapting parts of the ENERGY-parent questionnaire if used in future research.
了解父母与能量平衡相关的行为、其决定因素及育儿方式对于预防儿童肥胖至关重要。因此,需要可靠且有效的工具在大规模人群研究中测量这些变量。本研究的目的是检验ENERGY项目中使用的家长问卷的重测信度和结构效度,该问卷用于评估10至12岁儿童家长的能量平衡相关行为、其决定因素及育儿方式。
我们在六个欧洲国家(即比利时、希腊、匈牙利、荷兰、挪威和西班牙)收集了10至12岁儿童家长的数据(重测信度研究中n = 316;结构效度研究中n = 109)。使用组内相关系数(ICC)和比较相隔一周进行的两次测量得分的百分比一致性来评估重测信度。为评估结构效度,使用ICC和百分比一致性评估问卷回答与后续访谈之间的一致性。除一项外,所有项目均显示出良好至优秀的重测信度,ICC > .60或百分比一致性≥ 75%表明了这一点。121个项目中有92个项目的结构效度似乎良好至优秀,ICC > .60或百分比一致性≥ 75%表明了这一点。在其他29个项目中,24个项目的结构效度中等,5个项目的结构效度较差。
ENERGY家长问卷中关于多种能量平衡相关行为、其潜在决定因素及育儿方式的项目的信度和结构效度似乎良好。基于效度研究的结果,我们强烈建议如果在未来研究中使用ENERGY家长问卷,应对其部分内容进行调整。